Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0701:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
May 0808:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
May 0808:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
04 May 2026, 07:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
81% (00:56) correct
19%
(01:27)
wrong
based on 32
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Letter to the editor: I was shocked to learn that Judge Mosston was convicted of criminal assault, but I disagree with my fellow citizens who believe that he should be forced to resign. I have played cards with Judge Mosston for many years, and he has always shown himself to be fair toward me and our fellow cardplayers. Our judicial system simply cannot afford to lose any just and fair judges.
The reasoning in the letter is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
(A) confuses duties specific to legal professionals with the responsibilities of private citizens
(B) insists upon a distinction between "fair" and "just" which cannot plausibly be maintained
(C) makes a general claim about an individual's professional competence based on an unrepresentative sampling of the individual's behavior
(D) treats the violent crime of criminal assault as if its consequences were no more serious than winning or losing at cards
(E) asserts a conclusion based on popular opinion rather than on argumentation
The reasoning in the letter is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
(A) confuses duties specific to legal professionals with the responsibilities of private citizens
(B) insists upon a distinction between "fair" and "just" which cannot plausibly be maintained
(C) makes a general claim about an individual's professional competence based on an unrepresentative sampling of the individual's behavior
(D) treats the violent crime of criminal assault as if its consequences were no more serious than winning or losing at cards
(E) asserts a conclusion based on popular opinion rather than on argumentation
04 May 2026, 07:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
context: the author argues Judge Mosston should not resign because in personal card games he has been “fair,” and concludes he is a just and fair judge professionally.
prethinking: gap between informal personal behavior (cards) and professional judicial conduct. small, biased sample used to judge broader competence.
elimination:
A: not about confusing duties vs citizens; it’s about evidence quality → no
B: no real distinction issue between fair and just → no
C: yes — uses limited personal experience (card games) to generalize about professional ability as a judge → matches flaw
D: not minimizing assault’s seriousness; it’s ignoring it, not comparing to cards → no
E: not based on popular opinion → no
answer: C
prethinking: gap between informal personal behavior (cards) and professional judicial conduct. small, biased sample used to judge broader competence.
elimination:
A: not about confusing duties vs citizens; it’s about evidence quality → no
B: no real distinction issue between fair and just → no
C: yes — uses limited personal experience (card games) to generalize about professional ability as a judge → matches flaw
D: not minimizing assault’s seriousness; it’s ignoring it, not comparing to cards → no
E: not based on popular opinion → no
answer: C
04 May 2026, 11:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
Letter to the editor: I was shocked to learn that Judge Mosston was convicted of criminal assault, but I disagree with my fellow citizens who believe that he should be forced to resign. I have played cards with Judge Mosston for many years, and he has always shown himself to be fair toward me and our fellow cardplayers. Our judicial system simply cannot afford to lose any just and fair judges.
The reasoning in the letter is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
The writer concludes that Judge Mosston should not be forced to resign because he has behaved fairly while playing cards. The flaw is that fairness in a private card game is weak evidence for fairness or competence as a judge.
(A) confuses duties specific to legal professionals with the responsibilities of private citizens
Wrong. The argument does not confuse legal duties with private-citizen duties. It uses private behavior as evidence about professional suitability.
(B) insists upon a distinction between "fair" and "just" which cannot plausibly be maintained
Wrong. The argument does not depend on a distinction between “fair” and “just.”
(C) makes a general claim about an individual's professional competence based on an unrepresentative sampling of the individual's behavior
Correct. The writer judges Mosston’s fitness as a judge based on personal experience playing cards with him, which is not representative evidence of his judicial fairness or professional competence.
(D) treats the violent crime of criminal assault as if its consequences were no more serious than winning or losing at cards
Wrong. The writer may underweight the assault conviction, but the specific reasoning flaw is not that the crime is treated as equivalent to a card-game result.
(E) asserts a conclusion based on popular opinion rather than on argumentation
Wrong. The writer actually rejects popular opinion and gives an argument, though the argument is weak.
Answer: (C)
The reasoning in the letter is most vulnerable to the criticism that it
The writer concludes that Judge Mosston should not be forced to resign because he has behaved fairly while playing cards. The flaw is that fairness in a private card game is weak evidence for fairness or competence as a judge.
(A) confuses duties specific to legal professionals with the responsibilities of private citizens
Wrong. The argument does not confuse legal duties with private-citizen duties. It uses private behavior as evidence about professional suitability.
(B) insists upon a distinction between "fair" and "just" which cannot plausibly be maintained
Wrong. The argument does not depend on a distinction between “fair” and “just.”
(C) makes a general claim about an individual's professional competence based on an unrepresentative sampling of the individual's behavior
Correct. The writer judges Mosston’s fitness as a judge based on personal experience playing cards with him, which is not representative evidence of his judicial fairness or professional competence.
(D) treats the violent crime of criminal assault as if its consequences were no more serious than winning or losing at cards
Wrong. The writer may underweight the assault conviction, but the specific reasoning flaw is not that the crime is treated as equivalent to a card-game result.
(E) asserts a conclusion based on popular opinion rather than on argumentation
Wrong. The writer actually rejects popular opinion and gives an argument, though the argument is weak.
Answer: (C)
