Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0701:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
May 0808:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
May 0808:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
06 May 2026, 11:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
70% (01:49) correct
30%
(01:45)
wrong
based on 10
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
All art criticism is political because all art has political implications. Clearly, the critic who chooses to address overtly an artwork's political implications is engaged in political discourse. But those critics who attempt a purely aesthetic evaluation of a work, and therefore ignore the work's political implications, necessarily, though perhaps inadvertently, end up endorsing the politics of the artist.
If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
(E) Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true?
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
(E) Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
06 May 2026, 15:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
All art criticism is political because all art has political implications. Clearly, the critic who chooses to address overtly an artwork's political implications is engaged in political discourse. But those critics who attempt a purely aesthetic evaluation of a work, and therefore ignore the work's political implications, necessarily, though perhaps inadvertently, end up endorsing the politics of the artist.
If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true?
This is an Inference question, and the correct answer will be the one that "must be true" given what the statements in the passage say.
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
The passage does not indicate anything about how often critics "endorse art for art's own sake."
So, there's nothing in the passage that supports this choice.
Eliminate.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
The passage says that critics who attempt apolitical critiques may "inadvertently" endorse the politics of the artist, which could be taken as indicating that, in attempting apolitical critiques, critics may be acting naively.
At the same time, the passage does not indicate that critics who are politically naive attempt only apolitical critiques. Given what the passage says, politically naive critics could attempt both politically and apolitical critiques.
Thus, this choice does not have be true.
Eliminate.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
The passage does not say anything indicating what sort of art critics are typically concerned with. Rather, it discusses only how critics choose to evaluate art.
Eliminate.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
The passage says nothing about the "value" of different types of critiques.
Eliminate.
(E) Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
This choice is perfectly supported by the last sentence of the passage.
After all, if it's true that "critics who attempt a purely aesthetic evaluation of a work ... necessarily ... end up endorsing the politics of the artist," then it must be true that the criticism of such critics "never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review."
After all, if such critics are "endorsing" the politics of the artist, then they must not be rejecting the politics of the artist.
So, if the statements in the passage are true, this choice must be true.
Keep.
Correct answer: E
If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true?
This is an Inference question, and the correct answer will be the one that "must be true" given what the statements in the passage say.
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
The passage does not indicate anything about how often critics "endorse art for art's own sake."
So, there's nothing in the passage that supports this choice.
Eliminate.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
The passage says that critics who attempt apolitical critiques may "inadvertently" endorse the politics of the artist, which could be taken as indicating that, in attempting apolitical critiques, critics may be acting naively.
At the same time, the passage does not indicate that critics who are politically naive attempt only apolitical critiques. Given what the passage says, politically naive critics could attempt both politically and apolitical critiques.
Thus, this choice does not have be true.
Eliminate.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
The passage does not say anything indicating what sort of art critics are typically concerned with. Rather, it discusses only how critics choose to evaluate art.
Eliminate.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
The passage says nothing about the "value" of different types of critiques.
Eliminate.
(E) Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
This choice is perfectly supported by the last sentence of the passage.
After all, if it's true that "critics who attempt a purely aesthetic evaluation of a work ... necessarily ... end up endorsing the politics of the artist," then it must be true that the criticism of such critics "never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review."
After all, if such critics are "endorsing" the politics of the artist, then they must not be rejecting the politics of the artist.
So, if the statements in the passage are true, this choice must be true.
Keep.
Correct answer: E
WiziusCareers1
Joined: 27 Apr 2009
Last visit: 06 May 2026
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Status:Not Applying
Location: India
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
06 May 2026, 17:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
Deconstructing the Logical Chain
Let's break the argument into its core components:
Premise 1: All art has political implications.
Premise 2: Therefore, all art criticism is political.
Premise 3: If a critic addresses politics overtly, then they are engaged in political discourse.
Premise 4: If a critic attempts a purely aesthetic evaluation (ignoring politics), then they necessarily end up endorsing the politics of the artist.
Why (E) is the Correct Answer
Statement (E): Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
The Logic: Premise 4 explicitly states that if you try to be "purely aesthetic" and ignore the politics, you necessarily (which means "must" or "always") end up endorsing the politics.
The Inference: If you are always endorsing the politics in this scenario, it is logically impossible for you to be rejecting them. "Endorsing" and "Rejecting" are mutually exclusive in this context. Therefore, if you must endorse, you never reject.
This is a direct restatement of the final sentence of the passage.
In these questions, incorrect answers usually fail because they are too "strong" (using words like always or rarely without evidence) or they introduce topics not mentioned in the text.
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage tells us what these critics are doing (engaged in political discourse), but it doesn't tell us what they don't do. We have no information about how often they endorse "art for art's sake." They might do it frequently alongside their political discourse.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage never mentions "politically naive" critics. We cannot infer the personality or knowledge level of the critics from their choice of methodology. This introduces a new concept not found in the premises.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage discusses how critics approach art, but it doesn't say which type of art they prefer or are "typically concerned" with. It applies its logic to all art, not just overtly political art.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
Reason to Eliminate: This is a value judgment. The passage is a descriptive argument (how things are), not a normative one (how things should be). It never ranks the "value" of one critique over another; it only defines their nature.
Let's break the argument into its core components:
Premise 1: All art has political implications.
Premise 2: Therefore, all art criticism is political.
Premise 3: If a critic addresses politics overtly, then they are engaged in political discourse.
Premise 4: If a critic attempts a purely aesthetic evaluation (ignoring politics), then they necessarily end up endorsing the politics of the artist.
Why (E) is the Correct Answer
Statement (E): Art criticism that is intended to evaluate a work on purely aesthetic grounds never ends up rejecting the politics of the artist whose work is under review.
The Logic: Premise 4 explicitly states that if you try to be "purely aesthetic" and ignore the politics, you necessarily (which means "must" or "always") end up endorsing the politics.
The Inference: If you are always endorsing the politics in this scenario, it is logically impossible for you to be rejecting them. "Endorsing" and "Rejecting" are mutually exclusive in this context. Therefore, if you must endorse, you never reject.
This is a direct restatement of the final sentence of the passage.
In these questions, incorrect answers usually fail because they are too "strong" (using words like always or rarely without evidence) or they introduce topics not mentioned in the text.
(A) Critics who overtly address an artwork's political implications rarely endorse art for art's own sake.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage tells us what these critics are doing (engaged in political discourse), but it doesn't tell us what they don't do. We have no information about how often they endorse "art for art's sake." They might do it frequently alongside their political discourse.
(B) Critics who are politically naive always attempt purely apolitical critiques of art.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage never mentions "politically naive" critics. We cannot infer the personality or knowledge level of the critics from their choice of methodology. This introduces a new concept not found in the premises.
(C) Art that makes an overt social or political statement is the sort of art with which critics are typically concerned.
Reason to Eliminate: The passage discusses how critics approach art, but it doesn't say which type of art they prefer or are "typically concerned" with. It applies its logic to all art, not just overtly political art.
(D) A political critique of a work of art has more value than any other sort of critique of that work.
Reason to Eliminate: This is a value judgment. The passage is a descriptive argument (how things are), not a normative one (how things should be). It never ranks the "value" of one critique over another; it only defines their nature.
