Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 04:05 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 04:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
trx123
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
17
 [17]
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
 [17]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
anshumishra
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Last visit: 21 Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
164
 [9]
Posts: 57
Kudos: 164
 [9]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chaoswithin
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
21
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.29
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 23
Kudos: 21
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anshumishra
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Last visit: 21 Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Posts: 57
Kudos: 164
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You are right. I made a mistake !

chaoswithin
anshumishra
Rate of decrease in population, in city A = (10000-9040)/8 = 120 persons/year
Rate of increase in population, in city B = (4560-4000)/8 = 140 persons/year

Lets assume after t years, starting in 1990, the population becomes equals;
=> 10000 - 120*t = 4000 + 140*t
=> 260t = 6000
=> t ~= 23 years

So, the populations for city A and B would be equal in year, 1990+23 = 2013.

Shouldn't you start at year 1998 because in city B had 4000 population in year 1994.

So I would use the equation

9040 - 120t = 4560 + 140t and solve for 17 < t < 18.

So year 2015 would be my answer.
User avatar
trx123
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think 2015 is the right answer. But what's wrong with this?
An exponential function can be used to model population growth that has a constant percentage change in population:
\(f(t)=ab^t\)
Where
f(t)= population after t years
a=initial value
b=growth factor
t=time in years
For town A:
\(9040=10000b^8\)
\(b=(9040/10000)^{1/8}=.987\)
For town B:
\(4560=4000b^4\)
\(b=(4560/4000)^{1/4}=1.033\)
Equating the two functions with an initial value corresponding to the year 1998 we get:
\(9040(0.987)^t=4560(1.033)^t\)
\(t=log1.98/(log1.033-log0.987)=14.99\)
Therefore, 15 years after 1998, or in 2013, the populations of towns A and B will be the same.
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
3,231
 [2]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,231
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
trx123
The population in town A declined at a constant rate from 10,000 in the year 1990 to 9,040 in the year 1998. The population in town B increased at a constant rate from 4,000 in the year 1994 to 4,560 in the year 1998. If the rates of change of population in towns A and B remain the same, in approximately what year will the populations in the two towns be equal?

Town A : In 8 years declined from 10,000 to 9,040 ... So annualized decline of 1.2%
Town B : In 4 years increased from 4,000 to 4,560 ... So annualized increase of 3.5%

Let it take x years to equate the two populations
Current difference is 4480
Town A decreases at approx 90 people a year (since the pop changes from 9040 to lower .. we can calc this as approx 1.2% of around 8000)
Town B increases at approx 210 people a year (since the pop changes from 4560 to higher .. we can calc this as approx 3.5% of around 6500)
SO approx number of years = 4480/(300) = Approx 15

So answer should be 1998+15 = 2013

If you calculate this prcisely, you can verify it is 2013 as well
User avatar
chaoswithin
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.29
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Now I want to know what the actual answer is.

trx123
I think 2015 is the right answer. But what's wrong with this?
An exponential function can be used to model population growth that has a constant percentage change in population:
\(f(t)=ab^t\)
Where
f(t)= population after t years
a=initial value
b=growth factor
t=time in years
For town A:
\(9040=10000b^8\)
\(b=(9040/10000)^{1/8}=.987\)
For town B:
\(4560=4000b^4\)
\(b=(4560/4000)^{1/4}=1.033\)
Equating the two functions with an initial value corresponding to the year 1998 we get:
\(9040(0.987)^t=4560(1.033)^t\)
\(t=log1.98/(log1.033-log0.987)=14.99\)
Therefore, 15 years after 1998, or in 2013, the populations of towns A and B will be the same.

Your approach is different from mine in that I used constant numerical rate approach whereas you used a constant percent rate approach.

The two approach has to lead to different answers.

Your approach would show that Town A's population is decreasing at 1.3% per year.

Whereas my approach would show that Town A's population is decreasing at 120pp/year.

The thing to note about percent rate of change is that the number of population change would either accelerate or decelerate as time goes on.

Therefore, since Town A's population is decreasing, the number of population decreasing would gradually become smaller, whereas the number of population increase in Town B's population would gradually accelerate.

Because of this reason, the crossing point for the two towns would come earlier in the constant percent rate analysis than the crossing point for the two towns in the constant numerical rate analysis.

If I was given this on the GMAT I would just use the numerical rate approach and move on. If I tried to go the percent route, I might stress myself too much and jeopardize the rest of the QUANT section :( Anyone else have a take on this?
User avatar
trx123
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chaoswithin
anshumishra
Rate of decrease in population, in city A = (10000-9040)/8 = 120 persons/year
Rate of increase in population, in city B = (4560-4000)/8 = 140 persons/year

Lets assume after t years, starting in 1990, the population becomes equals;
=> 10000 - 120*t = 4000 + 140*t
=> 260t = 6000
=> t ~= 23 years

So, the populations for city A and B would be equal in year, 1990+23 = 2013.

Shouldn't you start at year 1998 because in city B had 4000 population in year 1994.

So I would use the equation

9040 - 120t = 4560 + 140t and solve for 17 < t < 18.

So year 2015 would be my answer.

I believe 2015 is the correct answer. The problem states that the population growth is constant. I used exponential growth, which as you sated is not constant but accelerates or decelerates with time.
The constant rate formula is
\(f(t)=9040-120t\)
The exponential rate formula is:
\(f(t)=9040(.987)^t\)
Thank you for answering
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,231
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The thing is that "rate" generally means percentage (think rate of interest got instance)
So I think correct answer is 2013

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
User avatar
trx123
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The problem states that the population (the number of people) and not the percent of the population, increased or decreased at a constant rate. The word rate is defined as a value describing one quantity in terms of another. In this case one quantity is time, the other is number of people. Initially, I also assumed that the rate was the yearly percent change in population. The answer really depends how you interpret the question.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,442
Own Kudos:
79,400
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,442
Kudos: 79,400
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The rate at which population increases is the percentage at which it increases. If I say, 'The population increases at a constant rate', I mean it increases in every time period by a fixed percentage e.g. 10%. In fact population increase is a typical example of compounding. But that really made the calculations here torturous, which is definitely not a characteristic of GMAT questions.
If they want to say that they are referring to a constant increase/decrease in number of people, they need to say 'the population increases/decreases by a constant number of people every year' or something.
User avatar
trx123
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
The rate at which population increases is the percentage at which it increases. If I say, 'The population increases at a constant rate', I mean it increases in every time period by a fixed percentage e.g. 10%. In fact population increase is a typical example of compounding. But that really made the calculations here torturous, which is definitely not a characteristic of GMAT questions.
If they want to say that they are referring to a constant increase/decrease in number of people, they need to say 'the population increases/decreases by a constant number of people every year' or something.

I agree with you and initially that was exactly my approach. But this problem was taken from a multiple choice Arizona teacher proficiency test. The answer key gave the correct answer as 2015. So I presume that they meant constant number of people. Anyway, thanks for your help.
User avatar
Sarang
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Last visit: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 79
Kudos: 280
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The rate at which population increases is the percentage at which it increases. If I say, 'The population increases at a constant rate', I mean it increases in every time period by a fixed percentage e.g. 10%. In fact population increase is a typical example of compounding. But that really made the calculations here torturous, which is definitely not a characteristic of GMAT questions.
If they want to say that they are referring to a constant increase/decrease in number of people, they need to say 'the population increases/decreases by a constant number of people every year' or something.



Nice explaination Karishma..
User avatar
dimitri92
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Last visit: 18 May 2019
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
3,651
 [3]
Given Kudos: 34
Affiliations: SPG
Posts: 229
Kudos: 3,651
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Population difference = 6000

Annual decrease in A's population \(= \frac{960}{8} = 120\)

Annual increase in B's population \(= \frac{560}{4} = 140\)

Total change \(= 120+140= 260\)

Required time \(= \frac{6000}{260}= 23\) (approx)

1990+23= year 2013




avatar
mehtakaustubh
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Last visit: 21 Jun 2022
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
WE:Design (Computer Software)
Posts: 63
Kudos: 155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
10000-120t=4000+140t
solving we get t=23(aprox)
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,302
Kudos: 2,976
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dimitri92

Population difference = 6000

Annual decrease in A's population \(= \frac{960}{8} = 120\)

Annual increase in B's population \(= \frac{560}{4} = 140\)

Total change \(= 120+140= 260\)

Required time \(= \frac{6000}{260}= 23\) (approx)

1990+23= year 2013






Just gave you your Kudos #200 for this one, Good job
Cheers
J :)
avatar
Parvezahmed2210
Joined: 13 Aug 2019
Last visit: 11 Mar 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Posts: 17
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the number would be 18>t>17.

The difference is not 6000 because the initial population of A (10000) and B (4000) in two different timelines. The gap should be considered from 1998 onwards.

If we follow the relativity formula.

A' rate is : 120 and B's rate is 140.

Here total rate is 120+140 = 260

Now the remaining gap of the population: 9040-4560 = 4480.

Number of years required: 4480/260= 17.23.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,967
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,967
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109809 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts