Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 08:42 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 08:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Maxirosario2012
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
182
 [9]
Given Kudos: 155
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Narenn
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 9,293
Own Kudos:
11,304
 [4]
Given Kudos: 4,711
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Test: Test
Posts: 9,293
Kudos: 11,304
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Maxirosario2012
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
182
 [1]
Given Kudos: 155
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,241
Own Kudos:
1,722
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,241
Kudos: 1,722
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
X = 2Y and Z = Y+2 are given to us to be true according to the question.

1) (X+3) = 2(Y+3) => X + 3 = 2Y + 6 => X = 2Y +3, which cannot be true as X=2Y. NEVER TRUE--> REJECT.
2) (Y+3) + 2 = Z+3 => Y+2 = Z, which is true. ALWAYS TRUE --> ACCEPT.
3) X+3 > Z+3 => X>Z => 2Y > (Y+2) => Y>2. So this is true only if Y>2, else it is false. We can check this out quickly. If X=2, Y=1, Z=4, then X<Z, but if X=6,Y=3,Z=5, then X>Z. CONDITIONALLY TRUE --> REJECT.

Therefore the answer must be (B).
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,442
Own Kudos:
79,403
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,442
Kudos: 79,403
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Maxirosario2012
Thank you Narenn.
I posted this problem because Kaplan suggest to use the "picking numbers" strategy.
But I think that backsolving is not the best approach.
Why?:

If X= 6
Y= 3
Z= 5

Then, after adding 3 feet to each:

X= 9
Y=6
Z=8

And the answer would be E, which is wrong.

You are correct. Number plugging in almost never a good approach when you have to prove that something MUST BE TRUE. To prove that something will be true in every case, how many cases are sufficient? Can I check 2 cases and say that it will be true in every case? Should I check 6, or 20? Even if something is true in 20 cases, it may not hold for the 21st case! We must use logic to prove that something must be true in every case.
But we can use number plugging to disprove something. i.e. we try to find the case in which it doesn't hold and then we can say that something needn't be true in every case.

Just taking the example of X = 6 (you took one case), you cannot say that II and III must be true. All you can say is that I certainly is not true in every case.

Using logic:
"X is twice as long as fence Y"
"fence Y is 2 feet shorter than fence Z"
"3 feet were added to each fence"

I) X is twice as long as Y.
X is originally twice as long as Y. When we add 3 to both, X will no longer be twice. Not true.

II) Y is 2 feet shorter than Z.
Originally, Y was 2 feet shorter than Z. If you add equal length to both (i.e. 3 feet) , Y will still remain 2 feet shorter than Z. Always true.

III) X is longer than Z.
X is twice of Y (hence X greater than Y) and Z is 2 more than Y (Z is greater than Y too). Both X and Z are greater than Y so we don't know what is the relation between X and Z.
Say if Y = 1, Z = 3 and X = 2. So X needn't be longer than Z.
User avatar
Temurkhon
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Last visit: 06 Apr 2019
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Schools: Cambridge'16
Posts: 408
Kudos: 325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Narenn
Maxirosario2012
Fence X is twice as long as fence Y, and fence Y is 2 feet shorter than fence Z. If 3 feet were added to each fence, which of the following must be true?

I) X is twice as long as Y.
II) Y is 2 feet shorter than Z.
III) X is longer than Z.

A) I only
B) II only
C) III only
D) I and II
E) II and III

Length of Z = z
Length of Y = z-2
Length of X = 2z-4


Minimum possible length of fence Z is 2 feet, because if we take the value for length of z below 2, lengths of Z and Y would be negative which is not possible.

If Z = 2
then Y = 0 and X = 0

When we add 3 feet in each fence, we will get
Z= 5
Y=3
X=3

Only Statement II holds true with above values.

if Z=2, Y=0 and X=0 then X/Y not equal 2, so minimal cases is Z=3, Y=1 and X=2. The critical is that if X<Z or X=Z these facts make III wrong
User avatar
glagad
Joined: 03 Jun 2022
Last visit: 30 Mar 2026
Posts: 329
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V77 DI79
GPA: 8.98
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V77 DI79
Posts: 329
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Maxirosario2012
Thank you Narenn.
I posted this problem because Kaplan suggest to use the "picking numbers" strategy.
But I think that backsolving is not the best approach.
Why?:

If X= 6
Y= 3
Z= 5

Then, after adding 3 feet to each:

X= 9
Y=6
Z=8

And the answer would be E, which is wrong.

You are correct. Number plugging in almost never a good approach when you have to prove that something MUST BE TRUE. To prove that something will be true in every case, how many cases are sufficient? Can I check 2 cases and say that it will be true in every case? Should I check 6, or 20? Even if something is true in 20 cases, it may not hold for the 21st case! We must use logic to prove that something must be true in every case.
But we can use number plugging to disprove something. i.e. we try to find the case in which it doesn't hold and then we can say that something needn't be true in every case.

Just taking the example of X = 6 (you took one case), you cannot say that II and III must be true. All you can say is that I certainly is not true in every case.

Using logic:
"X is twice as long as fence Y"
"fence Y is 2 feet shorter than fence Z"
"3 feet were added to each fence"

I) X is twice as long as Y.
X is originally twice as long as Y. When we add 3 to both, X will no longer be twice. Not true.

II) Y is 2 feet shorter than Z.
Originally, Y was 2 feet shorter than Z. If you add equal length to both (i.e. 3 feet) , Y will still remain 2 feet shorter than Z. Always true.

III) X is longer than Z.
X is twice of Y (hence X greater than Y) and Z is 2 more than Y (Z is greater than Y too). Both X and Z are greater than Y so we don't know what is the relation between X and Z.
Say if Y = 1, Z = 3 and X = 2. So X needn't be longer than Z.
Nowhere in the question have they mentioned Z's length. How are we even inferring "Z is 2 more than Y (Z is greater than Y too)". They only talk about Z's height, right?
Please let me know if I am missing something.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109814 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts