This is a great question that tests your understanding of prime number properties and logical reasoning. Let me walk you through how to approach this systematically.
Here's the key insight that unlocks this problem:Notice that all prime numbers greater than 2 must be odd. Why? Because if a number greater than 2 is even, it would be divisible by 2, which means it can't be prime. So both \(x\) and \(y\) are odd numbers – this is the foundation for analyzing all three statements.
Let's evaluate each statement:Statement I: \(x + y \neq 91\)When you add two odd numbers together, what do you get? Let's think about this:
- \(3 + 5 = 8\) (even)
- \(7 + 11 = 18\) (even)
- \(5 + 13 = 18\) (even)
In general, odd + odd = even. This is because any odd number can be written as \(2k + 1\), so \((2j + 1) + (2k + 1) = 2(j + k + 1)\), which is even.
Now, is 91 even or odd? Well, \(91 = 90 + 1\), so 91 is odd.
Since \(x + y\) must always be even (sum of two odd numbers), and 91 is odd, we can never have \(x + y = 91\). Therefore, Statement I must be true.
Statement II: \(x - y\) is an even integerWhen you subtract one odd number from another, what happens?
- \(11 - 5 = 6\) (even)
- \(13 - 7 = 6\) (even)
In general, odd - odd = even, because \((2j + 1) - (2k + 1) = 2(j - k)\), which is even.
So Statement II must always be true.
Statement III: \(x/y\) is not an integerFor \(x/y\) to be an integer, \(x\) would need to be divisible by \(y\). But here's the thing – since both \(x\) and \(y\) are different prime numbers, neither can be divisible by the other.
Why? If \(x\) were divisible by \(y\), then \(y\) would be a factor of \(x\). But \(x\) is prime, so its only factors are 1 and \(x\) itself. Since \(y > 2\) and \(y \neq x\), \(y\) cannot be a factor of \(x\).
Therefore, \(x/y\) can never be an integer, so Statement III must be true.
Conclusion:All three statements (I, II, and III) must be true for any two different prime numbers greater than 2.
Answer: (E) I, II, and IIIWant to master the complete framework?While this explanation covers the core logic, the complete solution on Neuron shows you the systematic approach to tackle all "must be true" problems, common traps students fall into (like confusing "must be true" vs "could be true"), and how to verify your reasoning efficiently. You can check out the
detailed solution on Neuron by e-GMAT to understand the broader patterns and process skills that apply to similar questions. You can also explore comprehensive solutions for
other GMAT official questions on Neuron with practice quizzes and detailed analytics to strengthen your foundation.
Hope this helps! 🎯