bluejeanbaby
This is wrong. The question asks, to what power is 2 raised in the prime factorization of 768?
I agree that's probably what the question writer meant to say, but that is not what the question actually says - it says "What is the greatest value of x such that 2^x is a factor of 768?" The greatest factor of 768 is 768. Can 2^x be equal to 768? Yes, when x is approximately 9.585, so that is the answer to the question if x does not need to be an integer, and there's nothing about the wording of the question that requires x to be an integer.
bluejeanbaby
An underlying assumption of factorization is that only integers can be called "factors" or "divisible" -- divisible actually means evenly divisible, as stated in any college-level algebra textbook. In fact, prime factorization of a positive integer x means the unique list of prime numbers (integers by definition) raised to positive integer powers whose product represents x.
This is all true, at least when you are discussing divisibility over the ring of integers. But 2^x can be a factor of 768 when x is not an integer; all that needs to be true is that 2^x itself is an integer (and a divisor of 768). I do have a Masters degree in Number Theory, so I know something about the subject.