This approach is more or less completely wrong!
So basically 60% already get good results. Answer anything below 60 is already entirely ruled out.
Secondly we need to find ppl who do not take supplements and still get good results.
This will be added to 60 to get final answer
Now we know 70% take supplements therefore 30% dont take supplements.
80% of this 30 dont seem to get good results which is 24%
Remaining 6% is No protein and Good results which is what we need!!
Therefore 60 + 6 = 66%
Overall summary:
60% ==> Take pro and good res
40% ==> Not take pro or No good results
From this 40%
6% No pro BUT good results
24% No protein AND No good res
10% Take Pro BUT No good res
So to confirm our answer we use:
No of good results = 100% - (No.of No good results)
==> 100%-(10+24)% = 66%
Hence our answer is correct.
The MISTAKE:
70% take protein supplements OF THE TOTAL. There is no mention of 60% of THESE 70% of ppl getting good results. Such problems need to be tackled separately using complementaries and handling individual cases separately with careful reading.
Hope it helps!
Edskore
Great solution by Dereno with the matrix approach! Let me add a slightly faster way to think about this using direct weighted calculation — useful when you're short on time.
The quick approach:
The question gives us two groups and their "good results" rates. We just need to find the weighted total.
70% take supplements → 60% of these get good results → 0.70 × 0.60 = 0.42 (42% of all members)
30% don't take supplements → 80% of these get NOT good results, so 20% DO get good results → 0.30 × 0.20 = 0.06 (6% of all members)
Total getting good results = 42% + 6% = 48%
Answer: A
The common mistake here is misreading the conditional percentages. The problem says "60% of those who take supplements report good results" and "80% of those who DON'T take supplements report NOT getting good results." Students often confuse which percentage applies to which subgroup, or accidentally apply 80% as the good-results rate instead of the bad-results rate.
Takeaway: For overlapping-group problems with conditional percentages, the "multiply-and-add" shortcut (group size × rate for each group, then sum) is often faster than building a full matrix — especially under GMAT time pressure.