Key concept: "Must be True" reasoning with a weighted formula — you're not solving for one answer, you're stress-testing each statement against every valid score combination.
The common trap: Most students find one set of (x, y, z) that gives 8.4 and check the statements against just that. But "must be true" means the statement has to hold for every valid combination. One counterexample kills a statement.
Step 1 — Simplify the formula.
Course score = 0.2x + 0.4(y + z) = 8.4
Multiply through by 5: x + 2(y + z) = 42
All scores are integers from 0–10, with x ≤ y and x ≤ z.
Step 2 — Find multiple valid (x, y, z) combinations.
- x = 2, y = 10, z = 10 → 2 + 40 = 42 ✓
- x = 4, y = 9, z = 10 → 4 + 38 = 42 ✓
- x = 6, y = 9, z = 9 → 6 + 36 = 42 ✓
- x = 8, y = 8, z = 9 → 8 + 34 = 42 ✓
Step 3 — Test each statement.
Statement I: She received a score below 8 on at least one assignment.
Counterexample: x = 8, y = 8, z = 9. All scores ≥ 8. Statement I fails here.
→ Does NOT have to be true.
Statement II: She received a score of 9 on at least one assignment.
Counterexample: x = 2, y = 10, z = 10. No score of 9 anywhere.
→ Does NOT have to be true.
Statement III: She received a score of at least 6 on every assignment.
Counterexample: x = 4, y = 9, z = 10. x = 4 is below 6, yet 4 + 38 = 42 ✓.
→ Does NOT have to be true.
Answer: E — None of the three.
Takeaway: On "Must be True" problems, your goal is counterexamples. The moment you find one valid scenario where a statement fails, cross it off. Never assume the first combination you find represents all possibilities.