Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 08:54 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 08:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
pardeepattri
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Sep 2010
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
96
 [14]
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 68
Kudos: 96
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
esledge
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Last visit: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
1,580
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Posts: 144
Kudos: 1,580
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dalmba
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Last visit: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Halifax, Canada
Concentration: Social Media / Marketing
Schools:Dalhousie School of Business (Corporate Residency MBA)
GPA: 3.7
Posts: 84
Kudos: 80
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
esledge
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Last visit: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Posts: 144
Kudos: 1,580
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dalmba
That is totally weird. I can't be bothered to check if it's true (I assume it is)... I'd love to see the proof as to why it works. Not because I'm that big of a math geek, but because I'm sure it would boggle my mind even further. :-D
I totally agree! Both of these methods are so wacky, unlike the more intuitive tests for divisibility by other single digit numbers.

I have to wonder, wouldn't simple long division by 7 be fastest?
avatar
skipjames
Joined: 08 May 2010
Last visit: 10 Mar 2011
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 101
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have book for my kids that gives the rules for divisibility by 7 as:
Multiply the final digit by 5 and then add the answer to the number preceding it. If the answer is divisible by 7 then the whole number is divisible by 7. (the book is called Speed Math for Kids by Bill Handley)

So for your example 13587. 1358 +35=1393. 1393 is divisible by 7 (=199.) so the larger number is.

Ultimately I do not see this speeding you up at all. It is absolutely slower AND more error prone for me. I would just divide it out. Not thinking this will be very relevant on the GMAT anyway.

If you found my comments helpful, please give kudos. ( only need a few more)
Thanks,
Skip
User avatar
rbibhu
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its absolutely not required to remember this formula. Just divide as you do normal division. It will be much faster.
User avatar
dabral
User avatar
Tutor
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 557
Own Kudos:
666
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 557
Kudos: 666
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, no need to learn the divisibility rule for 7 as far as the GMAT is concerned. For every single computation I have seen on the GMAT, it would be faster to just divide by 7 than resorting to these rules.

Dabral
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,279
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,279
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with Dabral above - divisibility tests for numbers like 7 and 11 aren't useful unless you're testing six-digit numbers for divisibility by 7 or 11, which you never need to do on the GMAT. If you see a smaller number like 1785 and wanted to know if it's divisible by 7, you can just take out obvious multiples of 7 until you get down to familiar numbers:

1785 = 1400 + 385 = 1400 + 350 + 35

and since we have no remainder, 1785 is divisible by 7.

That's much faster, for small numbers, than any divisibility 'trick' I've ever seen, and it works for any number at all (not only for 7), so you don't need to learn different 'tricks' for different numbers. One other advantage of doing this is you can work out what 1785/7 is equal to, if you need to:

1785 = 1400 + 350 + 35 = 7(200 + 50 + 5) = 7*255

Of course long division will also work, but there are alternatives that can be faster.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,985
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,985
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109827 posts
Tuck School Moderator
852 posts