Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
85%
(01:09)
correct 15%
(01:21)
wrong
based on 52
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
7.184XY
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.
Let me know what you guys think and I will post the OA and OE. I have some questions on this.
Kudos me if you like this!
Show more
(1) X+Y is 5. Doesnt tell us much about X. It could be {0,1,2,3,4,5} (2) Result of rounding is 7.185 --> This means that X can be {5,6,7,8,9}
(1+2) Combining both, onlt possibility for X is 5.
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.
Let me know what you guys think and I will post the OA and OE. I have some questions on this.
Kudos me if you like this!
Show more
There are serious problems with this question. Clearly the intended answer is C, but that would mean our number is 7.81450. There are two problems with this:
* if you have the number 7.81450, then you don't normally write the final zero; that number is 7.8145. A test taker could very reasonably assume that y is nonzero here and quite legitimately choose A as the answer.
* More importantly, you can't round the number 7.8145 to the 'nearest thousandth'; it's equally close to 7.814 and 7.815. Whether you round this to 7.814 or to 7.815 depends on which rounding conventions you are using, and those conventions are different in different contexts (in American education, children are often taught to round up in this case, but that is definitely *not* generally true in real mathematics). The GMAT will never ask about rounding off a number that is exactly halfway between two potential candidates -- you won't be asked to round 1.5 to the nearest integer, for example -- because depending how you learned rounding, you could give three different completely legitimate answers: 1, 2 or 'it can't be done'.
This is just a badly designed question.
Edit: I guess all of my issues with the question would be resolved if the number they asked about was something like "7.184XY4" instead of "7.184XY". If they add one nonzero digit after the 'Y', there's nothing wrong with the question.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.