Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
85%
(01:09)
correct 15%
(01:21)
wrong
based on 52
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
7.184XY
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.
Let me know what you guys think and I will post the OA and OE. I have some questions on this.
Kudos me if you like this!
Show more
(1) X+Y is 5. Doesnt tell us much about X. It could be {0,1,2,3,4,5} (2) Result of rounding is 7.185 --> This means that X can be {5,6,7,8,9}
(1+2) Combining both, onlt possibility for X is 5.
In the decimal above, each of X and Y represent a single digit, and X ≠ Y. What is the value of X? (1) The sum of the digits X and Y is 5. (2) The result of rounding the decimal number to the nearest thousandth is 7.185.
Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.
Let me know what you guys think and I will post the OA and OE. I have some questions on this.
Kudos me if you like this!
Show more
There are serious problems with this question. Clearly the intended answer is C, but that would mean our number is 7.81450. There are two problems with this:
* if you have the number 7.81450, then you don't normally write the final zero; that number is 7.8145. A test taker could very reasonably assume that y is nonzero here and quite legitimately choose A as the answer.
* More importantly, you can't round the number 7.8145 to the 'nearest thousandth'; it's equally close to 7.814 and 7.815. Whether you round this to 7.814 or to 7.815 depends on which rounding conventions you are using, and those conventions are different in different contexts (in American education, children are often taught to round up in this case, but that is definitely *not* generally true in real mathematics). The GMAT will never ask about rounding off a number that is exactly halfway between two potential candidates -- you won't be asked to round 1.5 to the nearest integer, for example -- because depending how you learned rounding, you could give three different completely legitimate answers: 1, 2 or 'it can't be done'.
This is just a badly designed question.
Edit: I guess all of my issues with the question would be resolved if the number they asked about was something like "7.184XY4" instead of "7.184XY". If they add one nonzero digit after the 'Y', there's nothing wrong with the question.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.