Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 14:12 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 14:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
satishreddy
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Last visit: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
295
 [23]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 10
Kudos: 295
 [23]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,066
 [16]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
3111987
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Last visit: 10 Jun 2014
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 490 Q32 V25
GPA: 3.9
WE:Other (Other)
GMAT 1: 490 Q32 V25
Posts: 11
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,066
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3111987
Bunuel
satishreddy
Company Z only sells chairs and tables. what percent of its revenue in 2008 did company derive from its sales of tables?
1. In 2008, the average price of tables sold by company Z was 10% higher than the average price of chairs sold by Company Z?
2. In 2008, Company Z sold 20% fewer tables than chairs.

Revenue=number of items sold * price of an item.

\(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=?\)

(1) \(p_t=1.1*p_c\). Not sufficient.
(2) \(n_t=0.8*n_c\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c}{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*1.1}{0.8*1.1*+1}\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.


dear Bunuel,
thanks for the explanation but I have a question:

\(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=?\)
is this part not going to be equal to 1?

many thanks

No. \(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=\frac{x}{x+y}\). This expression is not necessarily equal to 1.
avatar
JouviMat
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 10 Jul 2018
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 29
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey guys,

i know this topic is frm 5 years ago, but i got stuck on MGMAT explanation.

Ok, I found how Rc and Rt are related, but I cant figure how it is conclusive to find how Rc is related for total revenue.

Since

Revenue = Rt + Rc

Rt = Qt x Pt

Rc = Qc x PC

And we found that Rt = 0.88 Rc

If I replace Rt in revenue equation my result will be

Revenue = 0.88 Rc + Rc

What could I conclude with this final equation??
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 1,359
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
satishreddy
Company Z only sells chairs and tables. what percent of its revenue in 2008 did company derive from its sales of tables?
1. In 2008, theaverage price of tables sold by company Z was 10% higher than the average price of chairs sold by Company Z?
2. In 2008, Company Z sold 20% fewer tables than chairs.

Quote:
Revenue=number of items sold * price of an item.

\(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=?\)

(1) \(p_t=1.1*p_c\). Not sufficient.
(2) \(n_t=0.8*n_c\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c}{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*1.1}{0.8*1.1*+1}\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
Bunuel niks18 gmatbusters

Average price = (Price per table or chair) / total no of table or chairs.
I could not understand how could you derive Eq 1 of St 1 without having an idea about individual quantity?
User avatar
niks18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
1,805
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
Products:
Posts: 862
Kudos: 1,805
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
satishreddy
Company Z only sells chairs and tables. what percent of its revenue in 2008 did company derive from its sales of tables?
1. In 2008, theaverage price of tables sold by company Z was 10% higher than the average price of chairs sold by Company Z?
2. In 2008, Company Z sold 20% fewer tables than chairs.

Quote:
Revenue=number of items sold * price of an item.

\(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=?\)

(1) \(p_t=1.1*p_c\). Not sufficient.
(2) \(n_t=0.8*n_c\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c}{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*1.1}{0.8*1.1*+1}\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
Bunuel niks18 gmatbusters

Average price = (Price per table or chair) / total no of table or chairs.
I could not understand how could you derive Eq 1 of St 1 without having an idea about individual quantity?

hi adkikani

here \(p_t\) & \(p_c\) are the average price of table and chair respectively or simply put they are the price of each table and chair. now it is assumed that \(n_t\) & \(n_c\) represent total number of tables and chairs.

So revenue = price per item * total number of items

Hence revenue from table \(= p_t*n_t\)

Also statement 1 gives you the relationship between average prices, so to derive the equation you need not require quantity.

the relationship between the prices will be \(p_t=1.1*p_c\)
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,047
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,047
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

We're told that Company Z only sells chairs and tables. We're asked for the percent of its revenue in 2008 that the company derived from its sales of tables. While this DS question is layered, it offers an interesting shortcut in that it's not asking for the specific price or number of tables and chairs; it's asking for "what percent of its revenue" was from the sale of tables, so you can answer it either with real values or with ratios. Here's a way to think in terms of what's being asked for:

(Total Revenue from tables)/(Total Revenue from tables and chairs) = ?

1) In 2008, the average price of tables sold by company Z was 10% higher than the average price of chairs sold by Company Z.

Fact 1 compares the average price of tables to the average price of chairs, but it DOESN'T tell us about total revenue. Mathematically, we'd have:

(Table Price) = 1.1(Chair Price)

We still don't know how many tables and chairs were sold though.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT.

2) In 2008, Company Z sold 20% fewer tables than chairs.

Based on the information in Fact 2, we'd have:

(Number of Tables) = .8(Number of Chairs)

We still don't know the price of the tables or chairs.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT.

Combined, we know:

(Table Price) = 1.1(Chair Price)
(Number of Tables) = .8(Number of Chairs)

Table Revenue = (Number of Tables)(Table price)
Total Revenue = (Number of Tables)(Table price) + (Number of chairs)(Chair price)

Now, we can substitute in values of the "chair" info:

Total Revenue = (Number of Tables)(Table price) + (Number of Tables/.8)(Table price/1.1)

Solving for Table Revenue/Total Revenue, all the variables would cancel out and you'd have:

.88/1.88

Don't bother calculating this though. It's enough to give you the only possible answer.

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
A2D2
Joined: 11 Jan 2022
Last visit: 28 Apr 2025
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Posts: 35
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
satishreddy
Company Z only sells chairs and tables. what percent of its revenue in 2008 did company derive from its sales of tables?
1. In 2008, the average price of tables sold by company Z was 10% higher than the average price of chairs sold by Company Z?
2. In 2008, Company Z sold 20% fewer tables than chairs.

Revenue=number of items sold * price of an item.

\(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=?\)

(1) \(p_t=1.1*p_c\). Not sufficient.
(2) \(n_t=0.8*n_c\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) \(\frac{n_t*p_t}{n_t*p_t+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c}{0.8*n_c*1.1*p_c+n_c*p_c}=\frac{0.8*1.1}{0.8*1.1*+1}\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Can we also do it by assuming original price and no. Of tables and chairs to be 100 each and then add percent accordingly
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,974
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,974
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109818 posts
498 posts
212 posts