vards
Hi Mike,
great solution..!! could u please tell me,how did u substitute nos in 2nd set so that the outcome was an even integer?is there any technique for substituting nos ?did u randomly choose them?m just asking because trying to randomly insert various integers until the outcome turns out to be even doesnt seem to be a productive idea..
Thanks..!

Dear
yards,
I'm happy to respond.

You asked "
How did you substitute numbers in the second set so that the outcome was an even integer?" Of course, once I had numbers that worked, I just plugged them in. I believe what you meant to ask was:
how did I create that particular combination of numbers?
How did I go about generating a set which would satisfy both statements and produce an even output in the prompt?
This is very subtle. This involves
number sense. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/number-sense-for-the-gmat/Number sense is a very right-brain process, which involves many subtle pattern-matching skills. There's absolutely no way to spell out the "recipe" for number sense: it is something one has to develop over time, and that blog article gives some recommendations. Here are just a few considerations I used.
(1) if we want an even product,
only one of the factors has to be even. The other factor can be anything, even or odd --- as long as just one factor is even, the product will be even. That's a big idea.
(2) with that in mind, I made w = x = 2, so that would definitely be even
(3) with those numbers, I had to make y even, to satisfy statement #1
(4) all this meant I had to make x odd, to satisfy statement #2
That was my reasoning, and that's an example of working with number-sense. How would a student know where to start this process? Again, that's a deeply right-brain skill, and comes only will repeated practice, especially from simply playing with arithmetic and being curious about the patterns of numbers. For example, in this problem, there are 16 possible sets, where each entry is either 1 or 2. It might be worthwhile to go through all 16 possibilities, and for each one, see: does it satisfy statement #1? does it satisfy statement #2? what does it do to the prompt? Part of number sense comes from just playing with numbers, just out of sheer curiosity, even if it is entirely irrelevant to the problem. Play is a state of mind that has nothing to do with any goal.
You may find this blog article helpful as well:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/how-to-do- ... th-faster/One of the many ironies of studying for the GMAT: if one has the very tangible goal of a good GMAT score, an essential part of achieving that goal comes from letting go of having a goal in a number of different ways in one's studies. If one stays locked in goal-oriented mode, in some ways that actually impedes achieving the goal. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/getting-a-good-gmat-score/Does all this make sense?
Mike