Last visit was: 04 Sep 2026, 08:51 It is currently 04 Sep 2026, 08:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AbhiJ
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2010
Last visit: 30 Jul 2022
Posts: 793
Own Kudos:
651
 [14]
Given Kudos: 192
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,129
Own Kudos:
839,078
 [6]
Given Kudos: 111,327
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,129
Kudos: 839,078
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
bluesquare
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Last visit: 01 Dec 2016
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
66
 [5]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
Products:
Posts: 39
Kudos: 66
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
AbhiJ
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 May 2010
Last visit: 30 Jul 2022
Posts: 793
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 192
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My bad, mistook factors for multiples.
avatar
hsbinfy
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Last visit: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
326
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: Schulich '16
Schools: Schulich '16
Posts: 190
Kudos: 326
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A it is.

1. n can be 99 ,9999,999999 and so on..coz then only it will make a perfect square and result in an interger after division by 10.

so 99=11 * 9
9999= 11 * 9 * 101
999999=11 * 9 * 10101(which is further simplified to 3*7*13*37)

but we are asked the smallest....so 11 and 9 will always appear..sufficient i.e. 2
the smallest diff cant be 1 coz there need to be 2 and 3 as factors...and n is would be never divisible by2.

2.insuff

n can be multiple multiple of 8 or not.
either would get diff results.


So its A.
avatar
Vaibhav21
Joined: 01 Jan 2015
Last visit: 09 Oct 2019
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 47
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
St 1 root(n+1)/10 is a pos int(1,2,3,4.....)
only possible when numerator is a multiple of 10(10,20,30) and to get 10 as numerator n=99;20 as numerator n=399; 30 as numerator n=899
and if you carefully notice all the values of n have 2 factors common i.e 3 and 1 hence the min diff = 2 Satisfied
St 2 N is a multiple of both 11 and 9 so? if n= 11x9x2 factors = 1,2,3,11 smallest diff = 1 AND if N=11X9 factors 1,3,11 samllest diff = 2 THUS NS

Ans = A
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,129
Own Kudos:
839,078
 [2]
Given Kudos: 111,327
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,129
Kudos: 839,078
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If n is a positive integer greater than 1, what is the smallest positive difference between two different factors of n?

(1) \(\frac{\sqrt{n+1}}{10}\) is a positive integer.

(2) n is a multiple of both 11 and 9.


Kudos for a correct solution.
\

MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

Factors are integers, by definition, so the smallest possible difference between any two factors has to be at least 1. For example, if n = 2, then the number has factors 1 and 2, and the smallest positive difference between those factors is 1. If, on the other hand, n =3, then the number has factors 1 and 3, and the smallest positive difference between those two factors is 2.

On this problem, statement 2 is (arguably) easier, so you might choose to start there.

(2) NOT SUFFICIENT. If n is a multiple of both 11 and 9, then it could be 99. In this case, the factors would be 1, 9, 11, and 99, and the smallest difference between two factors would be 2. On the other hand, n could be 198, with factors 1 and 2 (among others). In this case, the smallest difference is only 1.

(1) SUFFICIENT. What can this strange expression indicate about the value of n? We’re going to need to dig into number theory a bit here.

If that whole expression represents a positive integer, then squaring it would represent a perfect square of an integer:

\(\frac{n+1}{100} = perfect \ square\)

Use the variable p to represent the perfect square, just to make this easier to write:

\(\frac{n+1}{100}=p\)
\(n+1=100p\)
\(n=100p-1\)
\(n=(10\sqrt{p}+1)(10\sqrt{p}-1)\)

Remember that p is a perfect square, so the square root of p is still an integer. This last equation means that one factor of n is \(10\sqrt{p}+1\) and another factor of n is \(10\sqrt{p}-1\) (where \(10\sqrt{p}\) is an integer). These two factors, then, are really “an integer + 1” and “that same integer – 1.” In other words, these two integers are 2 units apart.

But is that the smallest possible distance between two factors? Here’s the best (and trickiest) part. Remember this stage of the equation simplification above?

n=100p-1

That step means: n equals an even number minus 1. In other words, n is odd!

The only way that two factors can be a distance of just 1 unit apart is when one of those factors is even and one of those factors is odd. If n itself is odd, though, then it cannot have any even factors.

Because n is odd, it isn’t possible for two of the factors to be just 1 unit apart. Therefore, the smallest possible distance between two factors is indeed 2.

The correct answer is A.
User avatar
architkap
Joined: 07 Apr 2026
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 44
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Have a doubt with 1)

just testing values, n can be 99, 399, 899 etc. If n=99 then 3^2*11 so smallest difference is 2. If n = 399 then smallest difference is 4 (3*7*19). If n = 899 then smallest difference is 2 again (29*31) so how can we come to a conclusion here?

If Bunuel KarishmaB yall can help me out here
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,290
Kudos: 33,899
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi architkap,

Your setup is right: statement (1) does force n to be 99, 399, 899 and so on. The slip is the smallest difference you found for 399.

Recheck n = 399. You factored it as 3 × 7 × 19 and got 4. But list all the factors, not just the primes:

- Factors of 399: 1, 3, 7, 19, 21, 57, 133, 399
- 1 and 3 are both factors and differ by exactly 2. So do 19 and 21.

So 399 gives 2, not 4. The 4 came from comparing prime factors while skipping the fact that 1 is always a factor, and any n divisible by 3 automatically has 1 and 3 sitting 2 apart.

All three of your cases now agree: 99, 399 and 899 each give 2.

Why it is always 2. Statement (1) gives n = (10k - 1)(10k + 1).

- Those two factors are exactly 2 apart, so the answer can never be more than 2.
- n = 100k^2 - 1 is odd, so it has no even factors. A difference of 1 needs one even and one odd factor, impossible here, so the answer can never be less than 2.

Squeezed between "at most 2" and "at least 2," it is exactly 2 for every allowed n. Same answer every time, so statement (1) is sufficient.

The takeaway: when hunting the smallest gap between factors, include 1 and the composite factors, not just the primes.

Answer: A

architkap
Have a doubt with 1)

just testing values, n can be 99, 399, 899 etc. If n=99 then 3^2*11 so smallest difference is 2. If n = 399 then smallest difference is 4 (3*7*19). If n = 899 then smallest difference is 2 again (29*31) so how can we come to a conclusion here?

If Bunuel KarishmaB yall can help me out here
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,638
Own Kudos:
81,165
 [1]
Given Kudos: 489
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,638
Kudos: 81,165
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
architkap
Have a doubt with 1)

just testing values, n can be 99, 399, 899 etc. If n=99 then 3^2*11 so smallest difference is 2. If n = 399 then smallest difference is 4 (3*7*19). If n = 899 then smallest difference is 2 again (29*31) so how can we come to a conclusion here?

If Bunuel KarishmaB yall can help me out here

As per statement 1, \(\frac{\sqrt{n+1}}{10}\) is a positive integer so the square root should give a clean multiple of 10. Hence n+1 must be 100*(a perfect square) i.e. 100 or 400 or 900 etc.
So n = 99 or 399 or 899 etc. It will be 1 less than a multiple of 100 so it will definitely be an odd number.

99 has 9 and 11 as factors so the minimum difference between two factors in case of 99 is 2.
Now the question is whether the difference can be 1 or 0. We know that till now it can be 2.

Since all possible values of n are odd and none of them can be a perfect square (since n+1 is a perfect square), so n cannot have two factors which are the same and it cannot have two consecutive numbers (odd and even) as factors.

That is why the minimum possible difference in case of any value of n is 2. Some values of n may have a minimum difference of more than 2 between their factors, but the minimum possible value is 2.

Hence statement 1 is sufficient.
Moderators:
Math Expert
113129 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts