Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 22:59 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 22:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,936
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,963
Kudos: 811,843
 [14]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
14101992
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Last visit: 08 Apr 2018
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
636
 [4]
Given Kudos: 10
Products:
Posts: 177
Kudos: 636
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
skothaka
Joined: 18 Jul 2016
Last visit: 18 May 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 14
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mohshu
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Last visit: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 410
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Products:
Posts: 410
Kudos: 143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
simplify the given stem

ay>bx
ay-bx >0 ????
stat 1: ay-bx > -1,,not suff

stat 2 : divide the entire equation by ax/by

gives ax/by >1

ax>by
ax-by >0.. suff

ans B
User avatar
14101992
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Last visit: 08 Apr 2018
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Products:
Posts: 177
Kudos: 636
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
skothaka
rewrite the question as (ay/bx)>1

statement 1
> divide the entire inequality by bx
we get
(ay/bx) + (1/bx) > 1
that is (positive number) + (positive Number) >1. This does not say anything about (ay/bx) as it can be 0.5 or 1.5 and so on

This is not sufficient as we need to know whether (ay/bx)>1

Statement 2
(ay/bx)^2 > (ay/bx)
>(ay/bx)^2 - (ay/bx)>0
>(ay/bx)*((ay/bx)-1)>0

this means that either both the boldface terms are greater than zero or both are less than zero.
as a,y,b and x are positive (ay/bx) cannot be less than zero. Hence both cannot be less than zero.
Now both are greater than zero. which means,
(ay/bx)> 0 and (ay/bx) - 1 > 0

Remember that this is an AND condition. Both have to be true.

therefore ay/bx >1
statement 2 alone is sufficient.
So answer should be B

The solution provided for S1 is not complete. We cannot conclude anything with the equation (ay/bx) + (1/bx) > 1. See the above solution for a better explanation.
User avatar
skothaka
Joined: 18 Jul 2016
Last visit: 18 May 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 14
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
14101992
skothaka
rewrite the question as (ay/bx)>1

statement 1
> divide the entire inequality by bx
we get
(ay/bx) + (1/bx) > 1
that is (positive number) + (positive Number) >1. This does not say anything about (ay/bx) as it can be 0.5 or 1.5 and so on

This is not sufficient as we need to know whether (ay/bx)>1

Statement 2
(ay/bx)^2 > (ay/bx)
>(ay/bx)^2 - (ay/bx)>0
>(ay/bx)*((ay/bx)-1)>0

this means that either both the boldface terms are greater than zero or both are less than zero.
as a,y,b and x are positive (ay/bx) cannot be less than zero. Hence both cannot be less than zero.
Now both are greater than zero. which means,
(ay/bx)> 0 and (ay/bx) - 1 > 0

Remember that this is an AND condition. Both have to be true.

therefore ay/bx >1
statement 2 alone is sufficient.
So answer should be B

The solution provided for S1 is not complete. We cannot conclude anything with the equation (ay/bx) + (1/bx) > 1. See the above solution for a better explanation.


The solution for S1 says that ay/bx could be anything between 0 and infinite. So S1 is not sufficient. That is enough to rule it out. Your solution is much simpler btw.
avatar
OindrillaDe
Joined: 31 May 2019
Last visit: 21 Dec 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If a, b, x, and y are all positive, is \(\frac{a}{b} > \frac{x}{y}\) ?

(1) \(ay + 1 > bx\)

(2) \((\frac{ay}{bx})^2 > \frac{ay}{bx}\)

Bunuel - Could you help me understand that if the statement did not mention that a,b,x and y are all positive - would the answer then be E
User avatar
HWPO
Joined: 11 May 2020
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 117
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I hope my reasoning is ok, but this is how I interpreted statement 2: Bunuel approve?

For POSITIVE fractions only: a positive fraction squared will ALWAYS be smaller than the fraction itself.

Example: \(\frac{1}{2} > \frac{1}{4}\) , \(\frac{1}{3} > \frac{1}{9}\) , and so on.

IF, as in statement 2, our fractions squared is actually greater than our fraction itself, then the numerator had to be greater than the denominator to begin with.

Therefore, ay > bx ==== > Statement B is sufficient.
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 463
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 215
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 463
Kudos: 3,069
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HWPO
I hope my reasoning is ok, but this is how I interpreted statement 2: Bunuel approve?

For POSITIVE fractions only: a positive fraction squared will ALWAYS be smaller than the fraction itself.

Example: \(\frac{1}{2} > \frac{1}{4}\) , \(\frac{1}{3} > \frac{1}{9}\) , and so on.

IF, as in statement 2, our fractions squared is actually greater than our fraction itself, then the numerator had to be greater than the denominator to begin with.

Therefore, ay > bx ==== > Statement B is sufficient.
HWPO: yes, that is solid reasoning and an interesting solution! It's great that you have a strong grasp of the important rule above.

My personal approach to statement (2) is to immediately cross off the exponent on the left side and put "1" on the right side, then multiply the "bx" over to the right side:

\((\frac{ay}{bx})^2>\frac{ay}{bx}\)
\((\frac{ay}{bx})>1\)
\(ay>bx\)

As others have noted above, we have to be careful with inequalities — we can only safely do this because the stem says all numbers are POSITIVE.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109963 posts
498 posts
212 posts