Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 01:42 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 01:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,868
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,913
 [20]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
PKN
Joined: 01 Oct 2017
Last visit: 11 Oct 2025
Posts: 809
Own Kudos:
1,636
 [6]
Given Kudos: 41
Status:Learning stage
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
Posts: 809
Kudos: 1,636
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GmatDaddy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 328
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Products:
Posts: 328
Kudos: 412
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
epiphany1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2021
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
71
 [1]
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 87
Kudos: 71
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GmatDaddy
Bunuel
A local municipality did a census of earthworms per acre of soil for 15 similar sites and found that the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre was 2,000. Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?

(1) By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.

(2) The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.

Statement 1: By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.
That means the spread of individual values has increased, Hence the SD will increase.
Sufficient.

Statement 2: The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.
When the individual elements of a set are multiplied by a constant number, the new SD becomes constant times the old SD
Here, in our case, if the increase in the no of worms is greater than 100%, the SD will increase otherwise decrease.
Insufficient.

IMO Answer: A

This is yes no question.
Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?
In case of A answer is yes
In case of B answer is no
thus both choices answers the question stem Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?
thus answer is D
User avatar
GmatDaddy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 328
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Products:
Posts: 328
Kudos: 412
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alitariquet: You are right.

My bad, the no of worms will always increase. Answer will be D
I'll edit my post right away.

alitariquet
GmatDaddy
Bunuel
A local municipality did a census of earthworms per acre of soil for 15 similar sites and found that the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre was 2,000. Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?

(1) By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.

(2) The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.

Statement 1: By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.
That means the spread of individual values has increased, Hence the SD will increase.
Sufficient.

Statement 2: The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.
When the individual elements of a set are multiplied by a constant number, the new SD becomes constant times the old SD
Here, in our case, if the increase in the no of worms is greater than 100%, the SD will increase otherwise decrease.
Insufficient.

IMO Answer: A

This is yes no question.
Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?
In case of A answer is yes
In case of B answer is no
thus both choices answers the question stem Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?
thus answer is D
User avatar
epiphany1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2021
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 87
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PKN
Bunuel
A local municipality did a census of earthworms per acre of soil for 15 similar sites and found that the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre was 2,000. Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?

(1) By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.

(2) The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.

Question stem:- Is SD>2000 ?

St1:- By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.
Range=greatest no of worms-Least no of worms, is increased by 20%.
What about the individual data of #worms per acre in the respective sites?Are the no of worms at 15 sites close to mean no of worms? Are the no of worms at 15 sites spread-ed away from mean no of worms?

well choice A says Range of no of worms per acre increase by 20% this means we have increase in worms in each acre not total range increase in 15 sites if A has to ruled out it must that " By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre(removed) for the sites had increased by 20%
ie By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms for the sites had increased by 20%.
User avatar
PKN
Joined: 01 Oct 2017
Last visit: 11 Oct 2025
Posts: 809
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Status:Learning stage
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
Posts: 809
Kudos: 1,636
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alitariquet
PKN
Bunuel
A local municipality did a census of earthworms per acre of soil for 15 similar sites and found that the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre was 2,000. Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?

(1) By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.

(2) The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.

Question stem:- Is SD>2000 ?

St1:- By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.
Range=greatest no of worms-Least no of worms, is increased by 20%.
What about the individual data of #worms per acre in the respective sites?Are the no of worms at 15 sites close to mean no of worms? Are the no of worms at 15 sites spread-ed away from mean no of worms?

well choice A says Range of no of worms per acre increase by 20% this means we have increase in worms in each acre not total range increase in 15 sites if A has to ruled out it must that " By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre(removed) for the sites had increased by 20%
ie By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms for the sites had increased by 20%.

Hi alitariquet,
Here the #worms are measured in per acre only. UoM of #worms is worms/acre.

Per acre doesn't refer to each of the sites.
User avatar
epiphany1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2021
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 87
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for pointing out that was tricky
avatar
anmolsd1995
Joined: 17 Apr 2017
Last visit: 12 Dec 2021
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 11
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was doing other related questions to S.D, just got to learn a correlation between S.D and range

i.e-S.D of certain list <=(1/2)range of that list.

Since A tells us that Range had increased, doesn't that mean S.D has Increased as well ?

Please correct me where i am going wrong
avatar
Debashis Roy
Joined: 23 Aug 2017
Last visit: 15 Dec 2019
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Posts: 90
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma...

Could you please help analyse Statement I
Thanks in advance
avatar
Sejal16
Joined: 20 Dec 2019
Last visit: 23 Dec 2020
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Schools: ISB'22 (I)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 57
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is no direct relationship between range and standard deviation. But because both are measures of spread, the range can help (depending on the data) to draw conclusions about the SD.
User avatar
uc26
User avatar
INSEAD School Moderator
Joined: 19 Sep 2018
Last visit: 11 Nov 2021
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
75
 [1]
Given Kudos: 945
Posts: 89
Kudos: 75
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Debashis Roy
VeritasKarishma...

Could you please help analyse Statement I
Thanks in advance

This is a great question to clarify concepts on standard deviation (SD). Statement 1 plays on the concept of range and tries to link it to standard deviation. Increase in range does not mean an increase in the SD. We need to consider the other terms other than the highest and lowest terms. What if the last/highest term has moved 20 percent further away from the first/lowest term but all the other terms have come much closer to the mean. In that case, an increase in range will not lead to an increase in SD. So we get a NO answer for the question.
We can get a YES answer relatively easily by considering an increase of 20 percent in all the terms above the mean. Since they are higher than the mean, an increase would push them further away from the mean, thereby increasing the standard deviation.
So Statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Regards,
Udit
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,905
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A local municipality did a census of earthworms per acre of soil for 15 similar sites and found that the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre was 2,000. Was the standard deviation of the number of worms per acre at the 15 sites higher at the end of the year?

(1) By the end of the year, the range of the number of worms per acre for the sites had increased by 20%.

(2) The number of worms in each plot increased by the same percentage.

For the purposes of the GMAT:
Standard deviation = average distance from the mean

Statement 1:
Here, we know only that the distance between the smallest and largest values increased by 20%.
No way to determine whether FOR ALL 15 VALUES the average distance from the mean increased.
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
Since each data point increased by \(x\)%, the average distance from the mean increased by \(x%\)%.
Thus, the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT

avatar
robotman88
Joined: 28 May 2021
Last visit: 08 May 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 16
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO [B] because when you multiply the numbers of a set by a number, the SD of the set increases by that same number
User avatar
akshatv45
Joined: 22 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 284
Location: India
Schools: IIM (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q86 V85 DI82
GPA: 7.44
Products:
Schools: IIM (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q86 V85 DI82
Posts: 28
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To understand if standard deviation has increased or decreased, we need to know the spread of the data and not just the range.

lets take a smaller example and say earlier no. of worms were {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11} in 10 sites.
By year end range increased by 20% so {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,13} in 10 sites. In this case the standard deviation will increase.

But we don't know the spread. So the data points could be {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11} at the census and {1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,13} at the end of the year. In this case the standard deviation will decrease.

So to be sure about the increase in std. deviation we should know the spread. This is captured in the second statement and hence it is sufficient where as statement 1 is not.
User avatar
BinodBhai
Joined: 19 Feb 2025
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Posts: 107
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No, statement (1) is **not sufficient** to answer the question.

Here's why:

* **Standard Deviation vs. Range:**
* **Range** is the difference between the maximum and minimum values in a dataset.
* **Standard Deviation** measures the average spread or dispersion of data points around the mean.
* **Relationship between Range and Standard Deviation:** While an increase in the range *can* sometimes indicate an increase in standard deviation, it's not a direct or guaranteed relationship.
* Consider a scenario where the minimum value decreases significantly and/or the maximum value increases significantly, leading to a larger range. However, the data points in between might have clustered more tightly around the mean, potentially leading to a *smaller* standard deviation.
* Conversely, the range might stay the same, but the data points could have spread out more evenly, increasing the standard deviation.

Therefore, knowing only that the range increased by 20% does not give us enough information to determine if the standard deviation also increased.

Hence (B)
Moderators:
Math Expert
109802 posts
498 posts
212 posts