This is a question that tests you on your knowledge of a finer aspect of positive integers. It’s also a question where your knowledge of prime factorization can help you interpret the second statement better, without falling for the trap answer.
Any positive integer, except 1, will always have 2 factors – 1 and the number itself. If it has only these two numbers as factors, it is termed a prime number; if it has some more numbers as factors, apart from these two, it is called a composite number.
You are already aware of the above concepts, from our posts on Prime numbers.
From statement I alone, we know that every factor of q is also a factor of p. From the question data, we know that both p and q are positive integers.
So, one of the factors of q, will be q itself. Therefore, if we say ‘every factor of q is also a factor of p’, we are essentially saying that q is also a factor of p.
Since q is a factor of p, p/q HAS to be an integer. So, statement I alone is sufficient. Hence, the possible answer options are A or D and answer options B, C and E can be ruled out.
From statement II alone, we know that q and p have the same prime factors. But, we do now know anything about the powers to which these prime factors are raised, in p and q respectively. For example,
If we assume that p and q both have 2 and 3 as their prime factors,
Let p = \(2 ^2\) * \(3^2\) and q = 2 * 3. Here, p = 36 and q = 6. p/q is definitely an integer.
When p = 2 * 3 and q = \(2^2\) * \(3^2\), p/q will not be an integer.
Therefore, statement II alone is insufficient. Answer option D gets eliminated and the correct answer option is A.
While interpreting statements like statement II, it is important to know how to distinguish between the factor of a number and the prime factor of a number. Not to forget that prime factors of a number can be raised to different powers, which have to be factored in while analyzing the data.
Hope this helps!