Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 15:30 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 15:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,927
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,950
Kudos: 811,785
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,374
Own Kudos:
2,195
 [3]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,374
Kudos: 2,195
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dimri10
Joined: 16 May 2011
Last visit: 25 Sep 2023
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE:Law (Law)
Posts: 237
Kudos: 356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,285
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There's simply no relationship between divisibility by 2 (or by 4) and divisibility by 3, so there's no reason either Statement would even be useful here. Of course we can check numbers to confirm: using both Statements, n can be 3, which is divisible by 3, or n can be 7, which is not divisible by 3. So the answer is E.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,188
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,188
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a question based on the concept of consecutive integers.
Any set of 3 consecutive integers will always have a multiple of 3. As such, from the data given, we need to determine if the set of integers is in such a way that ‘n’ is a multiple of 3.

From statement I alone, (n-1) is a multiple of 2. In other words, (n-1) is even.
If (n-1) = 2, n = 3. Is n a multiple of 3? YES.
If (n-1) = 4, n = 5. Is n a multiple of 3? NO.
Statement I alone is insufficient. Answer options A and D can be eliminated. Possible answer options are B, C or E.

From statement II alone, (n+1) is a multiple of 4.
If (n+1) = 4, n = 3. Is n a multiple of 3? YES.
If (n+1) = 12, n = 11. Is n a multiple of 3? NO.
Statement II alone is insufficient. Answer option B can be eliminated. Possible answer options are C or E.

Combining statements I and II, we have the following:
From statement I, (n-1) is even. From statement II, (n+1) is a multiple of 4.
If (n-1) = 2, n = 3 and (n+1) = 4. Both conditions are met. Is n a multiple of 3? YES.
If (n-1) = 10, n = 11 and (n+1) = 12. Both conditions are met. Is n a multiple of 3? NO.

The combination of statements is insufficient to give us a definite YES or NO. Answer option C can be eliminated.
The correct answer option is E.

Hope that helps!
User avatar
sambitspm
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Last visit: 13 Jan 2022
Posts: 317
Own Kudos:
311
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q50 V22
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V28 (Online)
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V28 (Online)
Posts: 317
Kudos: 311
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1 => n-1 = 2k
n= 2k+1

But we need to check if n = 3p
Insufficient

Statement 2 => n+1 = 4m
n= 4m-1

But we need to check if n = 3p
Insufficient

Combining
n = 2k+1 = 3,5,7,9,11,13,15
n = 4m-1 = 3,7,11,15

Taking common set
3,7,11,15
Some are, some aren't multiples of 3

Insufficient.
E
Moderators:
Math Expert
109950 posts
498 posts
212 posts