Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 01:01 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 01:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rajatchopra1994
Joined: 16 Feb 2015
Last visit: 22 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,052
Own Kudos:
1,306
 [16]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: United States
Posts: 1,052
Kudos: 1,306
 [16]
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,808
Own Kudos:
2,090
 [2]
Given Kudos: 678
Posts: 1,808
Kudos: 2,090
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,270
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rajatchopra1994
Each of the seven painting in an art gallery has a different price, is it possible to purchase at least 3 paintings for no more than $1800 in total?

1) The Median price of seven paintings is $550.

2) It is possible to purchase four more paintings at the gallery for a total of $2300.


Source: GMAT Advanced Quant: 250+ Practice Problems by Manhattan Prep (2020)
Although I answered correctly, Statement 2 seems bit off.
We need to have different prices.
As per the question we can just validate by buying the 3 least valued paintings.

Case I: All the four more paintings are the highest tagged price.
By default we have other 3 being the lowest tagged price, if the 4 more ones are priced 573, 574, 575 and 577.
Answer is YES.

Case II: All four more paintings are not highest tagged price.
If the 4 more ones are priced 1, 2, 3 and 2294, one among the remaining three must be at max. 1793 value. But we don't know the actual value.
So, the answer can be NO or YES.

Also, one possibility is that all the seven paintings total 2300, in which case we get a sure shot YES.

IanStewart
Am I missing something. Please help!!
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,270
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
unraveled

IanStewart
Am I missing something. Please help!!

I expect that Statement 2 was not copied correctly from the book - in the original post above, Statement 2 reads:

"2) It is possible to purchase four more paintings at the gallery for a total of $2300."

That word "more" that I've highlighted makes no sense - "more" than what? There's no sensible way to interpret it. So I've interpreted Statement 2 to mean

"2) It is possible to purchase four (of the seven) paintings at the gallery for a total of $2300."

Then if we simply buy the cheapest three of those four paintings, we must spend less than the $1800 the question asks about.

I gather you're interpreting Statement 2 and the question to mean something like: "if we can buy four of the paintings for $2300, is it possible to buy the other three paintings for less than $1800?" If that's what Statement 2 meant, then yes, it is certainly not sufficient, since you have almost no information, under that interpretation, about the cost of the three paintings you're trying to buy.

If, on the other hand, the question has been faithfully transcribed from the source, then the source desperately needs editing. There are at least three other typos in it (there's a comma splice, 'painting' needs to be pluralized, and Statement 1 is missing a definite article) in addition to the problem I mention above. But I'd be surprised if the source contained that many errors, and I expect the interpretation I made above is either the one written in the book, or at least the one intended by the book.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
unraveled

IanStewart
Am I missing something. Please help!!

I expect that Statement 2 was not copied correctly from the book - in the original post above, Statement 2 reads:

"2) It is possible to purchase four more paintings at the gallery for a total of $2300."

That word "more" that I've highlighted makes no sense - "more" than what? There's no sensible way to interpret it. So I've interpreted Statement 2 to mean

"2) It is possible to purchase four (of the seven) paintings at the gallery for a total of $2300."

Then if we simply buy the cheapest three of those four paintings, we must spend less than the $1800 the question asks about.

I gather you're interpreting Statement 2 and the question to mean something like: "if we can buy four of the paintings for $2300, is it possible to buy the other three paintings for less than $1800?" If that's what Statement 2 meant, then yes, it is certainly not sufficient, since you have almost no information, under that interpretation, about the cost of the three paintings you're trying to buy.

If, on the other hand, the question has been faithfully transcribed from the source, then the source desperately needs editing. There are at least three other typos in it (there's a comma splice, 'painting' needs to be pluralized, and Statement 1 is missing a definite article) in addition to the problem I mention above. But I'd be surprised if the source contained that many errors, and I expect the interpretation I made above is either the one written in the book, or at least the one intended by the book.
Thank you Ian.
This question is too open to be interpreted with a single conclusion.
Didn't expect Manhattan to write such open-ended questions, if poster has transcribed it properly.
avatar
Mio0821
Joined: 19 May 2021
Last visit: 26 Oct 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
I don't still understand the statement (2) part.

Because if, for example, the total $2,300 is allocated to 1, 2, 1148, 1149 respectively, it's not enough to say it's possible to purchase three paintings by $1800 only based on this statement.

I might missed anything, but can anyone explain this case?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,959
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,959
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109763 posts
498 posts
212 posts