Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 20:15 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 20:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hoozan
Joined: 28 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Dec 2025
Posts: 644
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 248
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Posts: 644
Kudos: 738
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
9,186
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,186
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kntombat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Feb 2020
Last visit: 19 Jan 2023
Posts: 862
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 839
Location: India
WE:Other (Other)
Posts: 862
Kudos: 530
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 29 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,088
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kntombat
CrackVerbalGMAT, how did you get the answer as E?
When you combine both conditions (1)k is not a prime + (2) k<4.
Then the numbers left to test is only 1 as 2 and 3 both are prime.
So what was your rationale behind equating k as 2 while testing both conditions (1) and (1)+(2)??

I feel the answer is C.

I don't know when CrackVerbalGMAT will have the time to see this, considering how busy they always are, until then can chetansharma, nick1816 or yashikaaggarwal help me out ?

Thank you.
Well Buddy you can quote "non-negative" Integer to be -ve integer as well. Using A and B statement doesn't say that k can't be -ve
Let say K = -1
So 47-(-1) /(-1) = -48 (right?)
That's why E is the answer.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,846
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,846
Kudos: 9,186
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kntombat
CrackVerbalGMAT, how did you get the answer as E?
When you combine both conditions (1)k is not a prime + (2) k<4.
Then the numbers left to test is only 1 as 2 and 3 both are prime.
So what was your rationale behind equating k as 2 while testing both conditions (1) and (1)+(2)??

I feel the answer is C.

I don't know when CrackVerbalGMAT will have the time to see this, considering how busy they always are, until then can chetansharma, nick1816 or yashikaaggarwal help me out ?

Thank you.

kntcombat, i have edited my rationale.
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 1,138
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hoozan
If k is a nonzero integer, is (47-k)/k an integer?

(1) k is not prime.
(2) k < 4

Is \(\frac{47-k}{k}\) an integer?

Is \(\frac{47}{k} - 1\) an integer?

Is \(\frac{47}{k}\) an integer?

Is k a factor of 47?

Statement 1:

Is k is not prime, with k = 1 k is still a factor of 47. Any other non-prime would make k not a factor of 47. Insufficient.

Statement 2:
k = 1 is a factor of 47, k = 2 is not. Insufficient.

Combined:

We can only choose from k =1 and negative integers, k = 1 would be a factor of 47 but k = -2 is not. Insufficient.

Ans: E
Moderators:
Math Expert
109910 posts
498 posts
212 posts