Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 07:22 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 07:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,827
Own Kudos:
811,197
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,827
Kudos: 811,197
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ChanSu
Joined: 22 Feb 2020
Last visit: 12 Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChanSu


Combined statements give n=1

Posted from my mobile device

ChanSu - Can you please elaborate on the reasoning?

IMO, If n = 1, Statement 2 gets violated

\((1+3)^1 \neq 1\)

Let me know if I am missing anything.
User avatar
ChanSu
Joined: 22 Feb 2020
Last visit: 12 Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
ChanSu


Combined statements give n=1

Posted from my mobile device

ChanSu - Can you please elaborate on the reasoning?

IMO, If n = 1, Statement 2 gets violated

\((1+3)^1 \neq 1\)

Let me know if I am missing anything.

Sry . My bad . N=-4 is correct

But your statement 2 should written as (-4+3) ^-4 = 1 which translates to n=-4
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,464
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ChanSu


Sry . My bad . N=-4 is correct

But your statement 2 should written as (-4+3) ^-4 = 1 which translates to n=-4

n = -4 is a valid value for Statement 2, so is n = -2 and n = 0.

In DS question, each statement needs to be evaluated in isolation. It is not necessary to find out / conclude all possible values that a variable can hold in a particular statement. For ex. In this question, the moment we conclude that n can have multiple values in Statment 2, we can reject that statement and move to the subsequent step. One may take n = -4 as a possible value in Statement 2 to conclude insufficiency, which is perfectly fine, but it's not necessary to do so.

Only when the statements are combined, any additional values from Statement 1 can be evaluated in light of Statement 2 (or vice versa).
User avatar
ChanSu
Joined: 22 Feb 2020
Last visit: 12 Aug 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
ChanSu


Sry . My bad . N=-4 is correct

But your statement 2 should written as (-4+3) ^-4 = 1 which translates to n=-4

n = -4 is a valid value for Statement 2, so is n = -2 and n = 0.

In DS question, each statement needs to be evaluated in isolation. It is not necessary to find out / conclude all possible values that a variable can hold in a particular statement. For ex. In this question, the moment we conclude that n can have multiple values in Statment 2, we can reject that statement and move to the subsequent step. One may take n = -4 as a possible value in Statement 2 to conclude insufficiency, which is perfectly fine, but it's not necessary to do so.

Only when the statements are combined, any additional values from Statement 1 can be evaluated in light of Statement 2 (or vice versa).
Got it. But n=-4 needs to be considered in this case because when you combine statements 1 and 2 (after you’re done evaluating statement 2) , n=-4 will be common to both

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
Math Expert
109827 posts
498 posts
212 posts