Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 22:10 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 22:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,765
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,765
Kudos: 810,695
 [58]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
11,450
 [14]
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,450
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,974
Own Kudos:
8,710
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,974
Kudos: 8,710
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 484
Own Kudos:
487
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 484
Kudos: 487
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­L = number of lightbulb shipments
C = number of electrical cord shipments
x​ = total time for lightbulbs
y​ = total time for electrical cords

\(\frac{x}{L}\) = average time per lightbulb shipment

\(\frac{y}{C​}\) = average time per electrical cord shipment

Question: x = ?


Statement (1): \(\frac{x}{L} = \frac{6}{5} * \frac{y}{C​}\)

=> Insufficient


Statement (2): x + y = 90

=> Insufficient


Combining Statements (1) and (2):

\(\frac{x}{L} = \frac{6}{5} * \frac{y}{C​}\)

x + y = 90

But we still do not know any about L & C

=> Insufficient


The correct answer is (E) Both statements together are not sufficient
User avatar
MBAApplicant2026
Joined: 24 Apr 2023
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Posts: 15
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Am I missing something here? Given that the average time spent on lightbulb shipments was 20% greater than the average time spent on cord shipments and a total of 90 minutes was spent preparing all the shipments, why can't we conclude that she spent 50 minutes preparing the bulb shipments and 40 minutes preparing the cord shipments?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,765
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,850
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,765
Kudos: 810,695
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HokieFan7
Yesterday Wanda prepared several shipments of lightbulbs and several shipments of electrical cords. How many minutes did Wanda spend preparing the shipments of lightbulbs yesterday?

(1) Yesterday the average (arithmetic mean) number of minutes that Wanda spent per shipment of lightbulbs was 20 percent greater than the average number of minutes that she spent per shipment of electrical cords.

(2) Yesterday Wanda spent a total of 90 minutes preparing all of the shipments.

Am I missing something here? Given that the average time spent on lightbulb shipments was 20% greater than the average time spent on cord shipments and a total of 90 minutes was spent preparing all the shipments, why can't we conclude that she spent 50 minutes preparing the bulb shipments and 40 minutes preparing the cord shipments?
­
Check the highlighted parts. That should help.­
User avatar
Silvio1998
Joined: 19 Apr 2025
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 110
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MBAApplicant2026
Am I missing something here? Given that the average time spent on lightbulb shipments was 20% greater than the average time spent on cord shipments and a total of 90 minutes was spent preparing all the shipments, why can't we conclude that she spent 50 minutes preparing the bulb shipments and 40 minutes preparing the cord shipments?

The average time per lightbulb spent is 20% greater. Stat1.

Stat2. The total time spent is 90 minutes.

L = # number of lightbulbs (quantity)
E = # number of eletric (quantity)
x = average time spend per lightbulb
y = average time spend per electric
Z = weighted average

Question asks: LX =?

Formula weighted average = L.X + E.Y / L + E = Z

1) X = 6/5 Y Or Y = 5X/6
2) LX + EY = 90

Answering your question
Why can't you assume it is 40 and 50 minutes?
Because you can not assume that L = E.

If L = E, then we have LX + LY = 90
Y = 5X/6
LX + L(5X/6) = 90
(solve algebraically this equation normally.. multiply by 6 everything)
6LX + 5LX = 540
LX = 540/11 = 49 1/11 minutes.. therefore we have an answer, together would be C..

However.. what if L is DIFFERENT than E?
If L = 10 and E = 20, then we have

LX + EY = 90
Y = 5X/6
L(X) + 20(5X/6) = 90
(solve algebraically this equation normally.. multiply by 6 everything)
6LX + 100X = 540
X ( 6L + 100 ) = 540
we assumed L = 10, lets substitute
X (160) = 540
X = 540/160 = 27/8

We want to answer the question LX =?
X = 27/8
L = 10
270/8 = 135/4 is different from 540/11 that we found when L=E.. Since we have this options and many others if we assume different values for L and E..
Statements together are not sufficient (E)

Think about the numbers of lightbulbs and the numbers of electric..
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,433
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,433
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Looking at this Data Sufficiency question, you're dealing with a classic trap that many students fall into - thinking that having a relationship between averages and a total sum is enough information. Let me walk you through why this isn't the case.

Understanding What We Need

The question asks for a specific number: how many minutes did Wanda spend on lightbulb shipments? This is a value question, so we need to find an exact amount of time.

Analyzing Statement 1

Statement 1 tells us that the average time per lightbulb shipment was 20% greater than the average time per electrical cord shipment.

Let's think about this: if a cord shipment takes \(t\) minutes on average, then a lightbulb shipment takes \(1.2t\) minutes. But here's what you need to see - we don't know how many of each type she prepared!

If she prepared many lightbulb shipments and few cord shipments, most of her time went to lightbulbs. But if she prepared few lightbulb shipments and many cord shipments, the opposite is true. Without knowing the counts or the total time, we can't determine the answer.

Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.

Analyzing Statement 2

Statement 2 gives us the total time: 90 minutes for all shipments combined.
Notice how this still doesn't help us - the 90 minutes could be split in countless ways:

Could be 45 minutes on each type
Could be 80 minutes on lightbulbs, 10 on cords
Could be 10 minutes on lightbulbs, 80 on cords

Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.

Combining Both Statements
Here's where it gets interesting. With both statements, you might think we have enough - we know the relationship between the averages AND the total time. But we're still missing a crucial piece: the number of shipments of each type.
Let me show you with a quick example:

If Wanda prepared 9 lightbulb shipments and 1 cord shipment, with the 20% relationship and 90-minute total, the time on lightbulbs would be about 82 minutes
If she prepared 1 lightbulb shipment and 9 cord shipments, with the same constraints, the time on lightbulbs would be about 11 minutes

These are vastly different answers! Without knowing the shipment counts, we can't determine a unique value.

Answer: E - Both statements together are insufficient.

Want to master this type of question systematically? You can check out the step-by-step solution on Neuron by e-GMAT which reveals the algebraic framework for handling these "missing count" problems and shows you how to quickly identify when shipment/item counts are the missing piece. You can also explore other GMAT official questions with detailed solutions on Neuron for structured practice here.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109765 posts
498 posts
212 posts