Looking at this Data Sufficiency question, you're dealing with a classic trap that many students fall into - thinking that having a relationship between averages and a total sum is enough information. Let me walk you through why this isn't the case.
Understanding What We NeedThe question asks for a specific number: how many minutes did Wanda spend on lightbulb shipments? This is a value question, so we need to find an exact amount of time.
Analyzing Statement 1Statement 1 tells us that the average time per lightbulb shipment was 20% greater than the average time per electrical cord shipment.
Let's think about this: if a cord shipment takes \(t\) minutes on average, then a lightbulb shipment takes \(1.2t\) minutes. But here's what you need to see - we don't know how many of each type she prepared!
If she prepared many lightbulb shipments and few cord shipments, most of her time went to lightbulbs. But if she prepared few lightbulb shipments and many cord shipments, the opposite is true. Without knowing the counts or the total time, we can't determine the answer.
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.Analyzing Statement 2Statement 2 gives us the total time: 90 minutes for all shipments combined.
Notice how this still doesn't help us - the 90 minutes could be split in countless ways:
Could be 45 minutes on each type
Could be 80 minutes on lightbulbs, 10 on cords
Could be 10 minutes on lightbulbs, 80 on cords
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.Combining Both StatementsHere's where it gets interesting. With both statements, you might think we have enough - we know the relationship between the averages AND the total time. But we're still missing a crucial piece: the number of shipments of each type.
Let me show you with a quick example:
If Wanda prepared 9 lightbulb shipments and 1 cord shipment, with the 20% relationship and 90-minute total, the time on lightbulbs would be about 82 minutes
If she prepared 1 lightbulb shipment and 9 cord shipments, with the same constraints, the time on lightbulbs would be about 11 minutes
These are vastly different answers! Without knowing the shipment counts, we can't determine a unique value.
Answer: E - Both statements together are insufficient.
Want to master this type of question systematically? You can check out the
step-by-step solution on Neuron by e-GMAT which reveals the algebraic framework for handling these "missing count" problems and shows you how to quickly identify when shipment/item counts are the missing piece. You can also explore other GMAT official questions with detailed solutions on Neuron for structured practice
here.