jamiedimonn
The inequality can hold true when x and y have opposite positive negative signs or when x and y have the same positive negative sign and |x| < |y|.Hence, in one case x*y will be less than zero and in the other case x*y will be greater than zero. The statement is not sufficient to answer the question.The 2nd statement holds good only when x and y have opposite signs when both x and y have same sign the statement fails ans should be D.Bunuel could you confirm?gmatophobia
Bunuel
Is xy < 0?
(1) |x + y| < |x| + |y|
(2) |x| - |y| < |x – y|
This question is based on a property
- |x + y| < |x| + |y| → x and y have opposite positive or negative signs
- |x + y| = |x| + |y| → x and y have same the positive or negative signs
- |x| - |y| < |x – y| → x and y have opposite positive or negative signs or when x and y have the same positive or negative signs and |x| < |y|
- |x| - |y| = |x – y| → x and y have the same positive or negative signs and |x| \(\geq\) |y|
We can apply this concept to the below question -
Statement 1(1) |x + y| < |x| + |y|Using the property above, we can conclude that x and y have opposite positive - negative signs. Hence, we can conclude that x*y is less than zero.
The statement is sufficient and we can eliminate A, and D.
Statement 2(2) |x| - |y| < |x – y|The inequality can hold true when x and y have opposite positive negative signs or when x and y have the same positive negative sign and |x| < |y|.
Hence, in one case x*y will be less than zero and in the other case x*y will be greater than zero. The statement is not sufficient to answer the question.
Option A The answer is, and should be, A, as indicated in the original post under the spoiler.
|x + y| < |x| + |y| holds true only when x and y have opposite signs. You can test this by plugging in numbers. When x and y have the same sign (so when xy ≥ 0), |x + y| = |x| + |y|, and when they have opposite signs, |x + y| < |x| + |y|. Therefore, the first statement is sufficient to conclude that xy < 0.
|x| - |y| < |x – y|, however, can be true when x and y have the same sign (e.g., x = 1 and y = 2; x = -1 and y = -2) as well as when they have opposite signs (e.g., x = 1 and y = -1; x = -1 and y = 1). Thus, the second statement is not sufficient to conclude whether xy < 0.
P.S. Pure algebraic questions are no longer a part of the
DS syllabus of the GMAT.
DS questions in GMAT Focus encompass various types of word problems, such as:
- Word Problems
- Work Problems
- Distance Problems
- Mixture Problems
- Percent and Interest Problems
- Overlapping Sets Problems
- Statistics Problems
- Combination and Probability Problems
While these questions may involve or necessitate knowledge of algebra, arithmetic, inequalities, etc., they will always be presented in the form of word problems. You won’t encounter pure "algebra" questions like, "Is x > y?" or "A positive integer n has two prime factors..."
Check
GMAT Syllabus for Focus EditionYou can also visit the
Data Sufficiency forum and filter questions by
OG 2024-2025, GMAT Prep (Focus), and Data Insights Review 2024-2025 sources to see the types of questions currently tested on the GMAT.
So, you can ignore this and similar questions.Hope it helps.