Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 13:11 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 13:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rc197906
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Last visit: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
28
 [26]
Location: CT
Posts: 5
Kudos: 28
 [26]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
810,657
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
rakesh1239
Joined: 26 Dec 2003
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 119
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rc197906
Joined: 31 Jul 2003
Last visit: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Location: CT
Posts: 5
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the answer is D actually...anyone have any ideas on why D?
User avatar
stoolfi
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Last visit: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
370
 [2]
Location: 55405
Posts: 246
Kudos: 370
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rakesh explains why 1 is sufficient. Here's why 2 is sufficient:


The length of QS is 6.

Hence, QR and RS are each 3.

Call OR and PR BOTH "x".

(Since OR and PR combine to form a radius, just like OS)

Call OS "2x."

Since we have a right triangle, we can establish that X^2 +3^2=(2x)^2.

Solve this and you see that x= sqrt 3, and 2x (in this case line OS) is 2*sqrt3.

I think
User avatar
rakesh1239
Joined: 26 Dec 2003
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 119
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stoolfi ur explanation for statement (2) is good. I dont know why I miss out those things. Probably due to time constrains. Anyways from (1) we are given that PR= sqrt 3, we know that PR=OR (Bisects), so OP will be 2sqrt3 and as both OP and OS are radius, OP=OS. So OS= 2sqrt3
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,000
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. What is the length of OS?

1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\)
2) The length of QS is 6

Please provide detailed explanations!
Attachments

circle.jpg
circle.jpg [ 10.67 KiB | Viewed 11396 times ]

User avatar
kusena
Joined: 14 Aug 2013
Last visit: 30 Dec 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
167
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 10-31-2013
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Consumer Electronics)
Posts: 23
Kudos: 167
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. What is the length of OS?

1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\)
2) The length of QS is 6

Please provide detailed explanations!

In the given figure,OS=OP=radius "r"
and PR=RO=r/2
QR=RS,angleORS=90 degrees
We need find length of OS, which is radius of the circle

From stmt 1)PR= [square_root]3 and PR=r/2 hence radius=2*[square_root]3, hence 1 alone is sufficient
From stmt 2)QS=6 => RS=3 (OP is bisector of QS,R is the midpoint of QS)
OS=radius=r
and OR=r/2 (R is the midpoint of OP, OP being the radius of the circle)
r^2=(r/2)^2+3^2
r=2*[square_root]3
Hence stmt 2 alone is sufficient

Ans is D
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. What is the length of OS?

1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\)
2) The length of QS is 6

Please provide detailed explanations!

Merging similar topics.
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 03 Jan 2026
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 520
Kudos: 2,584
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rc197906
Attachment:
Untitled.png
In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other, what is the length of OS?

(1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\)
(2) The length of QS is 6

Hi,

St 1 is obvious so lets not dwell on that.

From St 2 we get QS =6 -----> QR=RS=3

Let OR=x since it is being bisected by QS then PR is also x
Also OQ= 2x since OP=OS as radius of circle
Now in triangle OQR we have 3^2+x^2= 4X^2

9=3 x^2
x=\sqrt{3}

Hence OQ= 2\sqrt{3}

Ans is D
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,000
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is there any property tested here? I'm really clueless when it comes to geometry...
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 573
Kudos: 7,000
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So for such questions never rely on the figure. In this particular question, the figure is misleading.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
810,657
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
So for such questions never rely on the figure. In this particular question, the figure is misleading.

Why it's misleading?

OG13, page 150:
Figures: A figure accompanying a problem solving question is intended to provide information useful in solving the problem. Figures are drawn as accurately as possible. Exceptions will be clearly noted. Lines shown as straight are straight, and lines that appear jagged are also straight. The positions of points, angles, regions, etc., exist in the order shown, and angle measures are greater than zero. All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

OG13, page 272:
A figure accompanying a data sufficiency problem will conform to the information given in the question but will not necessarily conform to the additional information given in statements (1) and (2).
Lines shown as straight can be assumed to be straight and lines that appear jagged can also be assumed to be straight.
You may assume that the positions of points, angles, regions, and so forth exist in the order shown and that angle measures are greater than zero degrees.
All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,302
Kudos: 2,975
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
fozzzy
So for such questions never rely on the figure. In this particular question, the figure is misleading.

Why it's misleading?

OG13, page 150:
Figures: A figure accompanying a problem solving question is intended to provide information useful in solving the problem. Figures are drawn as accurately as possible. Exceptions will be clearly noted. Lines shown as straight are straight, and lines that appear jagged are also straight. The positions of points, angles, regions, etc., exist in the order shown, and angle measures are greater than zero. All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

OG13, page 272:
A figure accompanying a data sufficiency problem will conform to the information given in the question but will not necessarily conform to the additional information given in statements (1) and (2).
Lines shown as straight can be assumed to be straight and lines that appear jagged can also be assumed to be straight.
You may assume that the positions of points, angles, regions, and so forth exist in the order shown and that angle measures are greater than zero degrees.
All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel, question for you
How do we know that PR = OR from the fact that the chord is perpendicular to the radius? I mean what's the property here if you will
Thanks
Cheers
J :)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jlgdr
Bunuel
fozzzy
So for such questions never rely on the figure. In this particular question, the figure is misleading.

Why it's misleading?

OG13, page 150:
Figures: A figure accompanying a problem solving question is intended to provide information useful in solving the problem. Figures are drawn as accurately as possible. Exceptions will be clearly noted. Lines shown as straight are straight, and lines that appear jagged are also straight. The positions of points, angles, regions, etc., exist in the order shown, and angle measures are greater than zero. All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

OG13, page 272:
A figure accompanying a data sufficiency problem will conform to the information given in the question but will not necessarily conform to the additional information given in statements (1) and (2).
Lines shown as straight can be assumed to be straight and lines that appear jagged can also be assumed to be straight.
You may assume that the positions of points, angles, regions, and so forth exist in the order shown and that angle measures are greater than zero degrees.
All figures lie in a plane unless otherwise indicated.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel, question for you
How do we know that PR = OR from the fact that the chord is perpendicular to the radius? I mean what's the property here if you will
Thanks
Cheers
J :)

We are told that OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other, which means that PR = OR and QR = RS.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From statement 2.) it seems like we know that triangle ORS is a 30:60:90. How do we know this?

I think I got it but I want to be sure:

We know OP = OS because they are both radiuses. QS bisects OP so OR (where R is the midpoint of OP) is equal to 1/2 OS. We can say that OS = 2x and OR = x. From statement 2 we know that QS = 6 and RS therefore must = 3 because it is bisected by OP. We can now set up Pythagorean equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2 --> x^2 + 3^2 = 2x^2 --> x^2 + 9 = 2x^2 --> Subtract x^2 from both sides --> x^2 = 9 --> x = 3. If x = 3, then 2x (i.e. line OS) = 6.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
fozzzy
Is there any property tested here? I'm really clueless when it comes to geometry...

In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. What is the length of OS?

Notice that OS is the radius of the circle.

(1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\). PR is half of the radius, so the radius is twice of that. Sufficient.

(2) The length of QS is 6. This one tests pythagorean theorem. Triangle ORS is a right triangle. We know that RS=QS/2=3 and we know that the other two sides are r (OS) and r/2 (OR) --> r^2=(r/2)^2+3^2 --> \(r=2\sqrt{3}\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope this helps.

Totally makes sense. The only issue is that I have taught myself to never assume certain things on DS. How can we be sure that PR is half the radius? What if OS bisects PO at some point other than half? Similarly, how can we be sure that PO bisects OS at exactly the half way point?

I am struggling here with understanding when we should and should not assume something.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
Bunuel
fozzzy
Is there any property tested here? I'm really clueless when it comes to geometry...

In the figure above, O is the center of the circle. If OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. What is the length of OS?

Notice that OS is the radius of the circle.

(1) The length of PR is \(\sqrt{3}\). PR is half of the radius, so the radius is twice of that. Sufficient.

(2) The length of QS is 6. This one tests pythagorean theorem. Triangle ORS is a right triangle. We know that RS=QS/2=3 and we know that the other two sides are r (OS) and r/2 (OR) --> r^2=(r/2)^2+3^2 --> \(r=2\sqrt{3}\). Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope this helps.

Totally makes sense. The only issue is that I have taught myself to never assume certain things on DS. How can we be sure that PR is half the radius? What if OS bisects PO at some point other than half? Similarly, how can we be sure that PO bisects OS at exactly the half way point?

I am struggling here with understanding when we should and should not assume something.

We are told that OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. In geometry bisect means divide into two exactly equal parts.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
CEdward


Totally makes sense. The only issue is that I have taught myself to never assume certain things on DS. How can we be sure that PR is half the radius? What if OS bisects PO at some point other than half? Similarly, how can we be sure that PO bisects OS at exactly the half way point?

I am struggling here with understanding when we should and should not assume something.

We are told that OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. In geometry bisect means divide into two exactly equal parts.

Bunuel, this is beyond helpful. Thank you. As a follow-up question, suppose a line seemingly 'bissects' one angle of a triangle in half. Can I assume that the two resulting angles are equal (particularly if there is no mention of 'bisect') or would that be a mistake?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,753
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,753
Kudos: 810,657
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
Bunuel
CEdward


Totally makes sense. The only issue is that I have taught myself to never assume certain things on DS. How can we be sure that PR is half the radius? What if OS bisects PO at some point other than half? Similarly, how can we be sure that PO bisects OS at exactly the half way point?

I am struggling here with understanding when we should and should not assume something.

We are told that OP and QS are perpendicular and bisect each other. In geometry bisect means divide into two exactly equal parts.

Bunuel, this is beyond helpful. Thank you. As a follow-up question, suppose a line seemingly 'bissects' one angle of a triangle in half. Can I assume that the two resulting angles are equal (particularly if there is no mention of 'bisect') or would that be a mistake?

No, you cannot assume that a line is the bisector if you are not told that.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109753 posts
498 posts
212 posts