Statement (1): The company’s current marketing strategy exploits its consumers’ fears to drive sales, resulting in increased profits.This statement tells us that the current strategy, which exploits fears, leads to increased profits. However, it does not provide information on what would happen if the strategy changes to focus on consumer well-being.
Thus, Statement (1) alone is not sufficient
Statement (2): From an ethical standpoint, the company should prioritize consumer well-being over short-term profits and refrain from exploiting their fears.This statement is more about ethics and does not directly address whether focusing on consumer well-being would lead to a loss of sales. It provides no information about the sales impact of changing the strategy.
Therefore, Statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
Combining the Statements:Even when combining both statements, we still do not have any concrete information about the actual sales impact of switching the strategy from exploiting fears to focusing on consumer well-being. The statements focus on current success and ethical considerations but do not give data on the potential sales outcome of the proposed change.
=> Both statements together are
not sufficient to answer the question.
Thus, the answer is
(E): The information in the two statements together is not sufficient to answer the question asked.