Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
20 Aug 2024, 01:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
34% (02:30) correct
66%
(02:22)
wrong
based on 108
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Yesterday, Tom had only racing cars and robots in toys. Out of the total number of toys that he had yesterday, 11/20 were racing cars. Today, his dad bought some new racing cars and robots for him. If he didn’t lose or break any toy from yesterday, is the fraction of the robots that he has today is less than yesterday?
(1) Less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots.
(2) Today, the number of total toys he has is 1/4 more than the total number of toys that he had yesterday.
(1) Less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots.
(2) Today, the number of total toys he has is 1/4 more than the total number of toys that he had yesterday.
20 Aug 2024, 03:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
If \(\frac{11}{20}\) were racing cars, then \(\frac{9}{20}\) were robots, or 45% were robots.
(1) Less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots.
Assume that in total there were 20 toys in total prior to the dad buying new toys.
The smallest possible whole number for the amount of new toys that the dad bought is 3. In this instance 2 were new cars and one was a robot. This makes the new ratio then: \(\frac{9}{23}\) - in which case the fraction of the robots did go down.
However, if the father bought 80 new toys, and say 39 were robots then the new fraction will be: \(\frac{48}{100}\) which is larger.
INSUFFICIENT
(2) Today, the number of total toys he has is 1/4 more than the total number of toys that he had yesterday.
Once again, going with the notion that there were 20 toys in total, then now there will be 25 toys in total.
If his dad bought him only a single robot then the new fraction is \(\frac{10}{25}\) which is lower than 45%.
However if 4 of the 5 toys were robots, then the new fraction for the robots is \(\frac{13}{25}\) which is 52%.
Without further information, one cannot deduce if the fraction increased or decreased.
INSUFFICIENT
(1+2)
Putting the two together, and once again using 20 as the original number of toys, one knows that 5 toys were bought. However, in this instance one needs to not view the robots as only being represented by whole numbers: The minimum possible whole number for the amount of new robots bought is 1 and the greatest is 2:
If one robot was bought the fraction is \(\frac{10}{25}\), or 40%.
If two robots were bought the fraction is \(\frac{11}{25}\), or 44%. Both of which are lower.
HOWEVER, say the father had bought 2.4 robots (which still fits the threshhold of 'less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots'), then the new fraction is \(\frac{11.4}{25}\), or 45.6%, which is greater than the original fraction of robots.
INSUFFICIENT
ANSWER E
(1) Less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots.
Assume that in total there were 20 toys in total prior to the dad buying new toys.
The smallest possible whole number for the amount of new toys that the dad bought is 3. In this instance 2 were new cars and one was a robot. This makes the new ratio then: \(\frac{9}{23}\) - in which case the fraction of the robots did go down.
However, if the father bought 80 new toys, and say 39 were robots then the new fraction will be: \(\frac{48}{100}\) which is larger.
INSUFFICIENT
(2) Today, the number of total toys he has is 1/4 more than the total number of toys that he had yesterday.
Once again, going with the notion that there were 20 toys in total, then now there will be 25 toys in total.
If his dad bought him only a single robot then the new fraction is \(\frac{10}{25}\) which is lower than 45%.
However if 4 of the 5 toys were robots, then the new fraction for the robots is \(\frac{13}{25}\) which is 52%.
Without further information, one cannot deduce if the fraction increased or decreased.
INSUFFICIENT
(1+2)
Putting the two together, and once again using 20 as the original number of toys, one knows that 5 toys were bought. However, in this instance one needs to not view the robots as only being represented by whole numbers: The minimum possible whole number for the amount of new robots bought is 1 and the greatest is 2:
If one robot was bought the fraction is \(\frac{10}{25}\), or 40%.
If two robots were bought the fraction is \(\frac{11}{25}\), or 44%. Both of which are lower.
HOWEVER, say the father had bought 2.4 robots (which still fits the threshhold of 'less than 1/2 of the new toys are robots'), then the new fraction is \(\frac{11.4}{25}\), or 45.6%, which is greater than the original fraction of robots.
INSUFFICIENT
ANSWER E
