Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 12:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 12:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
811,055
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,055
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rosyln
Joined: 04 Oct 2024
Last visit: 27 Nov 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 36
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Tammy01
Joined: 31 Oct 2024
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
10
 [3]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
Posts: 9
Kudos: 10
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EshaFatim
Joined: 21 Aug 2024
Last visit: 20 Jan 2025
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 464
Location: Canada
Posts: 78
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rosyln
B is the correct answer.

2. 70% of the kids who didn't buy a toy played basketball.
N - number of kids who didn't buy a toy. Thus, 0.7 * N represents the kids who didn't buy a toy and played basketball. Since, the total number of kids is 50, we have T+N=50. This statement gives us enough information to determine the percentage of total kids who played basketball because we can calculate N and apply the 70% to find the number of basketball players. Sufficient on its own.
We don't need to combine the statements, as statement 2 alone is sufficient to determine the answer.
Hi rosyln

How are you calculating N in the above-highlighted statement, please?
User avatar
rosyln
Joined: 04 Oct 2024
Last visit: 27 Nov 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 36
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi!

Since we're asked to find the % of total kids who played basketball, let's start by calculating how many of these 50 kids played basketball based on Statement 2.
1. According to Statement 2, 70% of kids who didn't buy a toy (N) played basketball. This means that the number of kids who played basketball is 0.7 * N;
2. Now, if we knew the exact value of N, we could calculate the number of kids who played basketball. However, without additional details about how many kids bought a toy (or equivalently, how many didn't), we cannot find N exactly. Thus, Statement 2 alone is sufficient to calculate the % of basketball players once N is known but does not directly provide N.

EshaFatim
rosyln
B is the correct answer.

2. 70% of the kids who didn't buy a toy played basketball.
N - number of kids who didn't buy a toy. Thus, 0.7 * N represents the kids who didn't buy a toy and played basketball. Since, the total number of kids is 50, we have T+N=50. This statement gives us enough information to determine the percentage of total kids who played basketball because we can calculate N and apply the 70% to find the number of basketball players. Sufficient on its own.
We don't need to combine the statements, as statement 2 alone is sufficient to determine the answer.
Hi rosyln

How are you calculating N in the above-highlighted statement, please?
User avatar
EshaFatim
Joined: 21 Aug 2024
Last visit: 20 Jan 2025
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 464
Location: Canada
Posts: 78
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rosyln
Hi!

Since we're asked to find the % of total kids who played basketball, let's start by calculating how many of these 50 kids played basketball based on Statement 2.
1. According to Statement 2, 70% of kids who didn't buy a toy (N) played basketball. This means that the number of kids who played basketball is 0.7 * N;
2. Now, if we knew the exact value of N, we could calculate the number of kids who played basketball. However, without additional details about how many kids bought a toy (or equivalently, how many didn't), we cannot find N exactly. Thus, Statement 2 alone is sufficient to calculate the % of basketball players once N is known but does not directly provide N.

EshaFatim
rosyln
B is the correct answer.

2. 70% of the kids who didn't buy a toy played basketball.
N - number of kids who didn't buy a toy. Thus, 0.7 * N represents the kids who didn't buy a toy and played basketball. Since, the total number of kids is 50, we have T+N=50. This statement gives us enough information to determine the percentage of total kids who played basketball because we can calculate N and apply the 70% to find the number of basketball players. Sufficient on its own.
We don't need to combine the statements, as statement 2 alone is sufficient to determine the answer.
Hi rosyln

How are you calculating N in the above-highlighted statement, please?

Oh, I see. But unfortunately, we can't reason it like that though. If you cannot answer any statement for lack of information, it simply means that statement alone is insufficient to answer.
User avatar
Carson31
Joined: 04 Oct 2024
Last visit: 30 Dec 2024
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 3
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tammy01
Total Kids: 50
Each bought either 1 toy or no toy. (Toy=x, No Toy= 50-x)
Each played either Football or Basketball. (Football = y, basketball = 50-y)


St1: 0.3x + (kids who didn't buy a toy but played football) = y (Alone not suff)
St2: 0.7(50-x) + (kids who bought a toy and played basketball) = 50-y (Alone not suff)

Combining both,
Football:
0.3x + 0.3(50-x) = y [Since 70% without toy played basketball, thus remaining 30% without toy played football]
0.7(50-x) + 0.7(x) = 50-y [Similar explanation as above]

Now we have 2 equations and 2 unknowns which is easily solvable. (Thus both together are suff)


Ans: C
I don't get it. After combining the 2 equations, 0.3x + 0.3(50-x) = y and 0.7(50-x) + 0.7(x) = 50-y, we get x + (50-x)=50 , we still are not able to find the exact figure of x.
User avatar
ubaid009
Joined: 15 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 7
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no of kids buy 1 toy = x, no of kids buy 0 toy= y
x+y=50
no of kids played bb + no of kids played fb = 50
Statement 1- kids who played fb = 0.3x +(we don't know about the kids who bought 0 toy and played fb)
insuff
Statement 2- kids who played bb= 0.7y + (we don't know about the kids who bought 1 toy and played bb)
Insuff
Both 1 & 2
kids played fb = 0.3x + 0.3y
kids played bb = 0.7x + 0.7y
these all values must be in integers choose x and y accordingly
x=10 y=10 , fb=3+3=6 , bb= 7+7=14, bb+fb ≠ 50 --- wrong
x=20 y=30 , fb = 6+9 = 15, bb= 14+21= 35, bb + fb =50 ---right
x=30 y= 20 same result
by both we can get % of kids played bb i.e bb=35/50*100= 70 %
User avatar
lisahoang1301
Joined: 16 Jun 2024
Last visit: 05 Apr 2026
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Focus 1: 565 Q83 V81 DI70
GPA: 3.73
GMAT Focus 1: 565 Q83 V81 DI70
Posts: 48
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
There are 50 kids in a locality. On Sunday all of them went together to buy toys from a kids’ store and then to play at the park. At kid’s store each one of them bought at most 1 toy and at the park they played either football or basketball but not both. If each of them played at least 1 game, then what percentage of total kids played basketball at the park?

(1) 30% of the kids who bought a toy, played football.

(2) 70% of the kids who didn’t buy a toy, played basketball.


­
We want the percent who played basketball = B/50.
Let T = number who bought a toy, so 50−T didn't. Every kid played exactly one game (football or basketball).
[hr]
(1) “30% of the kids who bought a toy played football.”
Among the T buyers, football = 0.30T ⇒ basketball among buyers = 0.70T.
But we have no information about how the 50−T non-buyers split between football and basketball. So the total basketball players could vary depending on that unknown split.
(1) alone is not sufficient.
[hr]
(2) “70% of the kids who didn’t buy a toy played basketball.”
Among non-buyers (50−T), basketball = 0.70(50−T).
But we still don’t know the split among the TTT buyers. So (2) alone is not sufficient.
[hr]
(1) and (2) together.
Basketball total
B=(basketball among buyers)+(basketball among non-buyers)=0.70T+0.70(50−T)
Factor 0.70:
B=0.70(T+(50−T))=0.70×50=35
So 35 of the 50 kids played basketball ⇒ percentage = 35/50=0.70=70%
Both statements together determine the answer; neither alone does.
[hr]
Answer: C — Both statements together are sufficient, each alone is not.
User avatar
haianh
Joined: 29 Oct 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 45
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Summary:
  • Every kid played either football or basketball, no overlap.
  • Every kid bought either 0 or 1 toy.
  • X = kids who bought a toy
  • Y = kids who did not buy a toy
  • Total: X + Y = 50.
  • Ask for: basketball / 50?

buy toynot buy toy(1)+(2)
football0.3X (1)
basketball 0.7X0.7Y (2)0.7(X+Y)
XY50
(1): given by statement (1). This alone is not sufficient.
(2): given by statement (2). This alone is not sufficient.

From (1) and (2) \(\to\) basketball = 0.7(X+Y) = 0.7*50 = 35. Sufficient.
Answer: C
Moderators:
Math Expert
109818 posts
498 posts
212 posts