The key concept being tested here is expressing multiple unknowns as a single variable before evaluating the statements — the classic DS move for "find the total" questions with linked quantities.
Step 1: Set up variables and use the stem's relationships.
Let G = grade schoolers, M = middle schoolers, H = high schoolers.
The stem tells us: H = 2G and H = M + 50, so M = 2G − 50.
Total = G + M + H = G + (2G − 50) + 2G = 5G − 50
The entire question now reduces to: can we determine G? This is the unlock — once you see this, both statements become straightforward to evaluate.
Step 2: Evaluate Statement 1 — "G + M = 130"
Substitute M = 2G − 50:
G + (2G − 50) = 130 → 3G = 180 → G = 60
Total = 5(60) − 50 = 250 students. → Sufficient.
Step 3: Evaluate Statement 2 — "Probability of selecting a high schooler = 12/25"
This means H / Total = 12/25 → 2G / (5G − 50) = 12/25
Cross-multiply: 50G = 60G − 600 → 10G = 600 → G = 60
Total = 250 students. → Sufficient.
Answer: D
Common trap: Most students who miss this either try to work with three separate unknowns without reducing to one, which makes both statements look insufficient, or they evaluate Statement 2 by plugging in numbers until something works — that approach eats up time and often leads to errors. The moment you collapse the total to 5G − 50, both statements hand you the answer cleanly.
Takeaway: In DS questions where the stem links multiple unknowns together, always reduce to a single variable first — it tells you exactly what information each statement needs to deliver.
(Kavya | 725 on GMAT Focus Edition)