Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:01 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,770
Own Kudos:
810,727
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,770
Kudos: 810,727
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,770
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,770
Kudos: 810,727
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Adit_
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 691
Own Kudos:
225
 [1]
Given Kudos: 116
Posts: 691
Kudos: 225
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Blindspot108
Joined: 10 Dec 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Products:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Case 1: insufficient
Case 2: lets say the no of dog in harbor is d, maximum cat in harbor can be d-1, total 2d-1.
no of cats in cedar is 2d+2, minimum dog is lets say 0, still 2d+2>2d-1, so its cedar with higher no of animals
User avatar
Edskore
Joined: 29 Dec 2022
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
128
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 273
Kudos: 128
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good variable setup is what makes this clean. Let me walk through it.

Let:
c1 = cats in Cedar, d1 = dogs in Cedar
c2 = cats in Harbor, d2 = dogs in Harbor

We're told c1 > d1 (Cedar: more cats) and d2 > c2 (Harbor: more dogs). Question: is c1 + d1 > c2 + d2?

1. Statement (1): c2 = 2d1 + 2.
This tells us Harbor's cat count in terms of Cedar's dog count. But c1, d2 are free to be anything.
Try d1=1, c1=2 (Cedar total=3), c2=4, d2=5 (Harbor total=9). Cedar < Harbor.
Try d1=10, c1=100 (Cedar total=110), c2=22, d2=23 (Harbor total=45). Cedar > Harbor.
Two opposite answers — Statement 1 alone is not sufficient.

2. Statement (2): c1 = 2d2 + 2.
Cedar's cat count is pinned to Harbor's dog count. Now something interesting happens.

Cedar total = c1 + d1 = (2d2 + 2) + d1.
Since both shelters house cats AND dogs, d1 >= 1.
So Cedar total >= 2d2 + 3.

Harbor total = c2 + d2. Since d2 > c2, we know c2 <= d2 - 1.
So Harbor total <= (d2 - 1) + d2 = 2d2 - 1.

Cedar total >= 2d2 + 3 and Harbor total <= 2d2 - 1.
Cedar always has more animals. The answer to the question is always YES. Statement 2 alone is sufficient.

Answer: B.

The trap here is that Statement 1 feels like it's giving a useful relationship, so many people rush to "C." But Statement 1 connects Harbor's cats to Cedar's dogs while leaving Cedar's total completely free to swing either way. Statement 2 directly links Cedar's largest category (cats, since c1 > d1) to Harbor's largest category (dogs, since d2 > c2), and that constraint is tight enough to lock in the comparison.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109766 posts
498 posts
212 posts