Answer: (E)
This is a Data Sufficiency ratio problem, and the key insight is that the question asks for a specific ratio (N/S), not just whether the two locations are related.
Let r = the common ratio of memberships to guest passes at both locations.
Let N = guest passes issued by North, S = guest passes issued by South.
Then memberships at North = rN, memberships at South = rS.
S1 alone: S - N = 720. We just know the difference. N/S could be 100:820, or 200:920, or infinitely many other values. Insufficient.
S2 alone: rS - rN = 90, meaning r(S - N) = 90. We know the product of r and (S - N), but neither value individually. For example, r = 1/8 with S - N = 720 works, but so does r = 1/10 with S - N = 900. Without knowing S - N, we can't find N/S. Insufficient.
Together: From S2, r * (S - N) = 90. From S1, S - N = 720. So r = 90/720 = 1/8. Good, we know the ratio. But does knowing r help us find N/S? No — r is the membership-to-guest-pass ratio, not the North-to-South ratio. We still only know S - N = 720, which is one equation with two unknowns N and S.
N = 100, S = 820 → N/S = 100/820
N = 200, S = 920 → N/S = 200/920
Both satisfy all conditions with r = 1/8. So N/S is not determined.
The trap is thinking that knowing r uniquely determines the ratio of the locations. It doesn't. We'd need an absolute value (like the total guest passes, or individual numbers) to pin down N/S.