Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 22:34 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 22:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hussain15
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Last visit: 07 Jul 2021
Posts: 1,075
Own Kudos:
3,539
 [9]
Given Kudos: 157
Status:The last round
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 1,075
Kudos: 3,539
 [9]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
810,890
 [7]
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
madeinafrica
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2012
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
76
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Affiliations: ?
Location: Africa/Europe
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance, Strategy
Schools:Kellogg; Ross ($$); Tuck
Posts: 131
Kudos: 76
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Hussain15
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Last visit: 07 Jul 2021
Posts: 1,075
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 157
Status:The last round
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 1,075
Kudos: 3,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is "A".

My query::

|6 - 3x| = x - 2

As a module is always positive, hence we can say that x-2>0
If x-2>0 then it implies x>2. But our answer is showing that x=2

What am I missing here??
User avatar
gurpreetsingh
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 2,266
Own Kudos:
3,962
 [2]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 2,266
Kudos: 3,962
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
madeinafrica
(1) |6-3x| = x-2 <=> 6-3x = x-2 or 6-3x = -(x-2)

solving these equations you will have x=2 or x = 2 then (1) is sufficient. X = 2

(2) 5x+3 = 2x+9 or 5x+3 = -(2x+9)

3x = 6 or 7x = -12 we will have two values for x. (2) is not sufficient

Would pick (A)

I agree A is right. But do not neglect 2nd statement just because it gave 2 answers.

5x+3 = -(2x+ 9) only when 5x+3 <0
so the answer obtained 7x=-12 must satisfy this domain. In this case it is satisfying thus making it insufficient.

Imagine a case when the 2nd solution does not satisfy the domain, in that case it will be sufficient. So do not neglect the statement just because it gave two answers.
User avatar
Hussain15
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Last visit: 07 Jul 2021
Posts: 1,075
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 157
Status:The last round
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 1,075
Kudos: 3,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Bunuel!! +1
User avatar
sag
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Last visit: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 103
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
very nicely explained Bunuel... +1.. thanks
avatar
gchawla123
Joined: 20 Apr 2013
Last visit: 13 May 2016
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 12
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Hussain15
OA is "A".

My query::

|6 - 3x| = x - 2

As a module is always positive, hence we can say that x-2>0
If x-2>0 then it implies x>2. But our answer is showing that x=2

What am I missing here??

Red part is not correct: absolute value is never negative (absolute value \(\geq{0}\)).

Step-by-step solution:

(1) \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\) --> as LHS (left hand side) is absolute value, which is never negative (absolute value \(\geq{0}\)), RHS also must be \(\geq{0}\) --> \(x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{2}\). For \(x\geq{2}\), \(|6 - 3x|=-6+3x\), so \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\) becomes \(-6+3x=x-2\) --> \(x=2\). Sufficient.


(2) \(|5x + 3| = 2x + 9\). (note that by the same logic as above \(x\geq-\frac{9}{2}=-4.5\)) One check point \(x=-\frac{3}{5}\) (check point(s) the value of x when absolute value equals to zero).

\(x\leq{-\frac{3}{5}}\) --> \(-5x-3=2x+9\) --> \(x=-\frac{12}{7}\) - valid solution as \(-\frac{9}{2}<-\frac{12}{7}<-\frac{3}{5}\);

\(x>{-\frac{3}{5}}\) --> \(5x+3=2x+9\) --> \(x=2\) - valid solution as \(-\frac{9}{2}<-\frac{3}{5}<2\);


Two valid solutions. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it helps.


I am not satisfied with the solution.

How do we solve modulus, we take two cases,
1)if (6-3x)>0 then given equation comes out to be 6-3x=x-2 which gives x=2 ,but we are considering the case when 6-3x>0 or x<2, hence this soln x=2 is not possible.

2) When we consider (6-3x)<0 then equation comes out to be -6+3x= x-2 which again gives x=2 , but this time we are considering 6-3x<0 or x>2, hence this soln x=2 is not feasible in this case also.

So according to me answer is E.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gchawla123
Bunuel
Hussain15
OA is "A".

My query::

|6 - 3x| = x - 2

As a module is always positive, hence we can say that x-2>0
If x-2>0 then it implies x>2. But our answer is showing that x=2

What am I missing here??

Red part is not correct: absolute value is never negative (absolute value \(\geq{0}\)).

Step-by-step solution:

(1) \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\) --> as LHS (left hand side) is absolute value, which is never negative (absolute value \(\geq{0}\)), RHS also must be \(\geq{0}\) --> \(x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{2}\). For \(x\geq{2}\), \(|6 - 3x|=-6+3x\), so \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\) becomes \(-6+3x=x-2\) --> \(x=2\). Sufficient.


(2) \(|5x + 3| = 2x + 9\). (note that by the same logic as above \(x\geq-\frac{9}{2}=-4.5\)) One check point \(x=-\frac{3}{5}\) (check point(s) the value of x when absolute value equals to zero).

\(x\leq{-\frac{3}{5}}\) --> \(-5x-3=2x+9\) --> \(x=-\frac{12}{7}\) - valid solution as \(-\frac{9}{2}<-\frac{12}{7}<-\frac{3}{5}\);

\(x>{-\frac{3}{5}}\) --> \(5x+3=2x+9\) --> \(x=2\) - valid solution as \(-\frac{9}{2}<-\frac{3}{5}<2\);


Two valid solutions. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it helps.


I am not satisfied with the solution.

How do we solve modulus, we take two cases,
1)if (6-3x)>0 then given equation comes out to be 6-3x=x-2 which gives x=2 ,but we are considering the case when 6-3x>0 or x<2, hence this soln x=2 is not possible.

2) When we consider (6-3x)<0 then equation comes out to be -6+3x= x-2 which again gives x=2 , but this time we are considering 6-3x<0 or x>2, hence this soln x=2 is not feasible in this case also.

So according to me answer is E.

Note that OA for this questio is A, not E.

Next, to check whether x=2 is a root of |6 - 3x| = x - 2 just substitute x=2 into it: |6 - 3*2| = 0 = 2 - 2.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
atalpanditgmat
Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Last visit: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Working hard to score better on GMAT
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.83
WE:Accounting (Consulting)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 711
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hussain15
What is the value of x?

(1) |6 - 3x| = x - 2

(2) |5x + 3| = 2x + 9

Hi Bunuel, cann't it be solved by the following approach?

Statement 1:
6-3x=x-2
X=2
Again,
-(6-3x)=x-2
ie -6+3x=x-2
X= 2

Similar solution from in both scenario. Hence sufficient.

Statement 2:

Similar process and we will get x= 12/7 and 2. Two different solutions. hence Insufficient.

Ans: A

Atal Pandit
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
atalpanditgmat
Hussain15
What is the value of x?

(1) |6 - 3x| = x - 2

(2) |5x + 3| = 2x + 9

Hi Bunuel, cann't it be solved by the following approach?

Statement 1:
6-3x=x-2
X=2
Again,
-(6-3x)=x-2
ie -6+3x=x-2
X= 2

Similar solution from in both scenario. Hence sufficient.

Statement 2:

Similar process and we will get x= 12/7 and 2. Two different solutions. hence Insufficient.

Ans: A

Atal Pandit

Yes, we can do this way too.

Typo: |5x + 3| = 2x + 9 --> x=-12/7 or x=2.
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It seems that I have solved some abs. value problems by finding what makes the equation in the abs. value sign = to zero, so for #2, why do we find what makes the equation outside the abs. value sign = to zero? In other words...

|5x + 3| = 2x + 9. ==> When x=-4.5 2x+9 = 2(-4.5)+9 = -9+9 = 0.

Thanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WholeLottaLove
It seems that I have solved some abs. value problems by finding what makes the equation in the abs. value sign = to zero, so for #2, why do we find what makes the equation outside the abs. value sign = to zero? In other words...

|5x + 3| = 2x + 9. ==> When x=-4.5 2x+9 = 2(-4.5)+9 = -9+9 = 0.

Thanks!

We can say that \(x\geq{-4.5}\) by the same logic as we concluded that \(x\geq{2}\) in (1).
avatar
Yahtzeefish
Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Last visit: 12 Jun 2013
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How did you get "for X> or = 2, |6x-3| = -6x+3" ?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
810,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yahtzeefish
How did you get "for X> or = 2, |6x-3| = -6x+3" ?

We have \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\). The left hand side (|6 - 3x|) is an absolute value. The absolute value is always more than or equal to 0, thus the right hand side (x - 2) must also be \(\geq{0}\) --> \(x-2\geq{0}\) --> \(x\geq{2}\). When \(x\geq{2}\), \(6 - 3x\leq{0}\), thus \(|6 - 3x|=-(6-3x)=-6+3x\), so \(|6 - 3x| = x - 2\) becomes \(-6+3x=x-2\) --> \(x=2\). Sufficient.

Similar questions to practice:
is-x-0-1-x-3-4x-3-2-x-3-2x-127978.html
what-is-x-1-x-2-2-x-3x-126874.html
what-is-the-value-of-y-127976.html

Hope it helps.
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 03 Jan 2026
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 520
Kudos: 2,584
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
atalpanditgmat
Hussain15
What is the value of x?

(1) |6 - 3x| = x - 2

(2) |5x + 3| = 2x + 9

Hi Bunuel, can't it be solved by the following approach?

Statement 1:
6-3x=x-2
X=2
Again,
-(6-3x)=x-2
ie -6+3x=x-2
X= 2

Similar solution from in both scenario. Hence sufficient.

Statement 2:

Similar process and we will get x= 12/7 and 2. Two different solutions. hence Insufficient.

Ans: A

Atal Pandit

Yes, we can do this way too.

Typo: |5x + 3| = 2x + 9 --> x=-12/7 or x=2.


Hello Bunuel,

I followed the same approach but looking at solution given by you, It is actually not required . I have seen some question types where in we just check for one condition (X>/0 or X<0) and we can conclude the answer (Like you just did in this one)

Are there particular question type where in your approach to this question will work. For ex
| Some expression in x| = x- some no.

Again since LHS >/0, we can say x-some no >/ -----> x>/ some no.

This can be helpful in saving time by avoiding checking expression for 2 possible case of x (<0,>0)

Thanks
Mridul
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,867
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mridulparashar1
Bunuel
atalpanditgmat

Yes, we can do this way too.

Typo: |5x + 3| = 2x + 9 --> x=-12/7 or x=2.


Hello Bunuel,

I followed the same approach but looking at solution given by you, It is actually not required . I have seen some question types where in we just check for one condition (X>/0 or X<0) and we can conclude the answer (Like you just did in this one)

Are there particular question type where in your approach to this question will work. For ex
| Some expression in x| = x- some no.

Again since LHS >/0, we can say x-some no >/ -----> x>/ some no.

This can be helpful in saving time by avoiding checking expression for 2 possible case of x (<0,>0)

Thanks
Mridul

Yes, in such kind of questions this approach might be helpful.
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just wanted to make sure the way I solved this problem is correct:

What is the value of x?

1. |6-3x|=x-2
2. |5x+3|=2x+9

1. 6-3x is positive when x<2. For example, if x=1 then 6-3x = 6-3(1) = 3. 6-3x is negative when x>2. For example, if x=3 then 6-3(x) = 6-3(3) = -3.

For positive cases: 6-3x=x-2 ==> x=2
For negative cases: -6+3x=x-2 ==> x=2

My issue here is that for the positive case x must be less than 2 and for the negative case x must be greater than 2 but for both cases here, I got x =2. The answer is sufficient, but I thought that for the cases to be sufficient the results had to be in line with what x= (for example, for the positive case here, x=2 but before I found that X must be LESS than 2 for 6-3x to be positive)

Could someone explain? I see why #2 fails (because for the positive case, 2 is greater than -3/5 but for the negative case, -7/12 is NOT greater than -3/5 but I am a bit lost with #1)

Thanks!
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 842
Own Kudos:
5,187
 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 842
Kudos: 5,187
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WholeLottaLove
I just wanted to make sure the way I solved this problem is correct:

What is the value of x?

1. |6-3x|=x-2
2. |5x+3|=2x+9

1. 6-3x is positive when x<2. For example, if x=1 then 6-3x = 6-3(1) = 3. 6-3x is negative when x>2. For example, if x=3 then 6-3(x) = 6-3(3) = -3.

For positive cases: 6-3x=x-2 ==> x=2
For negative cases: -6+3x=x-2 ==> x=2

My issue here is that for the positive case x must be less than 2 and for the negative case x must be greater than 2 but for both cases here, I got x =2. The answer is sufficient, but I thought that for the cases to be sufficient the results had to be in line with what x= (for example, for the positive case here, x=2 but before I found that X must be LESS than 2 for 6-3x to be positive)

Could someone explain? I see why #2 fails (because for the positive case, 2 is greater than -3/5 but for the negative case, -7/12 is NOT greater than -3/5 but I am a bit lost with #1)

Thanks!

You have a point here.

When you study a function, an abs value, you correctly define where is positive or negative
\(x>a\) positve for example
\(x<a\) negative for example
As you see the value \(a\) is not contained in neither interval... How do we solve this?
Just put an \(=\) sign under one of the above inequalities, so \(x\geq{}a\) and \(x<a\) - or \(x>a\) and \(x\leq{}a\).
Where you put the sign, it doesn not matter, the result will not change.

So just rewrite your equation into

For positive cases (\(x\leq{2}\)): 6-3x=x-2 ==> x=2 VALID
For negative cases (\(x>2\)): -6+3x=x-2 ==> x=2

and you have the result! Nothing changes, everything you did is absolutely correct, just put an \(=\) sign in one of the intervals
Hope it's clear
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok...I see that. But isn't the whole point to test cases where 6-3x is positive and negative? if X=2 then 6-3x is neither positive or negative, it's just zero.
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109795 posts
498 posts
212 posts