Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 May 2023, 08:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
“In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito, the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased. Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. Clearly, the residents of San Perdito would be best served if they voted Montoya out of office and reelected Varro.”
Essay:
The argument claims that the residents of San Perdito should reelect Varro as mayor and vore Montoya out of the office. The conclusion of the argument is based upon the comparison of unemployment anod populatin data of the city during the tenure of Varro and Montoyo as mayor. The conclusion of the argument relies on the assumption for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument assumes that the mere comparison of unemployment and population trends during the tenure of both the leaders is sufficent enough to take such a decision. However, the argument has not taken into consideration the other such important factors as health, education etc that could play vital role in overall welfare of the citizens. Without taking such factors into consideration such a decision can't be taken.
Second, the argument states that unemployment rate of the city has increased during the tenure of Montoya. However, a person who is unempolyed is the one who is willing to do the job but can't get a job. It is very much likely that during the tenure of Montoya, the employment opportunities available were either same or maybe more as they were during the tenure of Varro but the number of the person who were willing to work during the tenure of Montoya were more. In such a case the conclusion of the argument will fall apart.
Finally, the argument has compared the population data during the tenure of Montoya and Varro. However, it is very likely that the population of the city during the tenure of Varro had reached a threshold and the available city resources were not sufficent to provide for the citizens of the San Perdito. In such a situtation, the decrease in the population that happened during the tenure of Monoya is justified. So based upon the population data, we can't conclude that the citizens should vote Montoya out of the city and reelect Varro.
In Conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is thus unconvincing. Based upon the premises, we cannot conclude that it's in the favour of the citizens of the San Perdito to reelect Varro and vote Montoya out of the office. Without any further knowledge and data, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open for debate.
Essay:
The argument claims that the residents of San Perdito should reelect Varro as mayor and vore Montoya out of the office. The conclusion of the argument is based upon the comparison of unemployment anod populatin data of the city during the tenure of Varro and Montoyo as mayor. The conclusion of the argument relies on the assumption for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument assumes that the mere comparison of unemployment and population trends during the tenure of both the leaders is sufficent enough to take such a decision. However, the argument has not taken into consideration the other such important factors as health, education etc that could play vital role in overall welfare of the citizens. Without taking such factors into consideration such a decision can't be taken.
Second, the argument states that unemployment rate of the city has increased during the tenure of Montoya. However, a person who is unempolyed is the one who is willing to do the job but can't get a job. It is very much likely that during the tenure of Montoya, the employment opportunities available were either same or maybe more as they were during the tenure of Varro but the number of the person who were willing to work during the tenure of Montoya were more. In such a case the conclusion of the argument will fall apart.
Finally, the argument has compared the population data during the tenure of Montoya and Varro. However, it is very likely that the population of the city during the tenure of Varro had reached a threshold and the available city resources were not sufficent to provide for the citizens of the San Perdito. In such a situtation, the decrease in the population that happened during the tenure of Monoya is justified. So based upon the population data, we can't conclude that the citizens should vote Montoya out of the city and reelect Varro.
In Conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is thus unconvincing. Based upon the premises, we cannot conclude that it's in the favour of the citizens of the San Perdito to reelect Varro and vote Montoya out of the office. Without any further knowledge and data, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open for debate.
07 May 2023, 01:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 6 out of 6 !
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay presents a well-organized and coherent argument with clear topic sentences and smooth transitions between paragraphs.
Word structure: 6/6
The essay uses appropriate vocabulary and sentence structure to convey the ideas effectively.
Paragraph structure and formation: 6/6
The essay has well-structured paragraphs that follow a clear topic sentence and develop the argument in a logical and coherent way.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay has a good command of language and grammar, with no major errors that affect the meaning or clarity of the argument.
Vocabulary and word expression: 6/6
The essay uses a varied and appropriate vocabulary with clear and effective expression of ideas.
Overall, the essay is well-written with a clear structure, logical argument, and effective use of language and grammar. The essay is convincing and effectively analyzes the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. The essay could be improved by providing more concrete evidence and counterexamples to strengthen the argument further.
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay presents a well-organized and coherent argument with clear topic sentences and smooth transitions between paragraphs.
Word structure: 6/6
The essay uses appropriate vocabulary and sentence structure to convey the ideas effectively.
Paragraph structure and formation: 6/6
The essay has well-structured paragraphs that follow a clear topic sentence and develop the argument in a logical and coherent way.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay has a good command of language and grammar, with no major errors that affect the meaning or clarity of the argument.
Vocabulary and word expression: 6/6
The essay uses a varied and appropriate vocabulary with clear and effective expression of ideas.
Overall, the essay is well-written with a clear structure, logical argument, and effective use of language and grammar. The essay is convincing and effectively analyzes the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. The essay could be improved by providing more concrete evidence and counterexamples to strengthen the argument further.
jim441
04 Jan 2024, 17:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hey Sajjad1994 can you please help review my essay. Thanks!
____
The argument in the local newspaper claims that residents of San Perdito would be best served if they impeached Montoya and reelected Varra as mayor because in Montoya’s tenure as mayor the city experienced a decline in population, an increase in unemployment rates, and the closing of businesses, but conversely experienced an increase in population and a decrease unemployment rate in Varro’s time. However, the argument is flawed because it jumps to the conclusion that Varro was responsible for the prosperity of the city while Montoya was responsible for its deterioration. Furthermore, the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence making its conclusion weak and unconvincing.
First, the argument fails to discuss or consider the magnitude of the increase or decrease in population and unemployment rates. Perhaps, in Varro’s time the population increased and unemployment rates decreased by insignificant amounts, and it could also be the case that that population decreased and unemployment rates increased by insignificant amounts in Montoya’s time. If these two situations prove to be true, the change in the metrics in question cannot be used to further the case for Varro over Montoya.
Second, the argument assumes that prosperity of the city in Varro’s time and its downturn in Montoya’s can be attributed solely to the leadership of either mayor failing to consider other factors that could be responsible for the phenomena that occurred in mayors’ periods of leadership. For instance, Montoya could have taken the reigns from Varro at the time a serious pandemic that claimed numerous lives, putt people out of work, and forced businesses to close broke out. One could even argue that as mayor Montoya did the best he could possibly have to curtail the pandemic - much better than Varro probably would have. Without examining factors that could affect the prosperity of the city beyond the efficacy of either mayor’s leadership, the argument’s conclusion remains poor and is left wanting.
Finally, the argument is flawed because it boldly assumes that the people of San Perdito would be better off with Varro and not Montoya as their leader. However, the argument offers no concrete evidence to support said assumption. Admittedly, the information provided in the argument could suggest that Varro is the better leader, but without evidence such as the efficacy of his policies or ratings from citizens, one could argue that the reason the city experienced a downturn in Montoya’s time is because just before Varro left office he put in place certain policies that worsened the economic situations in San Perdito. It could be the case that Montoya actually exceeded expectations in curbing the negative effects that Varro’s policy had. If the aforementioned situations prove to be true, the argument’s conclusion would prove to be completely false.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore questionable. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned the lack of external factors that could have contributed to the changes in the socio-economic situations in either mayor’s terms, and provided solid evidence to show the efficacy of Varro’s leadership. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and should be viewed with scepticism.
____
The argument in the local newspaper claims that residents of San Perdito would be best served if they impeached Montoya and reelected Varra as mayor because in Montoya’s tenure as mayor the city experienced a decline in population, an increase in unemployment rates, and the closing of businesses, but conversely experienced an increase in population and a decrease unemployment rate in Varro’s time. However, the argument is flawed because it jumps to the conclusion that Varro was responsible for the prosperity of the city while Montoya was responsible for its deterioration. Furthermore, the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence making its conclusion weak and unconvincing.
First, the argument fails to discuss or consider the magnitude of the increase or decrease in population and unemployment rates. Perhaps, in Varro’s time the population increased and unemployment rates decreased by insignificant amounts, and it could also be the case that that population decreased and unemployment rates increased by insignificant amounts in Montoya’s time. If these two situations prove to be true, the change in the metrics in question cannot be used to further the case for Varro over Montoya.
Second, the argument assumes that prosperity of the city in Varro’s time and its downturn in Montoya’s can be attributed solely to the leadership of either mayor failing to consider other factors that could be responsible for the phenomena that occurred in mayors’ periods of leadership. For instance, Montoya could have taken the reigns from Varro at the time a serious pandemic that claimed numerous lives, putt people out of work, and forced businesses to close broke out. One could even argue that as mayor Montoya did the best he could possibly have to curtail the pandemic - much better than Varro probably would have. Without examining factors that could affect the prosperity of the city beyond the efficacy of either mayor’s leadership, the argument’s conclusion remains poor and is left wanting.
Finally, the argument is flawed because it boldly assumes that the people of San Perdito would be better off with Varro and not Montoya as their leader. However, the argument offers no concrete evidence to support said assumption. Admittedly, the information provided in the argument could suggest that Varro is the better leader, but without evidence such as the efficacy of his policies or ratings from citizens, one could argue that the reason the city experienced a downturn in Montoya’s time is because just before Varro left office he put in place certain policies that worsened the economic situations in San Perdito. It could be the case that Montoya actually exceeded expectations in curbing the negative effects that Varro’s policy had. If the aforementioned situations prove to be true, the argument’s conclusion would prove to be completely false.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore questionable. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned the lack of external factors that could have contributed to the changes in the socio-economic situations in either mayor’s terms, and provided solid evidence to show the efficacy of Varro’s leadership. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and should be viewed with scepticism.
