Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 May 2023, 06:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
“Over the past two years, Pageturner’s profits have decreased by 5 percent, even though we have added a popular café as well as a music section selling CDs and tapes. At the same time, we have experienced an increase in the theft of merchandise. We should therefore follow the example of Thoreau Books, which increased its profits after putting copies of its most frequently stolen books on a high shelf behind the payment counter. By doing likewise with copiess that our staff reported stolen last year, we too can increase profitability.”
Essay:
The argument claims that Pageturner can increase it's profits by opting Thoreau Books' strategy. The conclusion of the argument is based on a premise that Thoreau Books was able to increase its profit by opting a srategy to curb theft. The conclusion of the argument is based on the assumption for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvining and has several flaws.
First, the argumet has made a fraudulent assumption that the strategy that worked for Thoreau Books will surely work for Pageturner. However, it could be possible that these two firms work in completely different sectors or geners and the things that work for one sector doesn't at all work in another sector. Infact, strategy mentioned, if opted by Pageturner, could lead to a negative impact on profitability of Pageturner. In such a case, more research is required to properly conclude the argument.
Second, the argument has assumed without providing any data or evidence that merchandise theft is solely responsible for decrease in the profits of Pageturner. However, there could be such other reasons as poor product quality, high product prices or bad customer support that could be responsible for decrease in the profits. In such an instance, more data is required to eliminate alternate factors and properly conclude the argument.
Finally, the argument has mentioned a strategy in which most frequently stolen stuff is put behind the payment counter and has recommended that Pageturner should adopt this strategy. However, there is a possibilty that more popular and best selling stuff is the one which is also being stolen frequently. If this is the case, then this strategy could backfire as payment counter is the area of the store where customers are not allowed to go. So customers will not find the hot selling material and a result sales will decrease further.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for above mentioned reasons and is thus unconvincing. Based on the given premises, it can't be concluded that by opting Thoreau Books' strategy, Pageturner will be able to increase its profitability. Without any further knowledge and data, the argument remains unsubstantiated ad open for debate.
Essay:
The argument claims that Pageturner can increase it's profits by opting Thoreau Books' strategy. The conclusion of the argument is based on a premise that Thoreau Books was able to increase its profit by opting a srategy to curb theft. The conclusion of the argument is based on the assumption for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvining and has several flaws.
First, the argumet has made a fraudulent assumption that the strategy that worked for Thoreau Books will surely work for Pageturner. However, it could be possible that these two firms work in completely different sectors or geners and the things that work for one sector doesn't at all work in another sector. Infact, strategy mentioned, if opted by Pageturner, could lead to a negative impact on profitability of Pageturner. In such a case, more research is required to properly conclude the argument.
Second, the argument has assumed without providing any data or evidence that merchandise theft is solely responsible for decrease in the profits of Pageturner. However, there could be such other reasons as poor product quality, high product prices or bad customer support that could be responsible for decrease in the profits. In such an instance, more data is required to eliminate alternate factors and properly conclude the argument.
Finally, the argument has mentioned a strategy in which most frequently stolen stuff is put behind the payment counter and has recommended that Pageturner should adopt this strategy. However, there is a possibilty that more popular and best selling stuff is the one which is also being stolen frequently. If this is the case, then this strategy could backfire as payment counter is the area of the store where customers are not allowed to go. So customers will not find the hot selling material and a result sales will decrease further.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for above mentioned reasons and is thus unconvincing. Based on the given premises, it can't be concluded that by opting Thoreau Books' strategy, Pageturner will be able to increase its profitability. Without any further knowledge and data, the argument remains unsubstantiated ad open for debate.
17 May 2023, 02:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5
The essay demonstrates a generally coherent line of reasoning, with logical connections between ideas. The arguments and counterarguments are presented in a structured manner. However, there are some areas where the connectivity could be improved for smoother transitions between paragraphs.
Word Structure: 5.5
The essay uses a varied vocabulary and employs appropriate word structures for the most part. There are some minor instances where word choice could be refined or sentences could be structured more effectively.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5
The essay follows a clear paragraph structure, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument and presents relevant analysis. However, the transitions between paragraphs could be further improved for better coherence and flow.
Language and Grammar: 6
The essay demonstrates strong language and grammar skills. The sentences are well-formed, and the essay is free from major grammatical errors. The language used is clear and effective in conveying the points.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5
The essay employs a range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic. The writer uses precise and relevant words to express ideas. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of using more sophisticated vocabulary and expressions to enhance the overall impact of the essay.
Overall, the essay showcases a good understanding of the argument and presents a logical analysis. With some improvements in coherence, vocabulary, and paragraph transitions, the essay can be further strengthened. Based on the evaluation criteria, the essay scores approximately 5.5 - 6 out of 6.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5
The essay demonstrates a generally coherent line of reasoning, with logical connections between ideas. The arguments and counterarguments are presented in a structured manner. However, there are some areas where the connectivity could be improved for smoother transitions between paragraphs.
Word Structure: 5.5
The essay uses a varied vocabulary and employs appropriate word structures for the most part. There are some minor instances where word choice could be refined or sentences could be structured more effectively.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5
The essay follows a clear paragraph structure, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument and presents relevant analysis. However, the transitions between paragraphs could be further improved for better coherence and flow.
Language and Grammar: 6
The essay demonstrates strong language and grammar skills. The sentences are well-formed, and the essay is free from major grammatical errors. The language used is clear and effective in conveying the points.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5
The essay employs a range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic. The writer uses precise and relevant words to express ideas. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of using more sophisticated vocabulary and expressions to enhance the overall impact of the essay.
Overall, the essay showcases a good understanding of the argument and presents a logical analysis. With some improvements in coherence, vocabulary, and paragraph transitions, the essay can be further strengthened. Based on the evaluation criteria, the essay scores approximately 5.5 - 6 out of 6.
jim441
Moderator:
