Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
11 Aug 2023, 15:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994
Requesting for evaluation of my Essay on the undermentioned AWA prompt :-
QUESTION
"The term 'couch potato' may seem harmless, but television watching has been shown to shift mental activity from higher brain regions to lower ones. That is because TV is a one-way medium, reducing one's tendency to engage and interact. Using a computer, on the other hand, is a two-way activity that encourages interaction. Since many television watchers report feeling sluggish and even sleepy after several hours' viewing, it is clear that switching off the TV and switching on the computer will result in increased energy, brain activity, and mental sharpness."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
ESSAY
The argument under reference, possibly an extract from a popular social or wellness magazine, argues against television watching, primarily owing to passive nature of such activity and claims regarding reduced engagement and interaction vis--vis computer. The author rests his argument on the sole assumption of passivity of TV watching while making a strong case for promoting computer activities as compared to TV watching. While the argument may seem logically sound in the initial glance, on a deeper analysis it comes to the fore that there are several critical flaws pertaining to lack of supporting evidence, assumptions, and other reasoning errors, which have enumerated in the succeeding paragraphs.
Firstly, the author attributes total passivity while watching several shows on television. While arguing so strongly, the author has not considered the entire scope of the television shows. While the claims may hold true for entertainment based TV shows, the same may not be justified, considering that there are several knowledge and reality shows, which activate the mental faculties of the audience, and in turn, motivate the people to achieve similar activity levels as the actors in those shows.
Secondly, the author's argument rests on the doubtful assumption that television watching curbs creativity since it reduces one's tendency to engage and interact. A careful and well-analyzed view of television watching may prove contrary to the claims since several shows aired on television are aimed specifically for different audience categories. In particular, the educational shows aired on television are focused at encouraging creativity in children.
Thirdly, the author's argument is too limited in scope. The author needs to enhance the scope , considering television , a popular media, has stood the test of time. Television has been successfully used by several governments as well as organizations in various nations to broadcast flagship schemes and utility shows to engage the local populace towards promoting inclusion. Non-coverage of such aspects by the author makes the argument a one-sided one.
Towards improving the logical consistency in the argument, the author needs to include analyses, comparative matrix , surveys etc covering important facets and benefits accrued, primarily related to engagement and interaction, to gain a wholesome orientation. Towards making the case stronger, the author needs to include supporting evidence and examples in form of real life scenarios.
In essence, the argument, in its existing state, is logically deficient considering that it is backed up by the sole premise, and lacks adequate supporting evidence and examples. Inclusion of surveys , comparative analyses and expert views, aimed at strengthening the case for switching over to computers, will significantly assist the author in making his case regarding superiority of adopting computers over watching television more favorable to assimilation.
Requesting for evaluation of my Essay on the undermentioned AWA prompt :-
QUESTION
"The term 'couch potato' may seem harmless, but television watching has been shown to shift mental activity from higher brain regions to lower ones. That is because TV is a one-way medium, reducing one's tendency to engage and interact. Using a computer, on the other hand, is a two-way activity that encourages interaction. Since many television watchers report feeling sluggish and even sleepy after several hours' viewing, it is clear that switching off the TV and switching on the computer will result in increased energy, brain activity, and mental sharpness."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
ESSAY
The argument under reference, possibly an extract from a popular social or wellness magazine, argues against television watching, primarily owing to passive nature of such activity and claims regarding reduced engagement and interaction vis--vis computer. The author rests his argument on the sole assumption of passivity of TV watching while making a strong case for promoting computer activities as compared to TV watching. While the argument may seem logically sound in the initial glance, on a deeper analysis it comes to the fore that there are several critical flaws pertaining to lack of supporting evidence, assumptions, and other reasoning errors, which have enumerated in the succeeding paragraphs.
Firstly, the author attributes total passivity while watching several shows on television. While arguing so strongly, the author has not considered the entire scope of the television shows. While the claims may hold true for entertainment based TV shows, the same may not be justified, considering that there are several knowledge and reality shows, which activate the mental faculties of the audience, and in turn, motivate the people to achieve similar activity levels as the actors in those shows.
Secondly, the author's argument rests on the doubtful assumption that television watching curbs creativity since it reduces one's tendency to engage and interact. A careful and well-analyzed view of television watching may prove contrary to the claims since several shows aired on television are aimed specifically for different audience categories. In particular, the educational shows aired on television are focused at encouraging creativity in children.
Thirdly, the author's argument is too limited in scope. The author needs to enhance the scope , considering television , a popular media, has stood the test of time. Television has been successfully used by several governments as well as organizations in various nations to broadcast flagship schemes and utility shows to engage the local populace towards promoting inclusion. Non-coverage of such aspects by the author makes the argument a one-sided one.
Towards improving the logical consistency in the argument, the author needs to include analyses, comparative matrix , surveys etc covering important facets and benefits accrued, primarily related to engagement and interaction, to gain a wholesome orientation. Towards making the case stronger, the author needs to include supporting evidence and examples in form of real life scenarios.
In essence, the argument, in its existing state, is logically deficient considering that it is backed up by the sole premise, and lacks adequate supporting evidence and examples. Inclusion of surveys , comparative analyses and expert views, aimed at strengthening the case for switching over to computers, will significantly assist the author in making his case regarding superiority of adopting computers over watching television more favorable to assimilation.
11 Aug 2023, 22:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains good coherence and connectivity throughout. Each paragraph flows logically from the previous one, and the ideas are well-organized and connected. However, there are a few instances where sentence transitions could be smoother.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with a varied and appropriate use of vocabulary. There are a few minor instances where sentence structures could be refined for better clarity and flow.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific point and providing elaboration. The formation of paragraphs is effective in presenting the analysis and critique. Some paragraphs could be more concise without sacrificing clarity.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language and grammar are strong, and the essay demonstrates a good command of written English. There are a few minor grammatical errors and instances where sentence construction could be improved for smoother reading.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are generally appropriate and contribute to the essay's clarity and persuasiveness. A wider range of vocabulary could be used in some places to enhance precision and depth of expression.
Overall, the essay provides a thoughtful analysis of the argument's strengths and weaknesses. It effectively highlights flaws in the argument's logic and identifies assumptions that weaken its validity. The suggestions for improvement, such as including supporting evidence, surveys, and comparative analyses, are well-founded and would indeed strengthen the argument's case. With minor improvements in sentence transitions, grammar, and vocabulary usage, the essay could achieve an even higher level of coherence and persuasiveness.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains good coherence and connectivity throughout. Each paragraph flows logically from the previous one, and the ideas are well-organized and connected. However, there are a few instances where sentence transitions could be smoother.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with a varied and appropriate use of vocabulary. There are a few minor instances where sentence structures could be refined for better clarity and flow.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific point and providing elaboration. The formation of paragraphs is effective in presenting the analysis and critique. Some paragraphs could be more concise without sacrificing clarity.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language and grammar are strong, and the essay demonstrates a good command of written English. There are a few minor grammatical errors and instances where sentence construction could be improved for smoother reading.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are generally appropriate and contribute to the essay's clarity and persuasiveness. A wider range of vocabulary could be used in some places to enhance precision and depth of expression.
Overall, the essay provides a thoughtful analysis of the argument's strengths and weaknesses. It effectively highlights flaws in the argument's logic and identifies assumptions that weaken its validity. The suggestions for improvement, such as including supporting evidence, surveys, and comparative analyses, are well-founded and would indeed strengthen the argument's case. With minor improvements in sentence transitions, grammar, and vocabulary usage, the essay could achieve an even higher level of coherence and persuasiveness.
pintukr
Moderator:
