Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
29 Sep 2023, 02:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
The following appeared in a magazine article on trends and lifestyles.
"In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, and you will also find a wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content. Next door, the owners of the Good Earth Café, an old vegetarian restaurant, are still making a modest living, but the owners of the new House of Beef across the street are millionaires."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
My answer:
The argument states that people are not as concerned about the consumption of red meat and fatty cheeses, as they used to be a decade ago. It further states an example citing three diferent stores/eateries, but is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, it assumes that a sample represents an entire population. It simply provides an example of the following places: a grain shop that started selling cheese with high butterfat content, a vegetarian cafe and a place called House of Beef, the owners of which are millionaires. Even if some people buy or eat things at these places, the pattern may not be applicable to wider population.
Moreover, it cites a very causal example, without more statistical proof and reliable evidence. The argument would have been stronger if it had stated the statistical comparison between the previous decade's and the current decade's intake of meat and fatty cheeses. The current examples (with more data about each shop/restaurant) could have served as low-level overview to supplement the statistical data.
Lastly, it does not state more details about the shops and the eateries mentioned. There is no evidence stating that people actually buy and consume the cheese from Heart's delight. And the Good Earth Cafe is simply stated to be a vegetarian cafe, whose owners make a modest living, without further information about its menu. Furthermore, even though the owners of House of Beef are millionaires, we cannot infer whether House of Beef is their only source of revenue. If it had been mentioned that the House of Beef was their sole income source, then we could have concluded that they make large profits by selling red meat at their place, indicating that their consumers do eat a lot of red meat.
In conclusion, the argument needs more statistical data, representing a wider population, and also needs to provide a good correlation between the premise and the given examples to be stronger.
"In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, and you will also find a wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content. Next door, the owners of the Good Earth Café, an old vegetarian restaurant, are still making a modest living, but the owners of the new House of Beef across the street are millionaires."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
My answer:
The argument states that people are not as concerned about the consumption of red meat and fatty cheeses, as they used to be a decade ago. It further states an example citing three diferent stores/eateries, but is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, it assumes that a sample represents an entire population. It simply provides an example of the following places: a grain shop that started selling cheese with high butterfat content, a vegetarian cafe and a place called House of Beef, the owners of which are millionaires. Even if some people buy or eat things at these places, the pattern may not be applicable to wider population.
Moreover, it cites a very causal example, without more statistical proof and reliable evidence. The argument would have been stronger if it had stated the statistical comparison between the previous decade's and the current decade's intake of meat and fatty cheeses. The current examples (with more data about each shop/restaurant) could have served as low-level overview to supplement the statistical data.
Lastly, it does not state more details about the shops and the eateries mentioned. There is no evidence stating that people actually buy and consume the cheese from Heart's delight. And the Good Earth Cafe is simply stated to be a vegetarian cafe, whose owners make a modest living, without further information about its menu. Furthermore, even though the owners of House of Beef are millionaires, we cannot infer whether House of Beef is their only source of revenue. If it had been mentioned that the House of Beef was their sole income source, then we could have concluded that they make large profits by selling red meat at their place, indicating that their consumers do eat a lot of red meat.
In conclusion, the argument needs more statistical data, representing a wider population, and also needs to provide a good correlation between the premise and the given examples to be stronger.
30 Sep 2023, 04:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains good coherence and connectivity throughout. The ideas flow logically from one point to another, with clear transitions between them. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one, enhancing the overall structure of the essay.
Word Structure: 6/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures effectively. The language is clear, concise, and well-structured, contributing to the overall readability of the essay.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay follows a standard paragraph structure, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph presents a single point or idea, which is then elaborated upon. However, some paragraphs could be more tightly focused on a single aspect of the argument.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar in the essay are excellent. There are no major grammatical errors or awkward sentence constructions. The essay effectively communicates the author's ideas.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used in the essay is generally strong and appropriate for the topic. However, there is room for slightly more sophisticated word choices in some places to enhance the overall quality of expression.
Overall, this essay demonstrates strong analytical writing skills. It effectively evaluates the argument's reasoning and use of evidence while maintaining a high level of coherence and language proficiency. There are minor improvements that could be made in terms of vocabulary and paragraph structure, but overall, it is well-written and persuasive.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains good coherence and connectivity throughout. The ideas flow logically from one point to another, with clear transitions between them. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one, enhancing the overall structure of the essay.
Word Structure: 6/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures effectively. The language is clear, concise, and well-structured, contributing to the overall readability of the essay.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay follows a standard paragraph structure, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph presents a single point or idea, which is then elaborated upon. However, some paragraphs could be more tightly focused on a single aspect of the argument.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar in the essay are excellent. There are no major grammatical errors or awkward sentence constructions. The essay effectively communicates the author's ideas.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used in the essay is generally strong and appropriate for the topic. However, there is room for slightly more sophisticated word choices in some places to enhance the overall quality of expression.
Overall, this essay demonstrates strong analytical writing skills. It effectively evaluates the argument's reasoning and use of evidence while maintaining a high level of coherence and language proficiency. There are minor improvements that could be made in terms of vocabulary and paragraph structure, but overall, it is well-written and persuasive.
aapatre
Moderator:
