Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
18 Oct 2023, 00:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
The following appeared as part of a column in a popular entertainment magazine:
“The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it—even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Answer:
A column in a certain entertainment magazine states that the producers of the upcoming movie, 3003, could potentially maximize their profits by casting Robin Good and paying him millions of dollars to star in it. The amount, however, is greater than that of any person in the production crew of the film would make through the project. But, the argument is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, the article bases its prediction on the fact that Robin has been previously paid similar sums and was also involved in multiple financially successful movies. It assumes that a similar trend would hold true for this film and neglects the possibility of an exception. Moreover, Robin may have also been involved in movies that flopped financially and the same has been omitted in the article. Hence, more data is needed about the same.
Furthermore, the author of the column assumes that the movies, under discussion, generated immense profits only due to the involvement of Robin Good. There might be another factor in play, which might have been accidentally missed out on. For example, the movies might have had an engaging story, drawing in multiple people to watch it; or the movies might have simply been a mass-appeal film. Hence, the author might have strengthened the argument by mentioning if Robin Good films ar successful solely because of his fan base.
Finally, it assumes that casting Robin Good is the only way for the film to earn maxium profits, without stating other possible alternatives based on evidences. There can be several other ways to relaize more profits, such as screening the film in more regions wherein they can target the right audiences, or even by optimizing their budget.
Therefore, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and can be strengthened by introducing more statistics on the previous films of Robin Good, and also exploring other possible alternatives.
“The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it—even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Answer:
A column in a certain entertainment magazine states that the producers of the upcoming movie, 3003, could potentially maximize their profits by casting Robin Good and paying him millions of dollars to star in it. The amount, however, is greater than that of any person in the production crew of the film would make through the project. But, the argument is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, the article bases its prediction on the fact that Robin has been previously paid similar sums and was also involved in multiple financially successful movies. It assumes that a similar trend would hold true for this film and neglects the possibility of an exception. Moreover, Robin may have also been involved in movies that flopped financially and the same has been omitted in the article. Hence, more data is needed about the same.
Furthermore, the author of the column assumes that the movies, under discussion, generated immense profits only due to the involvement of Robin Good. There might be another factor in play, which might have been accidentally missed out on. For example, the movies might have had an engaging story, drawing in multiple people to watch it; or the movies might have simply been a mass-appeal film. Hence, the author might have strengthened the argument by mentioning if Robin Good films ar successful solely because of his fan base.
Finally, it assumes that casting Robin Good is the only way for the film to earn maxium profits, without stating other possible alternatives based on evidences. There can be several other ways to relaize more profits, such as screening the film in more regions wherein they can target the right audiences, or even by optimizing their budget.
Therefore, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and can be strengthened by introducing more statistics on the previous films of Robin Good, and also exploring other possible alternatives.
18 Oct 2023, 10:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity (5.5/6):
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity. The ideas are logically organized, and there is a smooth flow of thoughts from one point to the next. Transitions between paragraphs are effectively used, enhancing the essay's overall clarity.
Word Structure (6/6):
The essay displays a strong command of word structure. Sentences are well-structured and varied, contributing to the overall readability of the text. There is a clear and appropriate use of vocabulary.
Paragraph Structure and Formation (5.5/6):
Paragraphs are appropriately structured and developed. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point, providing an introduction, supporting details, and a concluding statement. The organization is effective, but there is a minor room for improvement in the depth of elaboration in some parts.
Language and Grammar (5.5/6):
Language and grammar usage is strong, with only a few minor issues. The essay is mostly free of grammatical errors, and the sentence structures are clear. There are some minor language issues in places, such as "a certain entertainment magazine," which could be made more specific, and "the same" in the sentence, "the same has been omitted in the article," could be rephrased for clarity.
Vocabulary and Word Expression (5.5/6):
The vocabulary and word expression are well above average. The essay effectively uses a range of vocabulary to articulate ideas. Some areas for improvement include avoiding repetitiveness (e.g., "the same" could be replaced with "this information").
Overall, this essay is well-written and effectively addresses the argument's flaws while offering suggestions for improvement. It demonstrates strong coherence, word structure, paragraph formation, language, and vocabulary. Minor improvements in grammar and specific vocabulary usage would make it even stronger.
Coherence and Connectivity (5.5/6):
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity. The ideas are logically organized, and there is a smooth flow of thoughts from one point to the next. Transitions between paragraphs are effectively used, enhancing the essay's overall clarity.
Word Structure (6/6):
The essay displays a strong command of word structure. Sentences are well-structured and varied, contributing to the overall readability of the text. There is a clear and appropriate use of vocabulary.
Paragraph Structure and Formation (5.5/6):
Paragraphs are appropriately structured and developed. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point, providing an introduction, supporting details, and a concluding statement. The organization is effective, but there is a minor room for improvement in the depth of elaboration in some parts.
Language and Grammar (5.5/6):
Language and grammar usage is strong, with only a few minor issues. The essay is mostly free of grammatical errors, and the sentence structures are clear. There are some minor language issues in places, such as "a certain entertainment magazine," which could be made more specific, and "the same" in the sentence, "the same has been omitted in the article," could be rephrased for clarity.
Vocabulary and Word Expression (5.5/6):
The vocabulary and word expression are well above average. The essay effectively uses a range of vocabulary to articulate ideas. Some areas for improvement include avoiding repetitiveness (e.g., "the same" could be replaced with "this information").
Overall, this essay is well-written and effectively addresses the argument's flaws while offering suggestions for improvement. It demonstrates strong coherence, word structure, paragraph formation, language, and vocabulary. Minor improvements in grammar and specific vocabulary usage would make it even stronger.
aapatre
Moderator:
