Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 Nov 2023, 05:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thanks in advance for evaluating my essay!
The following appeared as part of a column in a popular entertainment magazine:
“The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it—even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
My answer:
The argument claims that the upcoming movie, 3003, will maximize its profits if they pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it. Since previous movies that Robin has starred in where he was paid a similar amount were financially successful, the producers believe that their movie will achieve the same outcome. Stated in this way, the argument fails to consider several key factors that could affect the success of this particular movie and remains unsubstantiated.
First, the argument readily assumes that Robin's previous successful movies are comparable to 3003. This is a stretch because we do not know anything about the nature of 3003 or his previous movies. There are plenty of variables that could have caused the success of his previous movies; just because Robin Good was casted in those movies doesn’t mean he was the reason for their success. Additionally, there are too many unknowns about 3003 and the effect of casting Robin Good for it. For example, if 3003 was a biographical account of Robin Good’s life, then casting Robin Good may indeed maximize its chances of success. However, if 3003 is entirely unrelated to Robin’s previous works - such as in its genre and audience - then casting Good may not lead to a significant difference in profits than if the producers were to cast a different actor. The argument could have been much clearer if it described some of these important elements about both his previous movies and 3003.
Second, the argument claims that they must pay Robin Good several million dollars in order for him to accept the role. This is a weak claim because his previous movies may have had a larger budget, of which his salary was a certain percentage. If 3003 has a smaller budget, Good may be willing to accept this role with its comparatively smaller salary if the percentage of the overall budget that his salary would account for is still on par with the percentage of the budget he received in his previous movies. In addition, Good may be motivated to accept the role for non-financial reasons. If he is particularly interested in certain aspects of 3003 or in portraying that particular character, then the producers may not need to pay him millions of dollars. Without knowing what would motivate Good - financially and non-financially - to accept the role, we cannot conclude that the producers must pay Good several millions. If the argument had provided evidence regarding his motives, the argument would have been much more convincing.
In summary, the argument has several significant flaws and is therefore unconvincing. Using the conditions of his previous movies’ success as a prediction of 3003’s success is an unsupported leap of faith because there are too many unknowns, including Good’s motives for whether or not to accept the role and the nature of 3003. The argument could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned these relevant facts. Without such, the conclusion of the argument remains questionable and open to debate.
The following appeared as part of a column in a popular entertainment magazine:
“The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it—even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
My answer:
The argument claims that the upcoming movie, 3003, will maximize its profits if they pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it. Since previous movies that Robin has starred in where he was paid a similar amount were financially successful, the producers believe that their movie will achieve the same outcome. Stated in this way, the argument fails to consider several key factors that could affect the success of this particular movie and remains unsubstantiated.
First, the argument readily assumes that Robin's previous successful movies are comparable to 3003. This is a stretch because we do not know anything about the nature of 3003 or his previous movies. There are plenty of variables that could have caused the success of his previous movies; just because Robin Good was casted in those movies doesn’t mean he was the reason for their success. Additionally, there are too many unknowns about 3003 and the effect of casting Robin Good for it. For example, if 3003 was a biographical account of Robin Good’s life, then casting Robin Good may indeed maximize its chances of success. However, if 3003 is entirely unrelated to Robin’s previous works - such as in its genre and audience - then casting Good may not lead to a significant difference in profits than if the producers were to cast a different actor. The argument could have been much clearer if it described some of these important elements about both his previous movies and 3003.
Second, the argument claims that they must pay Robin Good several million dollars in order for him to accept the role. This is a weak claim because his previous movies may have had a larger budget, of which his salary was a certain percentage. If 3003 has a smaller budget, Good may be willing to accept this role with its comparatively smaller salary if the percentage of the overall budget that his salary would account for is still on par with the percentage of the budget he received in his previous movies. In addition, Good may be motivated to accept the role for non-financial reasons. If he is particularly interested in certain aspects of 3003 or in portraying that particular character, then the producers may not need to pay him millions of dollars. Without knowing what would motivate Good - financially and non-financially - to accept the role, we cannot conclude that the producers must pay Good several millions. If the argument had provided evidence regarding his motives, the argument would have been much more convincing.
In summary, the argument has several significant flaws and is therefore unconvincing. Using the conditions of his previous movies’ success as a prediction of 3003’s success is an unsupported leap of faith because there are too many unknowns, including Good’s motives for whether or not to accept the role and the nature of 3003. The argument could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned these relevant facts. Without such, the conclusion of the argument remains questionable and open to debate.
06 Nov 2023, 08:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6
Coherence and connectivity (6/6):
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph flows logically into the next, and the ideas are well-connected. Transitions between points are smooth, ensuring that the reader can follow the argument.
Word structure (6/6):
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and lengths. It maintains clarity and conciseness throughout, ensuring that the argument is easily comprehensible.
Paragraph structure and formation (6/6):
The essay employs a well-structured paragraph format, with clear topic sentences and supporting evidence or analysis in each paragraph. This structure enhances the readability and organization of the essay.
Language and Grammar (6/6):
The essay maintains a high level of language and grammar, with no significant issues. The language used is clear, and there are no grammar or syntax errors that detract from the essay's quality.
Vocabulary and word expression (6/6):
The vocabulary and word expression used in the essay are varied and appropriate for an analytical piece. The language used is precise, and the essay effectively conveys the writer's critique.
Overall, the essay is well-structured, coherent, and effectively conveys the writer's critique of the argument presented in the magazine column. It demonstrates strong analytical skills and provides a clear and reasoned assessment. The essay does not have any significant language or grammar issues and maintains excellent word structure.
Coherence and connectivity (6/6):
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph flows logically into the next, and the ideas are well-connected. Transitions between points are smooth, ensuring that the reader can follow the argument.
Word structure (6/6):
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and lengths. It maintains clarity and conciseness throughout, ensuring that the argument is easily comprehensible.
Paragraph structure and formation (6/6):
The essay employs a well-structured paragraph format, with clear topic sentences and supporting evidence or analysis in each paragraph. This structure enhances the readability and organization of the essay.
Language and Grammar (6/6):
The essay maintains a high level of language and grammar, with no significant issues. The language used is clear, and there are no grammar or syntax errors that detract from the essay's quality.
Vocabulary and word expression (6/6):
The vocabulary and word expression used in the essay are varied and appropriate for an analytical piece. The language used is precise, and the essay effectively conveys the writer's critique.
Overall, the essay is well-structured, coherent, and effectively conveys the writer's critique of the argument presented in the magazine column. It demonstrates strong analytical skills and provides a clear and reasoned assessment. The essay does not have any significant language or grammar issues and maintains excellent word structure.
ｃｈｌｏｅｅｓｔｒａｄａ
Moderator:
