Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
08 Nov 2023, 20:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
Essay Question:
The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
“The inflow of immigrant workers into our community has put a downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average compensation of unskilled labor in our city has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. Therefore, to protect our local economy, it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
Response:
The argument states that the inflow of immigrant workers into the community has led to a downward pressure on the wages and provides the data regarding the change in average compensation of unskilled workers in the city over the past 5 years to support this claim. It also claims that it is essential to impose a further moratorium on further immigration to protect the local economy. However, I feel that this argument falls flat on several counts and needs to be further investigated.
Firstly, there has been on data provided to suggest that it is the immigrant population that is responsible for the trend. It is very much possible that the immigrants are much more skilled than the local population and in fact engage in white collar jobs. Thus, effectively nullifying the cause and effect relationship which might have led to a fall in wages for unskilled labor.
Secondly, we need data to establish that the fall has in wages has not been caused by other reasons. It might very well be true that inefficient government policies have led to an economic slowdown as has been the case in most of the recessionary scenarios such as Great Depression of 1930 or Financial Crisis in 2008. We also need to check whether this trend had started well before there was an increase in the inflow of immigrant workers, for reasons such as automation replacing the need to employ unskilled labor and to pay the same amount of wages as earlier.
Thirdly, even if we were to believe that immigrant workers are indeed putting a downward pressure on wages, we can't automatically assume that it is a threat to the local economy. It has the potential to further reduce the cost of manufacturing for the businesses in the economy, thus making them much more competitive on the global stage. It might help in increasing the overall demand for manufacturing in the country and consequently the number of available jobs. Once the economy grows, there would be higher tax revenues which can be utilized for wealth redistribution and make up for the lost wages.
In the end, I would conclude that we need to look at the situation much more holistically in light of the necessary data which the author might not have considered in his argument before we could substantially put the blame on immigrants.
The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:
“The inflow of immigrant workers into our community has put a downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average compensation of unskilled labor in our city has declined by nearly 10% over the past 5 years. Therefore, to protect our local economy, it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
Response:
The argument states that the inflow of immigrant workers into the community has led to a downward pressure on the wages and provides the data regarding the change in average compensation of unskilled workers in the city over the past 5 years to support this claim. It also claims that it is essential to impose a further moratorium on further immigration to protect the local economy. However, I feel that this argument falls flat on several counts and needs to be further investigated.
Firstly, there has been on data provided to suggest that it is the immigrant population that is responsible for the trend. It is very much possible that the immigrants are much more skilled than the local population and in fact engage in white collar jobs. Thus, effectively nullifying the cause and effect relationship which might have led to a fall in wages for unskilled labor.
Secondly, we need data to establish that the fall has in wages has not been caused by other reasons. It might very well be true that inefficient government policies have led to an economic slowdown as has been the case in most of the recessionary scenarios such as Great Depression of 1930 or Financial Crisis in 2008. We also need to check whether this trend had started well before there was an increase in the inflow of immigrant workers, for reasons such as automation replacing the need to employ unskilled labor and to pay the same amount of wages as earlier.
Thirdly, even if we were to believe that immigrant workers are indeed putting a downward pressure on wages, we can't automatically assume that it is a threat to the local economy. It has the potential to further reduce the cost of manufacturing for the businesses in the economy, thus making them much more competitive on the global stage. It might help in increasing the overall demand for manufacturing in the country and consequently the number of available jobs. Once the economy grows, there would be higher tax revenues which can be utilized for wealth redistribution and make up for the lost wages.
In the end, I would conclude that we need to look at the situation much more holistically in light of the necessary data which the author might not have considered in his argument before we could substantially put the blame on immigrants.
10 Nov 2023, 00:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a high level of coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one logically, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs are smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay.
Word Structure: 6/6
The word structure is strong, with varied sentence structures and a precise choice of words. The writer effectively conveys ideas using a rich vocabulary, and there are no major issues with word usage or awkward phrasing.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized into distinct paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. However, there is room for improvement in the introduction, which could be more concise in summarizing the main points to be addressed in the essay. The conclusion effectively synthesizes the main arguments but could be strengthened by reinforcing the key points.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are exemplary. Sentences are grammatically correct, and there is a consistent and appropriate use of formal language throughout. The essay demonstrates a strong command of English language conventions.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 6/6
The vocabulary and word expression are excellent. The writer uses a wide range of vocabulary to articulate ideas clearly and precisely. The essay avoids redundancy and employs language that enhances the overall persuasiveness of the argument.
Overall, the essay is well-crafted, presenting a clear and coherent analysis of the given argument. The writer effectively identifies flaws in the logic, questions underlying assumptions, and provides thoughtful counterpoints. With some minor refinements in paragraph structure and the introduction, the essay could achieve an even higher level of effectiveness.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay exhibits a high level of coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one logically, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs are smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay.
Word Structure: 6/6
The word structure is strong, with varied sentence structures and a precise choice of words. The writer effectively conveys ideas using a rich vocabulary, and there are no major issues with word usage or awkward phrasing.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized into distinct paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. However, there is room for improvement in the introduction, which could be more concise in summarizing the main points to be addressed in the essay. The conclusion effectively synthesizes the main arguments but could be strengthened by reinforcing the key points.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are exemplary. Sentences are grammatically correct, and there is a consistent and appropriate use of formal language throughout. The essay demonstrates a strong command of English language conventions.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 6/6
The vocabulary and word expression are excellent. The writer uses a wide range of vocabulary to articulate ideas clearly and precisely. The essay avoids redundancy and employs language that enhances the overall persuasiveness of the argument.
Overall, the essay is well-crafted, presenting a clear and coherent analysis of the given argument. The writer effectively identifies flaws in the logic, questions underlying assumptions, and provides thoughtful counterpoints. With some minor refinements in paragraph structure and the introduction, the essay could achieve an even higher level of effectiveness.
Himank96
Moderator:
