Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
12 Nov 2023, 06:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thanks in advance for evaluating my essay!
The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
My answer:
The argument claims that drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water is a wise investment in good health. However, the argument fails to take into account several key factors and relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is unconvincing and breaks down easily.
First, the argument readily assumes that the residents of Saluda are drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water, and not alternatives like tap water or bottled water from other brands. This assumption is a stretch because despite residents living in the town of Saluda, there is no evidence proving that Saluda residents indeed drink Saluda Natural Spring Water. Unless the residents were drinking exclusively Saluda Natural Spring Water, we would not be able to isolate the effect of drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water on residents' health. The argument would have been much stronger if it proved this through, for example, a survey asking Saluda residents what types of water they drink.
Secondly, the argument fails to consider other factors that influence the residents of Saluda's health. The lower hospitalization rate for residents of Saluda, in comparison to the national average, is not necessarily caused by drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water. The residents of Saluda could have healthier habits, such as having a nutritious, balanced diet and exercising regularly, than the rest of the nation. If these habits are indeed true, then the company that produces Saluda Natural Spring Water is essentially taking credit for these residents' good health and stating that it is the quality of our water, not any other lifestyle factors, that gives drinkers of it good health.
Finally, the evidence provided by the producers of Saluda Natural Spring Water is inadequate. The sample size - residents of Saluda - is too small and may be unrepresentative of all drinkers of Saluda Natural Spring Water. The results from one town are not enough to make a generalization about the entire nation. It's possible that if the drinkers of Saluda Natural Spring Water across the country were analyzed, there could be a negligible effect of drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water on health. Moreover, there would need to be clear comparisons of health between large, representative samples of Saluda Natural Spring Water drinkers vs. non-Saluda Natural Spring Water drinkers. This would establish more convincingly whether Saluda Natural Spring Water has the effects it claims to have.
In summary, the conclusion of this argument is questionable because of its unrepresentative sample and the faulty assumptions aforementioned. If the argument had drawn on the examples as suggested and plugged the holes in its reasoning, then it would have been much more convincing.
The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
My answer:
The argument claims that drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water is a wise investment in good health. However, the argument fails to take into account several key factors and relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is unconvincing and breaks down easily.
First, the argument readily assumes that the residents of Saluda are drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water, and not alternatives like tap water or bottled water from other brands. This assumption is a stretch because despite residents living in the town of Saluda, there is no evidence proving that Saluda residents indeed drink Saluda Natural Spring Water. Unless the residents were drinking exclusively Saluda Natural Spring Water, we would not be able to isolate the effect of drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water on residents' health. The argument would have been much stronger if it proved this through, for example, a survey asking Saluda residents what types of water they drink.
Secondly, the argument fails to consider other factors that influence the residents of Saluda's health. The lower hospitalization rate for residents of Saluda, in comparison to the national average, is not necessarily caused by drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water. The residents of Saluda could have healthier habits, such as having a nutritious, balanced diet and exercising regularly, than the rest of the nation. If these habits are indeed true, then the company that produces Saluda Natural Spring Water is essentially taking credit for these residents' good health and stating that it is the quality of our water, not any other lifestyle factors, that gives drinkers of it good health.
Finally, the evidence provided by the producers of Saluda Natural Spring Water is inadequate. The sample size - residents of Saluda - is too small and may be unrepresentative of all drinkers of Saluda Natural Spring Water. The results from one town are not enough to make a generalization about the entire nation. It's possible that if the drinkers of Saluda Natural Spring Water across the country were analyzed, there could be a negligible effect of drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water on health. Moreover, there would need to be clear comparisons of health between large, representative samples of Saluda Natural Spring Water drinkers vs. non-Saluda Natural Spring Water drinkers. This would establish more convincingly whether Saluda Natural Spring Water has the effects it claims to have.
In summary, the conclusion of this argument is questionable because of its unrepresentative sample and the faulty assumptions aforementioned. If the argument had drawn on the examples as suggested and plugged the holes in its reasoning, then it would have been much more convincing.
13 Nov 2023, 10:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5 - 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized and maintains a logical flow of ideas. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one, contributing to a coherent and connected discussion. Transitions between points are clear and effective.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary and effectively uses varied sentence structures. However, in a few instances, there is a slight repetitiveness in the use of certain words and phrases. Some variation could enhance the overall word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The paragraphs are well-structured, with clear topic sentences and supporting details. Each paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to a thorough analysis. There is a good balance between providing evidence, explanations, and examples.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language is precise, and grammar is generally strong throughout the essay. There are a few instances where sentence structures could be slightly refined for better clarity, but these are minor issues that do not significantly impact understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used is appropriate and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. There is a good range of vocabulary, contributing to the overall clarity and sophistication of the essay. However, a bit more diversity in the choice of certain words could further enhance expression.
In summary, the essay is well-written, with strong coherence, effective word structure, and sound paragraph formation. Some minor improvements in word variety and refinement of sentence structures could elevate the overall quality.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized and maintains a logical flow of ideas. Each paragraph builds upon the previous one, contributing to a coherent and connected discussion. Transitions between points are clear and effective.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary and effectively uses varied sentence structures. However, in a few instances, there is a slight repetitiveness in the use of certain words and phrases. Some variation could enhance the overall word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The paragraphs are well-structured, with clear topic sentences and supporting details. Each paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to a thorough analysis. There is a good balance between providing evidence, explanations, and examples.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language is precise, and grammar is generally strong throughout the essay. There are a few instances where sentence structures could be slightly refined for better clarity, but these are minor issues that do not significantly impact understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used is appropriate and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. There is a good range of vocabulary, contributing to the overall clarity and sophistication of the essay. However, a bit more diversity in the choice of certain words could further enhance expression.
In summary, the essay is well-written, with strong coherence, effective word structure, and sound paragraph formation. Some minor improvements in word variety and refinement of sentence structures could elevate the overall quality.
ｃｈｌｏｅｅｓｔｒａｄａ
Moderator:
