Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
03 Dec 2023, 13:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
Prompt: "Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for over 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers-some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well.
Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Essay:
This excerpt from an article argues why the sound that motocycle X makes is not the sole reason for it's ability to attract customers. While two justifications for this argument are presented, they both fail to provide an absolute conclusion.
The first justification draws a comparison to the car industry and states the market dynamics prevalent there. However, it does not take into consideration several other factors impacting the relative success of foreign cars. For example, cars may be purchased by customers for a variety of commercial and personal uses. Hence the sound made by the car may not be a top factor in the purchase decision, in fact it might not be a consideration at all. The assumption that foreign cars sell at least as well as those made in the US because they tend to be quieter is hence flawed. Additionally, this justification, via its comparison, does not offer any explanation for the failure of the foreign company in its copy of motorcycle X.
The second justification, while it is more relevant, focuses on the lack of focus on the sound made by motorcycle X in its advertisements. Here, customer preference is not explored i.e., the sound of motorcycle X may be an expectation for its customers while they may need convincing of it's durability, design and persona. Again, this justification fails to examine several more pertinent causes and factors to support the argument.
There are several other justifications and evidence that would make this argument stronger. For instance, evaluating brand preference would be highly convincing. While brand loyalty may be an outcome of advertising, past experience or word of mouth, evidence around brand nationalism would provide a better justification. In conclusion, the article could be reasoned better by providing justifications that directly address the argument, providing examples to illustrate the arguement better and by providing backing evidence for the given justifications.
Posted from my mobile device
Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Essay:
This excerpt from an article argues why the sound that motocycle X makes is not the sole reason for it's ability to attract customers. While two justifications for this argument are presented, they both fail to provide an absolute conclusion.
The first justification draws a comparison to the car industry and states the market dynamics prevalent there. However, it does not take into consideration several other factors impacting the relative success of foreign cars. For example, cars may be purchased by customers for a variety of commercial and personal uses. Hence the sound made by the car may not be a top factor in the purchase decision, in fact it might not be a consideration at all. The assumption that foreign cars sell at least as well as those made in the US because they tend to be quieter is hence flawed. Additionally, this justification, via its comparison, does not offer any explanation for the failure of the foreign company in its copy of motorcycle X.
The second justification, while it is more relevant, focuses on the lack of focus on the sound made by motorcycle X in its advertisements. Here, customer preference is not explored i.e., the sound of motorcycle X may be an expectation for its customers while they may need convincing of it's durability, design and persona. Again, this justification fails to examine several more pertinent causes and factors to support the argument.
There are several other justifications and evidence that would make this argument stronger. For instance, evaluating brand preference would be highly convincing. While brand loyalty may be an outcome of advertising, past experience or word of mouth, evidence around brand nationalism would provide a better justification. In conclusion, the article could be reasoned better by providing justifications that directly address the argument, providing examples to illustrate the arguement better and by providing backing evidence for the given justifications.
Posted from my mobile device
05 Dec 2023, 12:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains a good level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are logically organized, and each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. The writer effectively addresses the justifications presented in the argument and builds a coherent response. However, there are a few instances where the connection between ideas could be strengthened for a more seamless flow.
Word Structure: 6/6
The word structure is strong, with a clear and precise expression of ideas. The essay uses varied sentence structures effectively, contributing to the overall quality of writing. The vocabulary is appropriate, and the writer successfully conveys their thoughts with clarity and sophistication.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-structured into paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The writer introduces a clear topic sentence in each paragraph and supports it with relevant explanations and examples. However, there are a few places where ideas could be further developed for a more thorough analysis. Additionally, a concise summary in the concluding paragraph could enhance the overall structure.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with minor room for improvement. The essay effectively communicates ideas with precision, but there are a few instances of awkward phrasing and grammatical issues that slightly impact fluency. A thorough proofreading would help eliminate these minor errors and enhance the overall language and grammar.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are commendable, with a diverse and appropriate choice of words. The essay effectively conveys nuanced ideas, and the language adds depth to the analysis. However, there are a few instances where more varied vocabulary could be employed to further enhance expression.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay maintains a good level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are logically organized, and each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. The writer effectively addresses the justifications presented in the argument and builds a coherent response. However, there are a few instances where the connection between ideas could be strengthened for a more seamless flow.
Word Structure: 6/6
The word structure is strong, with a clear and precise expression of ideas. The essay uses varied sentence structures effectively, contributing to the overall quality of writing. The vocabulary is appropriate, and the writer successfully conveys their thoughts with clarity and sophistication.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-structured into paragraphs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The writer introduces a clear topic sentence in each paragraph and supports it with relevant explanations and examples. However, there are a few places where ideas could be further developed for a more thorough analysis. Additionally, a concise summary in the concluding paragraph could enhance the overall structure.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with minor room for improvement. The essay effectively communicates ideas with precision, but there are a few instances of awkward phrasing and grammatical issues that slightly impact fluency. A thorough proofreading would help eliminate these minor errors and enhance the overall language and grammar.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are commendable, with a diverse and appropriate choice of words. The essay effectively conveys nuanced ideas, and the language adds depth to the analysis. However, there are a few instances where more varied vocabulary could be employed to further enhance expression.
snehshah
Moderator:
