Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
13 Dec 2023, 04:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994
Requesting for an evaluation of my essay on basis of the undermentioned prompt :-
QUESTION
The following memo was circulated by the management team of a retail company:
“We are very pleased to announce the relocation of our inventory, which had been located in four different warehouses throughout the country, to a single new warehouse near Company headquarters in Boston. This consolidated location will cut the company’s expenses for warehouse rent in half. As a result we expect our monthly profitability to go up by this amount.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
ESSAY
The argument under reference, an extract from internal memo by the company management, highlights the need to centralize the inventory to one location instead of the existing framework of four dispersed locations throughout the country, aimed at reduction in operating costs and consequent increase in profitability. The author has developed his argument relying on the doubtful assumption that the existing customer base shall remain intact, and also served with similar efficiency as in the past, post the relocation of inventory to a single new warehouse near Company headquarters in Boston.
At initial glance, the argument seems fairly convincing; however, post an in-depth analysis , it becomes evident that the proposed initiative suffers because of lack of supporting evidence and certain far-reaching assumptions. It needs to be highlighted that the supporting evidence in terms of components to sales as well as comparative operating costs for both scenarios have not been deliberated upon in the memo. Besides, as regards the logical consistency of the argument, there are several limitations as well as critical flaws, which have been highlighted in the succeeding paragraphs.
Firstly, the author has not substantiated his argument in favor of a central location for inventory through depiction of changes in operating costs necessitated due to hiring of additional space and manpower for the centralized location as compared with the existing costs for four different warehousing locations.
Secondly, the argument lacks supporting evidence for preferring a particular location, since the initiative will entail larger distances and the associated increase in delivery time frames to the existing customer base at various locations across the country. The author needs to highlight the plans to cater to new delivery modes and automation initiatives in this regard.
Thirdly, the author's assumption regarding the increased profit estimates have not been substantiated in the form of savings accrued consequent to rationalization. Detailed calculations for the same along with related calculations for increase in land purchase, labor and other fixed costs need to be furnished.
Towards improving the logical soundness of the argument, the author should consider furnishing further details of the proposed initiative in the form comparative estimates for both the scenarios, existing subscriber base locations, requirement of additional resources, and calculations related to envisaged profit estimates.
In essence, the argument, in its existing state, is logically deficient and suffers from critical flaws. The author needs to include adequate supporting evidence in the form of calculations, location analysis, and resource plans to substantiate the preference to adopt a centralized location framework for the inventory warehousing.
Requesting for an evaluation of my essay on basis of the undermentioned prompt :-
QUESTION
The following memo was circulated by the management team of a retail company:
“We are very pleased to announce the relocation of our inventory, which had been located in four different warehouses throughout the country, to a single new warehouse near Company headquarters in Boston. This consolidated location will cut the company’s expenses for warehouse rent in half. As a result we expect our monthly profitability to go up by this amount.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.
ESSAY
The argument under reference, an extract from internal memo by the company management, highlights the need to centralize the inventory to one location instead of the existing framework of four dispersed locations throughout the country, aimed at reduction in operating costs and consequent increase in profitability. The author has developed his argument relying on the doubtful assumption that the existing customer base shall remain intact, and also served with similar efficiency as in the past, post the relocation of inventory to a single new warehouse near Company headquarters in Boston.
At initial glance, the argument seems fairly convincing; however, post an in-depth analysis , it becomes evident that the proposed initiative suffers because of lack of supporting evidence and certain far-reaching assumptions. It needs to be highlighted that the supporting evidence in terms of components to sales as well as comparative operating costs for both scenarios have not been deliberated upon in the memo. Besides, as regards the logical consistency of the argument, there are several limitations as well as critical flaws, which have been highlighted in the succeeding paragraphs.
Firstly, the author has not substantiated his argument in favor of a central location for inventory through depiction of changes in operating costs necessitated due to hiring of additional space and manpower for the centralized location as compared with the existing costs for four different warehousing locations.
Secondly, the argument lacks supporting evidence for preferring a particular location, since the initiative will entail larger distances and the associated increase in delivery time frames to the existing customer base at various locations across the country. The author needs to highlight the plans to cater to new delivery modes and automation initiatives in this regard.
Thirdly, the author's assumption regarding the increased profit estimates have not been substantiated in the form of savings accrued consequent to rationalization. Detailed calculations for the same along with related calculations for increase in land purchase, labor and other fixed costs need to be furnished.
Towards improving the logical soundness of the argument, the author should consider furnishing further details of the proposed initiative in the form comparative estimates for both the scenarios, existing subscriber base locations, requirement of additional resources, and calculations related to envisaged profit estimates.
In essence, the argument, in its existing state, is logically deficient and suffers from critical flaws. The author needs to include adequate supporting evidence in the form of calculations, location analysis, and resource plans to substantiate the preference to adopt a centralized location framework for the inventory warehousing.
17 Dec 2023, 12:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5 - 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates good coherence and connectivity. The introduction effectively summarizes the argument, and each paragraph is logically connected to the previous one. Transitions between ideas are generally smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay.
Word Structure: 5/6
The word structure is strong, with a varied and appropriate use of vocabulary. Sentences are generally well-constructed, contributing to the clarity of the argument. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could be further improved for enhanced readability.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a well-organized paragraph structure. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, and ideas within paragraphs are logically arranged. The essay includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, contributing to its overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language used is precise, and the grammar is generally accurate. However, there are a few instances of awkward phrasing or unclear expression that could be revised for greater clarity. Additionally, a more varied use of sentence structures could enhance the overall quality of language.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used is appropriate and contributes to the clarity of the argument. However, there is room for slight improvement in word expression for a more sophisticated and nuanced presentation of ideas. Consideration of synonyms or alternative expressions could enhance the overall richness of vocabulary.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively critiques the argument. With some minor improvements in sentence structure, language clarity, and vocabulary, the essay could achieve an even higher level of coherence and expression.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates good coherence and connectivity. The introduction effectively summarizes the argument, and each paragraph is logically connected to the previous one. Transitions between ideas are generally smooth, contributing to the overall flow of the essay.
Word Structure: 5/6
The word structure is strong, with a varied and appropriate use of vocabulary. Sentences are generally well-constructed, contributing to the clarity of the argument. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could be further improved for enhanced readability.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a well-organized paragraph structure. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, and ideas within paragraphs are logically arranged. The essay includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, contributing to its overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language used is precise, and the grammar is generally accurate. However, there are a few instances of awkward phrasing or unclear expression that could be revised for greater clarity. Additionally, a more varied use of sentence structures could enhance the overall quality of language.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary used is appropriate and contributes to the clarity of the argument. However, there is room for slight improvement in word expression for a more sophisticated and nuanced presentation of ideas. Consideration of synonyms or alternative expressions could enhance the overall richness of vocabulary.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively critiques the argument. With some minor improvements in sentence structure, language clarity, and vocabulary, the essay could achieve an even higher level of coherence and expression.
pintukr
Moderator:
