Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
22 Jan 2024, 09:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Alright understood. So I was giving a mock and this happened with me. Request you to review this one as well.
Topic
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Essay
The argument states that based on a study it was found that Saluda Spring water contains several minerals and that it is completely free of bacteria. The argument also conclusively suggests that drinking Saluda water would be a wise investment in good health. As it now stands, the argument is based on a assumptions to reach at the presented conclusion and lacks evidence to back these assumptions. Consequently, it has a few flaws that make the argument as a whole unconvincing.
Firstly, the argument asserts that the residents of Saluda, the town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Saluda is just the place where the water is bottled, this does not prove in any way that people in Saluda consume Saluda Natural Spring water. There is a possibility that people in Saluda rather consume tap water, or that they have strong immunity to any sort of bacteria, resulting in them being hospitalised less frequently. No clear connection has been established between residents of Saluda consuming Saluda Natural Spring water and being hospitalised less frequently. If a connection backed with evidence was provided, it would have strengthened the argument.
Secondly, the conclusion presented that even though Saluda Natural Spring water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of the tap water would be a wise investment is unjust. No substantial data about the mineral content and the presence of bacteria in the tap water is presented. Although there is a possibility that Saluda Natural Spring water is indeed healthier for the people and that tap water may contain less minerals and some bacteria, no data for the appropriate amount of minerals and level of bacteria has been stated as being harmful/ beneficial to one’s health. Some people would still consider consuming the tap water for it being in their budget and for it not doing any significant harm to their health. If relevant findings about the differing mineral and bacteria content was provided, the argument could be strengthened.
In conclusion the argument is not convincing because of the above-mentioned flaws. If clear data and substantial connections between the premise and the conclusion were established, the argument could be strengthened. In its current state the argument has flaws, is weak and unsound.
Topic
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Essay
The argument states that based on a study it was found that Saluda Spring water contains several minerals and that it is completely free of bacteria. The argument also conclusively suggests that drinking Saluda water would be a wise investment in good health. As it now stands, the argument is based on a assumptions to reach at the presented conclusion and lacks evidence to back these assumptions. Consequently, it has a few flaws that make the argument as a whole unconvincing.
Firstly, the argument asserts that the residents of Saluda, the town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Saluda is just the place where the water is bottled, this does not prove in any way that people in Saluda consume Saluda Natural Spring water. There is a possibility that people in Saluda rather consume tap water, or that they have strong immunity to any sort of bacteria, resulting in them being hospitalised less frequently. No clear connection has been established between residents of Saluda consuming Saluda Natural Spring water and being hospitalised less frequently. If a connection backed with evidence was provided, it would have strengthened the argument.
Secondly, the conclusion presented that even though Saluda Natural Spring water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of the tap water would be a wise investment is unjust. No substantial data about the mineral content and the presence of bacteria in the tap water is presented. Although there is a possibility that Saluda Natural Spring water is indeed healthier for the people and that tap water may contain less minerals and some bacteria, no data for the appropriate amount of minerals and level of bacteria has been stated as being harmful/ beneficial to one’s health. Some people would still consider consuming the tap water for it being in their budget and for it not doing any significant harm to their health. If relevant findings about the differing mineral and bacteria content was provided, the argument could be strengthened.
In conclusion the argument is not convincing because of the above-mentioned flaws. If clear data and substantial connections between the premise and the conclusion were established, the argument could be strengthened. In its current state the argument has flaws, is weak and unsound.
23 Jan 2024, 08:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, creating a clear and organized structure. Transitions between ideas are smooth, contributing to a cohesive argument. The essay effectively links the premises to the conclusion, maintaining a focused discussion throughout.
Word Structure: 5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with a varied and appropriate choice of vocabulary. Sentences are well-constructed, and the essay effectively conveys the intended meaning. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could be more complex or varied for added sophistication. Additionally, there is a slight repetition of certain phrases, which could be addressed for improved expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5/6
The paragraph structure is sound, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction sets the stage, and each subsequent paragraph contributes to the analysis. However, the essay could benefit from a stronger concluding paragraph that summarizes key points and reinforces the overall evaluation.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are generally strong, with only minor errors. The essay effectively uses a formal and academic tone. There are a few instances of awkward phrasing or ambiguity that could be refined for greater clarity. Additionally, a more extensive range of sentence structures could enhance the overall fluency of the essay.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are strong, with the use of precise and appropriate terms. The essay effectively conveys the writer's ideas and analysis. However, as mentioned earlier, there is a slight repetition of certain phrases that, if diversified, could contribute to a more polished expression.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively evaluates the given argument. Addressing minor issues in word structure and refining language in a few places could further enhance the overall quality of the writing.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, creating a clear and organized structure. Transitions between ideas are smooth, contributing to a cohesive argument. The essay effectively links the premises to the conclusion, maintaining a focused discussion throughout.
Word Structure: 5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with a varied and appropriate choice of vocabulary. Sentences are well-constructed, and the essay effectively conveys the intended meaning. However, there are a few instances where sentence structure could be more complex or varied for added sophistication. Additionally, there is a slight repetition of certain phrases, which could be addressed for improved expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5/6
The paragraph structure is sound, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction sets the stage, and each subsequent paragraph contributes to the analysis. However, the essay could benefit from a stronger concluding paragraph that summarizes key points and reinforces the overall evaluation.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are generally strong, with only minor errors. The essay effectively uses a formal and academic tone. There are a few instances of awkward phrasing or ambiguity that could be refined for greater clarity. Additionally, a more extensive range of sentence structures could enhance the overall fluency of the essay.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression are strong, with the use of precise and appropriate terms. The essay effectively conveys the writer's ideas and analysis. However, as mentioned earlier, there is a slight repetition of certain phrases that, if diversified, could contribute to a more polished expression.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively evaluates the given argument. Addressing minor issues in word structure and refining language in a few places could further enhance the overall quality of the writing.
shivesh0802
Moderator:
