BijayKru
In statement 1
m |n| < |mn| —-> understood
But how you came to Know m|n| < 0. (Doubt) .
Posted from my mobile deviceHello Bijay,
ArunSharma12 has already done an exceptional job at explaining this question. I’ll try my best to not repeat things that he has already mentioned.
I want you to recall what we discussed when we took up this question in class. Question data says that neither m nor n can be zero. The question asks us whether m/n>0; in other words, it asks whether both m and n have the same signs.
Remember that I told you to test statement II alone first since that helps you eliminate certain answer options.
Statement II alone is an identity on Modulus. As per statement II, m and n HAVE to be of the same signs to satisfy the equation |m+n| = |m| + |n|.
Because statement II alone is sufficient, answer options A, C and E can be eliminated.
From statement I alone, m|n| - |mn| / |m+n| < 0.
|m+n| is always positive since it’s a modulus. Because the denominator is positive, the numerator has to be negative.
The numerator has 2 components i.e. -|mn| and m|n|.
-|mn| will definitely be negative. If the entire numerator has to be negative, m|n| also has to be negative. This can only happen when m is negative. Not sure?
Think about it – you are using the same values for m and n, you have the same product (of m and n) in both terms and the second term has a negative symbol – IF m is positive, the two terms will cancel out each other and numerator will become 0. If the numerator is 0, it invalidates the data given in statement I, isn’t it?m HAS to be negative. However, we do not know anything about the sign of n.
Therefore, statement I alone is insufficient to determine if m and n are of the same signs. Answer option D can be eliminated.
The correct answer option is B.
Hope that helps!