Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
29 Jul 2013, 10:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi Chiranjeev,
I am confused with an explanation provided in OG13 for an option.
Wood smoke contains dangerous toxins that cause changes in human cells. Because wood smoke presents such
a high health risk, legislation is needed to regulate the use of open-air fires and wood-burning stoves.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument above?
(A) The amount of dangerous toxins contained inwood smoke is much less than the amount contained in an
equal volume of automobile exhaust.
I took this option as Out of Scope as we are only focused on the toxins caused by burning wood and comparing toxins with automobile exhaust makes
the option OFS.
But the explaination in OG states that :
If wood smoke were as dangerous as car exhaust, this might support the idea of regulating it just as
exhaust emissions are regulated; but this statement tells us it is less dangerous.
The idea stated that if the smoke was as dangerous, it might support the argument. I am a bit confused here as it seems to be adding extra info
outside the general knowledge (just as exhaust emissions are regulated).
So, can a choice as below be considered correct for the passage above :
(A) The amount of dangerous toxins contained inwood smoke is much more than the amount contained in an
equal volume of automobile exhaust.
Thanks,
Sahil Batra
I am confused with an explanation provided in OG13 for an option.
Wood smoke contains dangerous toxins that cause changes in human cells. Because wood smoke presents such
a high health risk, legislation is needed to regulate the use of open-air fires and wood-burning stoves.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument above?
(A) The amount of dangerous toxins contained inwood smoke is much less than the amount contained in an
equal volume of automobile exhaust.
I took this option as Out of Scope as we are only focused on the toxins caused by burning wood and comparing toxins with automobile exhaust makes
the option OFS.
But the explaination in OG states that :
If wood smoke were as dangerous as car exhaust, this might support the idea of regulating it just as
exhaust emissions are regulated; but this statement tells us it is less dangerous.
The idea stated that if the smoke was as dangerous, it might support the argument. I am a bit confused here as it seems to be adding extra info
outside the general knowledge (just as exhaust emissions are regulated).
So, can a choice as below be considered correct for the passage above :
(A) The amount of dangerous toxins contained inwood smoke is much more than the amount contained in an
equal volume of automobile exhaust.
Thanks,
Sahil Batra
30 Jul 2013, 03:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
shlbatra
Hi Sahil,
Let me begin by saying that while OG questions are truly the best in the market, OG explanations are not. You will notice this fact much more in SC than in CR.
In this question, per OG explanation given, the option statement suggested by you should be a valid strengthener. However, it is not. The reason is that we don't know whether automobile exhaust is regulated or not. This information is not a universal fact which we can take as common knowledge.
So, all in all, you are correct that choice A is OFS and we cannot assume that automobile emissions are regulated.
Does this help?
Thanks,
Chiranjeev
