I was fortunate enough to be admitted to both UCLA Anderson and UVA Darden (no scholarship awarded at either). Unfortunately, I'm really struggling on what the right decision is for me.
For background, I am currently a data scientist aiming to transition into a Tech PM role. I was blessed enough to have my current company (a small software company in Atlanta) sponsor my MBA, so I will not have to pay for the education, but will owe them 3.5 years upon returning post-MBA. This removes any need to utilize the career center for internship / full-time job search. Long term, I would love to work for an early stage start-up and (very) long-term likely pursue VC / entrepreneurship.
I was born and raised in Atlanta, GA and have built a decent network here. However, I am a bit burnt out on the Southeast and would love to live out West for a while. I love Southern California, but due to the HCOL and my company sponsorship, I would probably opt to live in the Rockies post-MBA (I can work fully remote). Long term I will probably bounce between the West and East.
Here are the major pros / cons for each school that I have come up with so far.
Darden Pros:- Prestige (Darden typically borders Top 10 rankings)
- Venture Capital curriculum (there are VC bootcamps, clubs, and various connection events; they also claim that Charlottesville is the #1 fastest growing city for VC)
- Tight knit community (being a small town, it seems like the MBA students really get to know each other)
- Cost of living (significantly lower cost of living, I may even be able to purchase a condo and then rent it out after graduation)
Darden Cons:- Heavy workload (this may detract from being able to participate in VC clubs, network, etc.)
- Network is predominantly East coast (Darden's job report says that 15% end up in California & another 15% end up in the West)
- Small community size may make it difficult to meet people outside the program (I'm currently single and am open to finding a SO)
- Case based (Darden is 100% case based, I'm sure I'd get the hang of this but I'm not too experienced here, so there's a risk I don't adapt to this learning style)
Anderson Pros:- Recruits heavily for technology (employment report shows 30% of students end up at Tech companies such as Google, Facebook, etc.)
- Proximity to start-ups (Lyft, Snap, etc.)
- Activities (let's face it, LA sounds like a much cooler place to spend 2 years than Charlottesville)
- Curriculum (fairly flexible with capstone projects, such as Business Creation Option, that let's you build a company over 2 semesters)
- Large city (high odds that I could find a SO outside of the program)
Anderson Cons:- Slightly less prestigious (borderline Top 15; may get "crowded out" by other top west coast schools such as Haas and GSB)
- No clear VC curriculum (at least none that I could find)
- HCOL (LA is an expensive city, I think there would be ~$25k total swing between Darden & Anderson)
- Less school "identity" (I've heard from some Anderson students that they feel less connected to their classmates; likely a result of their being so much to do in LA)
I would greatly appreciate the communities perspectives, opinions, or frameworks on how to make a decision! Thank you all so much!