NGGMAT
HI
I am facing problems with pronouns in SC. When it comes to pronouns like which & that: I know they refer to the closest noun. But i face difficulty in recognizing the antecedent of it, they, etc.... when do they refer to the subject of main clause and when do they refer to the closest noun.
I am a not from a English speaking background but I have had all my education in English, but i face problems understanding the meaning of the sentences wen they are accompanied with lots of commas and pronouns. I have my exam in 10 days. Please help.
I will try to explain better with an example, so that you know exactly where I am facing problem:
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fie lds of large sea areas. they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated: I KNOW THAT... 2 THAT sound wrong... but y I have no idea. IT just isnt seeming right to my ear. ALso, I know that provide will be followed by THAT. second problem is how to identify what they is referring to in this sentence... closest noun fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas??? or provisions of new maritime code??
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
: It refers to the code right??? but it is so far away from it?? how do i know that it isnt referring to oil fileds(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated: in this qs... this seems wrong.. but when does this refer to the ause and when will it refer to the closest noun? the closest noun?
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating: which is supposed to refer to the closest noun... so code is correct... which always refer to the closest noun right?
i hope i could explain my problem
waiting for your reply.
Dear
NGGMAT,
I'm happy to respond.

First of all, here's a couple blogs you may find helpful.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-pronoun-traps/https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-sente ... agreement/https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-sente ... and-logic/The GMAT loves to concoct incorrect answer choices that are loaded with pronoun ambiguity. That's precisely what is happening this question.
(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated The "
that provided that" is a little awkward, but technically, it is correct, and if everything else were right, this could be part of a correct answer. The "
they" is highly problematic. Logically, we can deduce that "
they" should refer to "
provisions," but grammatically, the antecedent is ambiguous, and could refer to "
islets" or "
fisheries" or "
large sea areas." The pronoun "
they" is a complete 100% disaster in this answer choice, and this is precisely why this answer choice is wrong.
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulatedThis is a very subtle point:
rhetorical unity. If there are two clauses, and if a pronoun is the subject of the second clause, and if the subject of the first clause is more-or-less the main topic of the sentence, then the pronoun unambiguously refers to that first subject. See:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/919-focus-on-a-topicIn other words, as long as the sentence has a clear focus on a single topic, that single topic is the subject through all the clauses of the sentence. This is very typical for a well-written sentence.
(D)
Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulatedThe word "
this" is a disaster here. The word "
this" can only refer to a noun, a clear & unambiguous noun antecedent. The word "
this" can
NEVER refer to a verb or to the action of a clause as a whole. That usage does happen in colloquial English, but it is wrong 100% of the time on the GMAT. That's why this answer is wrong.
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulatingHere, you are correct: the "
which" correctly refers to the noun it touches, the "
maritime code." This one does not have any pronoun problems, but unfortunately, it has other serious problems. The verb tense "
is ... stimulating," present progressive, is a little unusual. Also a very subtle problem --- splitting the two words in the verb with an adverb: not 100% wrong, but in poor taste. The BIG problem with
(E) is that it commits the famous missing-verb mistake. There's no main clause in this version: only modifiers with nothing to modify! See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... b-mistake/Does all this make sense?
Mike