Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Updated on: 30 Mar 2021, 02:52
Originally posted by ishan261288 on 30 Mar 2021, 01:21.
Last edited by ishan261288 on 30 Mar 2021, 02:52, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by ishan261288 on 30 Mar 2021, 02:52, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Came across the following statement.
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators”
The above sentence can have two different meanings based on the entities between which the comparison is made. But obviously one of the meanings correctly conveys the original intent of the author. The two meanings are given below.
1. LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than with serological indicators, which means that LSM’s correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis is better than LSM’s correlation with serological indicators. (LSM w PHFL > LSM w SI)
If ‘1’ is correct as per the meaning, I have edited the sentence as follows
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than with serological indicators”
2. LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators have with pathological hepatic fibrosis level, which means that LSM’s correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis is better than the serological indicators’ correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level.
If '2' is correct as per the meaning, I have edited the sentence as follows
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators have” (LSM w PHFL > SI w PHFL)
Are both the sentences correct?
Thanks
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators”
The above sentence can have two different meanings based on the entities between which the comparison is made. But obviously one of the meanings correctly conveys the original intent of the author. The two meanings are given below.
1. LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than with serological indicators, which means that LSM’s correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis is better than LSM’s correlation with serological indicators. (LSM w PHFL > LSM w SI)
If ‘1’ is correct as per the meaning, I have edited the sentence as follows
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than with serological indicators”
2. LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators have with pathological hepatic fibrosis level, which means that LSM’s correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis is better than the serological indicators’ correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level.
If '2' is correct as per the meaning, I have edited the sentence as follows
“LSM has a better correlation with pathological hepatic fibrosis level than serological indicators have” (LSM w PHFL > SI w PHFL)
Are both the sentences correct?
Thanks
30 Mar 2021, 02:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
ishan261288
You might have mistyped, but the above two sentences (marked in blue) do not seem to depict the same meaning.
30 Mar 2021, 02:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
EducationAisle
Thanks for pointing this out. I've edited the sentence. Please see if you are able to understand my concern
