Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
While studying from the MGMAT guides for number properties, they recommend you rephrase the problem to eliminate wrong choices. The OA answer explanations do not use this approach. While I personally found rephrasing as a very efficient way of solving DS problems, I only fear getting it wrong if I rush into it. How many of you follow rephrasing as opposed to plain vanilla DS solving?
Also for those that rephrase do you actually pen down the rephrasing or do it mentally?
I guess the point I am making is the difference between the two approaches a matter of speed vs. accuracy?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I like the rephrasing strategy, but I only use it if I don't feel 100% comfortable with the way the question is already phrased. If it seems confusing to me at all or I quickly see an easier way to interpret I'll write it down so I don't lose focus of what they are asking. Also I'll rearrange or rephrase the info given and write that down if it pops out at me so I don't have to interpret that again. Like if it says x=2n+1 or something like that, I will just jot down x is odd, which is easier for me to work with than look at the given equation again when I go to the statements.
I use it. I actually write out the intermediate steps, just in case they appear in one of the statements. I start out doing easy/obvious steps, and then look at the statements. Some DS have to be rephrased to be able to answer.
I'll rephrase as much as I can. Especially with inequalities -- I've been pleasantly surprised by how much rephrasing a complicated question can set up. Sometimes the DS answers are exactly what my rephrasing points to (e.g., (1) x 3)
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.