Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 21:16 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 21:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
spiderman_xx
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Last visit: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Posts: 62
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
target780
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Last visit: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Posts: 29
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Sargataur
Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Last visit: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
spiderman_xx
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Last visit: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Posts: 62
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sargataur
unless theres a catch to this question or im not reading it right

1/4 marked with one mark = 1/4 of 4000 = 1000 fishes

400 fishes with 2 or more marks

so total marked fishes = 1400 of which reqd prob is 1000/1400 = 10/14

but i doubt the question is that easy....

what od u guys think ....71.5 percent or 0.715


target780, Sargataur,

Yes, the word 'at least 1/4' is part of the question stem [I am dead sure about this]. And No the answer is NOT 5/7 since this was "not" one of the five answer choices.
I too believe having 'at least' makes the problem unbounded and therefore this makes a good tricky problem which the ETS loves to throw into the questions.

Can anyone else give this problem a try.
User avatar
toddmartin
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Last visit: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
spiderman_xx
Sargataur
unless theres a catch to this question or im not reading it right

1/4 marked with one mark = 1/4 of 4000 = 1000 fishes

400 fishes with 2 or more marks

so total marked fishes = 1400 of which reqd prob is 1000/1400 = 10/14

but i doubt the question is that easy....

what od u guys think ....71.5 percent or 0.715

target780, Sargataur,

Yes, the word 'at least 1/4' is part of the question stem [I am dead sure about this]. And No the answer is NOT 5/7 since this was "not" one of the five answer choices.
I too believe having 'at least' makes the problem unbounded and therefore this makes a good tricky problem which the ETS loves to throw into the questions.

Can anyone else give this problem a try.


If this were a data sufficiency question I would say it is solvable, but it seems to be impossible to solve by hand. Since the probability is the number of favorable outcomes/total outcomes, you could add up the probability with 1/4 marked, then keep adding 1 more fish till you have all of them, or start with 0 marked, then go up to 1/4 and subtract 1 from this answer. Maybe there is some kind of pattern that would make any of these calculations possible but I don't know.

Was this problem in the OG? If so then do you know what number?
User avatar
spiderman_xx
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Last visit: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Posts: 62
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
toddmartin
spiderman_xx
Sargataur
unless theres a catch to this question or im not reading it right

1/4 marked with one mark = 1/4 of 4000 = 1000 fishes

400 fishes with 2 or more marks

so total marked fishes = 1400 of which reqd prob is 1000/1400 = 10/14

but i doubt the question is that easy....

what od u guys think ....71.5 percent or 0.715

target780, Sargataur,

Yes, the word 'at least 1/4' is part of the question stem [I am dead sure about this]. And No the answer is NOT 5/7 since this was "not" one of the five answer choices.
I too believe having 'at least' makes the problem unbounded and therefore this makes a good tricky problem which the ETS loves to throw into the questions.

Can anyone else give this problem a try.

If this were a data sufficiency question I would say it is solvable, but it seems to be impossible to solve by hand. Since the probability is the number of favorable outcomes/total outcomes, you could add up the probability with 1/4 marked, then keep adding 1 more fish till you have all of them, or start with 0 marked, then go up to 1/4 and subtract 1 from this answer. Maybe there is some kind of pattern that would make any of these calculations possible but I don't know.

Was this problem in the OG? If so then do you know what number?


toddmartin,
This was one of the questions that I got on my actual GMAT two weeks back. Of-course, the only rationale sol. I could get was 5/7, which was not one of the answer choices (I paniced). Therefore, I guessed.
Now, after seeing all of the responses, I guess this may have been an experimental question?



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!