Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
In general, if it's known that a triangle is a right triangle and its hypotenuse is c, it is not enough to find a and b in the equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
For instance, a^2 + b^2 = 5^2, we can't assume that it's a 3-4-5 triangle whenever a,b,c are real numbers.
However, my question is whether this applies to the integer case. Clearly if a^2 + b^2 = 5^2 and we know that a and b are integers then it's definitely a 3-4-5 triangle. In this case it's easy to get all permutations, but what if I'm given a^2 + b^2 = (large integer)^2, how do I know if there is more than one pair of perfect squares that would add up to the square of hypotenuse?
I'm asking this question because often I have seen in DS problems that only one side is given for a right triangle and the question prompt asks whether the data is sufficient. Clearly in certain cases it is sufficient, but not in the general one. Can anybody provide insight into this?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Do you have a specific problem to use as an example to clarify your question? There is actually more than one equation used on the GMAT to evaluate the sides of a triangle. The other two equations besides a^2+b^2=c^2 are:
In general, if it's known that a triangle is a right triangle and its hypotenuse is c, it is not enough to find a and b in the equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
For instance, a^2 + b^2 = 5^2, we can't assume that it's a 3-4-5 triangle whenever a,b,c are real numbers.
However, my question is whether this applies to the integer case. Clearly if a^2 + b^2 = 5^2 and we know that a and b are integers then it's definitely a 3-4-5 triangle. In this case it's easy to get all permutations, but what if I'm given a^2 + b^2 = (large integer)^2, how do I know if there is more than one pair of perfect squares that would add up to the square of hypotenuse?
I'm asking this question because often I have seen in DS problems that only one side is given for a right triangle and the question prompt asks whether the data is sufficient. Clearly in certain cases it is sufficient, but not in the general one. Can anybody provide insight into this?
Show more
You are obviously not expected to know all the pythagorean triplets.
For a small number, you can easily verify that there is only one pair of sides which gives the required hypotenuse. Say for 5, you can see that no other pair of numbers from 1 to 4 will give you the desired relation. But if the hypotenuse is large e.g. 65, you are not expected to know or calculate that it has 2 sets of sides possible (16, 63, 65) and (33, 56, 65). So there is no way they are going to test you on this.
In general, if it's known that a triangle is a right triangle and its hypotenuse is c, it is not enough to find a and b in the equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2.
For instance, a^2 + b^2 = 5^2, we can't assume that it's a 3-4-5 triangle whenever a,b,c are real numbers.
However, my question is whether this applies to the integer case. Clearly if a^2 + b^2 = 5^2 and we know that a and b are integers then it's definitely a 3-4-5 triangle. In this case it's easy to get all permutations, but what if I'm given a^2 + b^2 = (large integer)^2, how do I know if there is more than one pair of perfect squares that would add up to the square of hypotenuse?
I'm asking this question because often I have seen in DS problems that only one side is given for a right triangle and the question prompt asks whether the data is sufficient. Clearly in certain cases it is sufficient, but not in the general one. Can anybody provide insight into this?
Show more
It's good to memorize certain Pythagorean Triples, for example (3, 4, 5) and (5, 12, 13) and their derivatives: (6, 8, 10), (10, 24, 26). But as Karishma correctly noted you are not expected to know others.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.