Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 06:23 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 06:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Vijo
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Last visit: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Location: NJ
Posts: 76
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
shishirgupta77
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Last visit: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rupstar
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Last visit: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Location: Rockville
Posts: 116
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Looks right to me.

What would be the possibility of it?
User avatar
Rupstar
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Last visit: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Location: Rockville
Posts: 116
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A correction to my previous post i should have written
13c1*4c4*48c1
(mere technicality)
but my question was, why consider what the other card is since we only want to know if we can get the set of 4, so why multiply it by the various different cards that can be pulled...does this make sense?
eg: if i get A4AAA i only want to know what the probability of getting AAAA in 5 chances would be
why account for possibility of AA5A; AAA4A....and so on
User avatar
Antmavel
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 581
Own Kudos:
Location: London, UK
Schools:Tuck'08
Posts: 581
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
:? I would consider 52*3*2*1*48

What's the Oa for this problem ? If my answer is wrong, can you please explain why...thanks
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rupstar
A correction to my previous post i should have written
13c1*4c4*48c1
(mere technicality)
but my question was, why consider what the other card is since we only want to know if we can get the set of 4, so why multiply it by the various different cards that can be pulled...does this make sense?
eg: if i get A4AAA i only want to know what the probability of getting AAAA in 5 chances would be
why account for possibility of AA5A; AAA4A....and so on


That's why I asked "what is the probability" in my last post. This question asks "how many ways". Since "AAAA5" and "AAAA4" is counted as two ways, you definitely need to multiply that 48 to get the total number of outcomes. However, if you were to calculate the probability, then you don't need to count it. Just remember you can't count it either when you do the denominater.
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Antmavel
:? I would consider 52*3*2*1*48

What's the Oa for this problem ? If my answer is wrong, can you please explain why...thanks


Your problem is that your solution is ordered, as if the first A is somehow different from the second A. For example, if you pick spade A in your first pick, and heart A in your second pick, you'd count it as a pick that is different from a heart A first and then spade A. To get to the correct answer from your approach you'd have to divide your answer by P(4,4).
User avatar
Rupstar
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Last visit: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Location: Rockville
Posts: 116
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Awesome!
Honghu thanks for clarifying that !
User avatar
lastochka
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Last visit: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 193
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HongHu
Antmavel
:? I would consider 52*3*2*1*48

What's the Oa for this problem ? If my answer is wrong, can you please explain why...thanks

Your problem is that your solution is ordered, as if the first A is somehow different from the second A. For example, if you pick spade A in your first pick, and heart A in your second pick, you'd count it as a pick that is different from a heart A first and then spade A. To get to the correct answer from your approach you'd have to divide your answer by P(4,4).


To your point, why shouldn't you count the example you provided as two distinct ways? I still get confused when looking at computation vs. permutation... I do understand that with computation the order does matter, while with permutation it doesn't.
User avatar
Antmavel
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 581
Own Kudos:
Location: London, UK
Schools:Tuck'08
Posts: 581
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rupstar
A correction to my previous post i should have written
13c1*4c4*48c1


I really want to understand this problem :x

I understood your first post : 13c1*3c3*48C1
1 card out of 13 potential set + the 3 same + any other card

However I don't get your second post with correction :
13c1*4c4*48c1 ??? what is the logic here, why 4C4 ? for me it seems your meaning is 4 identical cards + any other one but you multiply the four cards by 13 sets because you can not be sure of whcih set

what is the difference between both expression ? except on the result ? what;s the logic behind it....moreover I stillhave difficulty to understand why my previous answer is considered as ordered : 52*3*2*1*48
the first pick there are 52 choices and then 3 choices then ....
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lastochka

To your point, why shouldn't you count the example you provided as two distinct ways? I still get confused when looking at computation vs. permutation... I do understand that with computation the order does matter, while with permutation it doesn't.


Combination is when order doesn't matter, while permutation is when order does matter.

This question asks how many ways a five card hand can be dealt. So as long as it's the same five card hand, it is one way. The order of the five cards in the same hand doesn't matter.
User avatar
halahpeno
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Last visit: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Posts: 26
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not to be a pain, but what about jokers? Or am I thinking too much?
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 962
Own Kudos:
Posts: 962
Kudos: 798
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We are assuming no jokers around. :-D



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!